A GIS-based policy support tool to determine national responsibilities and priorities for biodiversity conservation

24. Thomassen HA, Fuller T, Buermann W, Mila´ B, Kieswetter CM, Jarrı´n- VP, et al. Mapping evolutionary process: a multi-taxa approach to conservation prioritization. Evolutionary Applications 2011; 4: 397– 413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00172.x PMID: 25567981 25. Ottewell KM, Bickerton DC, Byrne M, Lowe AJ. Bridging the gap: a genetic assessment framework for population-level threatened plant conservation prioritization and decision-making. Diversity Distrib. 2016; 22: 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12387 26. Redding DW, Mooers AØ. Incorporating Evolutionary Measures into Conservation Prioritization. Con- servation Biology 2006; 20: 1670–1678. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00555.x PMID: 17181802 27. Tucker CM, Cadotte MW, Davies TJ, Rebelo TG. Incorporating Geographical and Evolutionary Rarity into Conservation Prioritization. Conservation Biology 2012; 26: 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1523-1739.2012.01845.x PMID: 22624595 28. Cadotte MW, Tucker CM. Difficult decisions: Strategies for conservation prioritization when taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity are not spatially congruent. Biological Conservation 2018; 225: 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.014 29. Kosman E, Burgio KR, Presley SJ, Willig MR, Scheiner SM. Conservation prioritization based on trait- based metrics illustrated with global parrot distributions. Divers Distrib. 2019; 25: 1156–1165. https:// doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12923 30. Vasudev D, Fletcher RJ Jr. Incorporating movement behavior into conservation prioritization in frag-

mented landscapes: An example of western hoolock gibbons in Garo Hills, India. Biological Conserva- tion 2015; 181: 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.021. 31. Campagnaro T, Trentanovi G, Sitzia T. Identifying Habitat Type Conservation Priorities under the Habi- tats Directive: Application to Two Italian Biogeographical Regions. Sustainability 2018; 10(4): 1189. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041189 32. Pert P L, Lieske SN, Hill R. Participatory development of a new interactive tool for capturing social and ecological dynamism in conservation prioritization. Landscape and Urban Planning 2013; 114: 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.02.010 33. Zhang L, Xu W-H, Ouyang Z-Y, Zhu C-Q. Determination of priority nature conservation areas and human disturbances in the Yangtze River Basin, China. Journal for Nature Conservation 2014; 22(4): 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2014.02.007 34. McGowan J, Beaumont LJ, Smith RJ, Chauvenet ALM, Harcourt R, Atkinson SC, et al. Conservation prioritization can resolve the flagship species conundrum. Nature Communications 2020; 11: 994– 1001. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14554-z PMID: 32094329 35. Carvalho F, Brown KA, Gordon AD, Yesuf GU, Raherilalao MJ, Raselimanana AP, et al. Methods for prioritizing protected areas using individual and aggregate rankings. Environmental Conservation 2020; 47(2): 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892920000090 36. Schmeller DS, Gruber B, Bauch B, Lanno K, Budrys E, Babij V, et al. Determination of national conser-

vation responsibilities for species conservation in regions with multiple political jurisdictions. Biodiversity and Conservation 2008; 17: 3607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9439-8 37. Schmeller D S, Bauch B, Gruber B, Juskaitis R, Budrys E, Babij V, et al. Determination of conservation priorities in regions with multiple political jurisdictions. Biodiversity and Conservation 2008; 17: 3623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9446-9. 38. Helldin JO, Wissman J, Lennartsson T. Abundance of red-listed species in infrastructure habitats–”re- sponsibility species” as a priority-setting tool for transportation agencies conservation action. In: Seiler A, Hedin J-O, editors. Proceedings of IENE 2014 International Conference on Ecology and Transporta- tion, Malmo, Sweden. Nature Conservation 2015;11: 143–158. doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.11. 4433. 39. Mittermeier RA, Myers N, Thomsen JB, Da Fonseca GAB, Olivieri S. Biodiversity Hotspots and Major Tropical Wilderness Areas: Approaches to Setting Conservation Priorities. Conservation Biology 1998; 12: 516–520. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003516.x 40. Schatz B, Gauthier P, Debussche M, Thompson JD. A decision tool for listing species for protection on different geographic scales and administrative levels. Journal for Nature Conservation 2014; 22: 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2013.09.003 41. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources). Spatial Data & Mapping Resources. Spatial Data Download. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK; 2020a [cited 2020

November 20]. Available from: https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/spatial-data-download 42. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources). Red List database. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK; 2020b [cited 2020 November 20]. Available from: https://www.iucnredlist.org PLOS ONE GIS-based policy support tool to determine national responsibilities for biodiversity conservation PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243135 December 3, 2020 21 / 23