Expected climate change consequences and their role in explaining individual risk judgments
pmc-PMC9931152.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 15 trang
17. Read D, Bostrom A, Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Smuts T. What do people know about global climate change? 2. Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Analysis. 1994; 14(6):971–82. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00066.x 18. Reckien D, Wildenberg M, Bachhofer M. Subjective realities of climate change: how mental maps of impacts deliver socially sensible adaptation options. Sustainability Science. 2013; 8(2):159–72. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0179-z 19. Douglas M, Wildavsky A. Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmen- tal dangers: Univ of California Press; 1982. 20. Tvinnereim E, Fløttum K. Explaining topic prevalence in answers to open-ended survey questions about climate change. Nature Climate Change. 2015; 5(8):744–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2663 21. Levi S. Country-level conditions like prosperity, democracy, and regulatory culture predict individual cli- mate change belief. Communications Earth & Environment. 2021; 2(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s43247-021-00118-6 22. Tam K-P, Chan H-W. Environmental concern has a weaker association with pro-environmental behav- ior in some societies than others: A cross-cultural psychology perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2017; 53:213–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.09.001 23. Cologna V, Bark RH, Paavola J. Flood risk perceptions and the UK media: Moving beyond “once in a lifetime” to “Be Prepared” reporting. Climate Risk Management. 2017; 17:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.crm.2017.04.005
24. Nicholson-Cole SA. Representing climate change futures: a critique on the use of images for visual communication. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 2005; 29(3):255–73. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.compenvurbsys.2004.05.002 25. Norway Statistics. Statistikkbanken Registered vehicles [Internet]. [cited 09.11.2022]. Available from: https://www.ssb.no/en/statbank/table/07849. 26. Steentjes K, Pidgeon NF, Poortinga W, Corner AJ, Arnold A, Bo¨hm G, et al. European Perceptions of Climate Change (EPCC): Topline findings of a survey conducted in four European countries in 2016. Cardiff: Cardiff University, 2017. 27. Arnold A, Bo¨hm G, Corner A, Mays C, Pidgeon N, Poortinga W, et al. European Perceptions of Climate Change. Socio-political profiles to inform a crossnational survey in France, Germany, Norway and the UK. Oxford: Climate Outreach, 2016. 28. Pidgeon N. Public perceptions of climate change across four European countries: United Kingdom, France, Germany and Norway, 2016. [data collection]. UK Data Service. SN: 8325,. 2018. 29. Hornsey MJ, Harris EA, Bain PG, Fielding KS. Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change. 2016; 6(6):622. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2943 30. Bos W, Tarnai C. Content analysis in empirical social research. International Journal of Educational Research. 1999; 31(8):659–71. 31. Burgess A. Social construction of risk. In: Cho H, Reimer T, McComas KA, editors. The SAGE hand- book of risk communication. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2015. pp. 56–68.
32. Reser JP, Bradley GL. The nature, significance, and influence of perceived personal experience of cli- mate change. WIREs Climate Change. 2020; 11(5):e668. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.668 33. Punter P, Ochando-Pardo M, Garcia J. Spanish secondary school students’ notions on the causes and consequences of climate change. International Journal of Science Education. 2011; 33(3):447–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.492253 34. Whitmarsh L. What’s in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of “climate change” and “global warming”. Public Understanding of Science. 2009; 18(4):401–20. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0963662506073088 35. Leiserowitz A. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change. 2006; 77(1):45–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9 36. Smith N, Leiserowitz A. The rise of global warming skepticism: Exploring affective image associations in the United States over time. Risk Analysis. 2012; 32(6):1021–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924. 2012.01801.x PMID: 22486296 37. Mahl D, Guenther L, Scha¨fer MS, Meyer C, Siegen D. “We are a bit blind about it”: A qualitative analysis of climate change-related perceptions and communication across South African communities. Environ- mental Communication. 2020; 14(6):802–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1736116 38. Kim L, Ballew M, Lacroix K, Leiserowitz A, Marlon J. How does the American public perceive climate disasters? New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. 2020. PLOS ONE
Expected climate change consequences and individual risk judgments PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281258 February 15, 2023 14 / 15