Thông tin tài nguyên

Expected climate change consequences and their role in explaining individual risk judgments

pmc-PMC9931152.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 15 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 14 · Đoạn 41Vị trí nguồn

Expected climate change consequences and individual risk judgments PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281258 February 15, 2023 14 / 15

Trang 15 · Đoạn 42Vị trí nguồn

39. McCright AM, Dunlap RE. Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global environmental change. 2011; 21(4):1163–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2011.06.003 40. Ogunbode CA, Demski C, Capstick SB, Sposato RG. Attribution matters: Revisiting the link between extreme weather experience and climate change mitigation responses. Global Environmental Change. 2019; 54:31–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.005 41. Kahan DM. Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making. 2013; 8(4):407–24. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2182588 42. Campbell TH, Kay AC. Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2014; 107(5):809. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037963 PMID: 25347128 43. Smith N, Leiserowitz A. The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition. Risk Analy- sis. 2014; 34(5):937–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12140 PMID: 24219420 44. Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis. 2004; 24(2):311–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 0272-4332.2004.00433.x PMID: 15078302 45. Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin. 2001; 127 (2):267. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267 PMID: 11316014 46. Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Rosenthal S, Kotcher J, Bergquist P, Ballew M, et al. Climate change in the

Trang 15 · Đoạn 43Vị trí nguồn

American mind: April 2020. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication: Yale University and George Mason University, 2020. 47. Tobler C, Visschers VHM, Siegrist M. Consumers’ knowledge about climate change. Climatic Change. 2012; 114(2):189–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0393-1 48. Roser-Renouf C, Maibach EW. Strategic communication research to illuminate and promote public engagement with climate change. In: Hope DA, Bevins RA, editors. Change and Maintaining Change. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 167–218. 49. Tam K-P, Leung AKy, Koh B. Perceived cultural impacts of climate change motivate climate action and support for climate policy. Climatic Change. 2022; 171(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022- 03337-8 50. Reynolds TW, Bostrom A, Read D, Morgan MG. Now what do people know about global climate change? Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Analysis. 2010; 30(10):1520–38. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01448.x PMID: 20649942 PLOS ONE Expected climate change consequences and individual risk judgments PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281258 February 15, 2023 15 / 15