Thông tin tài nguyên

Expected climate change consequences and their role in explaining individual risk judgments

pmc-PMC9931152.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 15 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 14 · Đoạn 38Vị trí nguồn

17. Read D, Bostrom A, Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Smuts T. What do people know about global climate change? 2. Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Analysis. 1994; 14(6):971–82. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00066.x 18. Reckien D, Wildenberg M, Bachhofer M. Subjective realities of climate change: how mental maps of impacts deliver socially sensible adaptation options. Sustainability Science. 2013; 8(2):159–72. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0179-z 19. Douglas M, Wildavsky A. Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmen- tal dangers: Univ of California Press; 1982. 20. Tvinnereim E, Fløttum K. Explaining topic prevalence in answers to open-ended survey questions about climate change. Nature Climate Change. 2015; 5(8):744–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2663 21. Levi S. Country-level conditions like prosperity, democracy, and regulatory culture predict individual cli- mate change belief. Communications Earth & Environment. 2021; 2(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s43247-021-00118-6 22. Tam K-P, Chan H-W. Environmental concern has a weaker association with pro-environmental behav- ior in some societies than others: A cross-cultural psychology perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2017; 53:213–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.09.001 23. Cologna V, Bark RH, Paavola J. Flood risk perceptions and the UK media: Moving beyond “once in a lifetime” to “Be Prepared” reporting. Climate Risk Management. 2017; 17:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.crm.2017.04.005

Trang 14 · Đoạn 39Vị trí nguồn

24. Nicholson-Cole SA. Representing climate change futures: a critique on the use of images for visual communication. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 2005; 29(3):255–73. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.compenvurbsys.2004.05.002 25. Norway Statistics. Statistikkbanken Registered vehicles [Internet]. [cited 09.11.2022]. Available from: https://www.ssb.no/en/statbank/table/07849. 26. Steentjes K, Pidgeon NF, Poortinga W, Corner AJ, Arnold A, Bo¨hm G, et al. European Perceptions of Climate Change (EPCC): Topline findings of a survey conducted in four European countries in 2016. Cardiff: Cardiff University, 2017. 27. Arnold A, Bo¨hm G, Corner A, Mays C, Pidgeon N, Poortinga W, et al. European Perceptions of Climate Change. Socio-political profiles to inform a crossnational survey in France, Germany, Norway and the UK. Oxford: Climate Outreach, 2016. 28. Pidgeon N. Public perceptions of climate change across four European countries: United Kingdom, France, Germany and Norway, 2016. [data collection]. UK Data Service. SN: 8325,. 2018. 29. Hornsey MJ, Harris EA, Bain PG, Fielding KS. Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change. 2016; 6(6):622. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2943 30. Bos W, Tarnai C. Content analysis in empirical social research. International Journal of Educational Research. 1999; 31(8):659–71. 31. Burgess A. Social construction of risk. In: Cho H, Reimer T, McComas KA, editors. The SAGE hand- book of risk communication. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2015. pp. 56–68.

Trang 14 · Đoạn 40Vị trí nguồn

32. Reser JP, Bradley GL. The nature, significance, and influence of perceived personal experience of cli- mate change. WIREs Climate Change. 2020; 11(5):e668. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.668 33. Punter P, Ochando-Pardo M, Garcia J. Spanish secondary school students’ notions on the causes and consequences of climate change. International Journal of Science Education. 2011; 33(3):447–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.492253 34. Whitmarsh L. What’s in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of “climate change” and “global warming”. Public Understanding of Science. 2009; 18(4):401–20. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0963662506073088 35. Leiserowitz A. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change. 2006; 77(1):45–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9 36. Smith N, Leiserowitz A. The rise of global warming skepticism: Exploring affective image associations in the United States over time. Risk Analysis. 2012; 32(6):1021–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924. 2012.01801.x PMID: 22486296 37. Mahl D, Guenther L, Scha¨fer MS, Meyer C, Siegen D. “We are a bit blind about it”: A qualitative analysis of climate change-related perceptions and communication across South African communities. Environ- mental Communication. 2020; 14(6):802–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1736116 38. Kim L, Ballew M, Lacroix K, Leiserowitz A, Marlon J. How does the American public perceive climate disasters? New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. 2020. PLOS ONE

Trang 14 · Đoạn 41Vị trí nguồn

Expected climate change consequences and individual risk judgments PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281258 February 15, 2023 14 / 15