Expected climate change consequences and their role in explaining individual risk judgments

Funding acquisition: Gisela Bo¨hm. Investigation: Gisela Bo¨hm. Methodology: Thea Gregersen, Rouven Doran, Gisela Bo¨hm, Hans-Ru¨diger Pfister. Project administration: Gisela Bo¨hm. Supervision: Rouven Doran, Gisela Bo¨hm. Writing – original draft: Thea Gregersen. Writing – review & editing: Thea Gregersen, Rouven Doran, Gisela Bo¨hm, Hans-Ru¨diger Pfister. References 1. IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Po¨ rtner H.-O, Rob- erts D.C, Tignor M., Poloczanska E.S., Mintenbeck K., Alegrı´a A., Craig M., Langsdorf S., Lo¨ schke S., Mo¨ller V, Okem A., Rama B. (eds.)]. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844 2. Gregersen T, Doran R, Bo¨hm G, Tvinnereim E, Poortinga W. Political orientation moderates the rela- tionship between climate change beliefs and worry about climate change. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020; 11(1573). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01573 PMID: 32765360 3. Lee TM, Markowitz EM, Howe PD, Ko C-Y, Leiserowitz AA. Predictors of public climate change aware- ness and risk perception around the world. Nature climate change. 2015; 5(11):1014. https://doi.org/10. 1038/nclimate2728 4. Shi J, Visschers VHM, Siegrist M, Arvai J. Knowledge as a driver of public perceptions about climate change reassessed. Nature Climate Change. 2016; 6:759. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2997 5. Spence A, Poortinga W, Pidgeon N. The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis: An

International Journal. 2012; 32(6):957–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x PMID: 21992607 6. Tvinnereim E, Lægreid OM, Liu X, Shaw D, Borick C, Lachapelle E. Climate change risk perceptions and the problem of scale: evidence from cross-national survey experiments. Environmental Politics. 2020:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1708538 7. Schultz PW, Milfont TL, Chance RC, Tronu G, Luı´s S, Ando K, et al. Cross-cultural evidence for spatial bias in beliefs about the severity of environmental problems. Environment and Behavior. 2014; 46 (3):267–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512458579 8. Kempton W. How the public views climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 1997; 39(9):12–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139159709604765 9. Moxnes E, Saysel AK. Misperceptions of global climate change: information policies. Climatic Change. 2009; 93(1–2):15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9465-2 10. Sterman JD. Risk communication on climate: mental models and mass balance. Science. 2008; 322 (5901):532–3. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162574 PMID: 18948524 11. Bo¨ hm G, Pfister H-R. Mental representation of global environmental risks. Environmental risks: Percep- tion, evaluation and management. 2001:1–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-1152(01)80022-3 12. Hohenemser C, Kasperson RE, Kates RW. Causal structure. In: Kates RW, Hohenemser C, Kasperson RE, editors. Perilous Progress: Managing the Hazards of Technology: Westview Press; 1985. pp. 25– 42.

13. Bostrom A. Mental models and risk perceptions related to climate change. Oxford Research Encyclope- dias. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.303 14. Bo¨ hm G, Stahl W, Henning HJ, Mader S. Alltagswissen und subjektives Risiko. In: (Hrsg.) VP, editor. Risikoanalysen II. Heidelberg: Asanger; 1998. pp. 19–43. 15. Lazo JK, Kinnell JC, Fisher A. Expert and layperson perceptions of ecosystem risk. Risk Analysis. 2000; 20(2):179–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.202019 PMID: 10859779 16. Bostrom A, Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Read D. What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis. 1994; 14(6):959–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00065. x PLOS ONE Expected climate change consequences and individual risk judgments PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281258 February 15, 2023 13 / 15