Evaluation of fish biodiversity in estuaries using environmental DNA metabarcoding

2. Roberts CM, McClean CJ, Veron JE, Hawkins JP, Allen GR, McAllister DE, et al. Marine biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities for tropical reefs. Science. 2002; 295 (5558): 1280–1284. https:// doi.org/10.1126/science.1067728 PMID: 11847338 3. Pimentel D, Harvey C, Resosudarmo P, Sinclair K, McNair M, Crist S, et al. Environmental and eco- nomic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science. 1995; 267 (5201): 1117–1123. https:// doi.org/10.1126/science.267.5201.1117 PMID: 17789193 4. Smith GC, Covich AP, Brasher AMD. An ecological perspective on the biodiversity of tropical island stream. BioScience. 2003; 53: 1048–1051. 5. Young J, Watt A, Nowicki P, Alard D, Clitherow J, Henle K, et al. Towards sustainable land use: identify- ing and managing the conflicts between human activities and biodiversity conservation in Europe. Biodi- ver Conserv. 2005; 14: 1641–1661. 6. Chapin FS III, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VT, Naylor RL, Vitousek PM, Reynolds HL, et al. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature. 2000; 405: 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1038/35012241 PMID: 10821284 7. Folke C, Holling CS, Perrings C. Biological diversity, ecosystem, and human scale. Ecol Appl. 1996; 6 (4): 1018–1024. 8. Diana JS. Aquaculture production and biodiversity conservation. BioScience. 2009; 59: 27–38. 9. Needles LA, Lester SE, Ambrose R, Andren A, Beyeler M, Connor MS, et al. Managing bay and estua- rine ecosystem for multiple services. Estuaries and Coasts. 2015; 38: 35–48. 10. Fujii K, Doi H, Matsuoka S, Nagano M, Sato H, Yamanaka H. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for

fish community analysis in backwater lake; comparison of capture methods. PLOS ONE. 2019; 14(1): e0210357. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210357 PMID: 30703107 11. Sigsgaard EE, Carl H, Møller PR, Thomsen PF. Monitoring the near-extinct European weather loach in Denmark based on environmental DNA from water samples. Biol Conserv. 2015; 183: 46–52. 12. Thomsen PF, Willerslev E. Environmental DNA–An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biol Conserv. 2015; 183: 4–18. 13. Dejean T, Valentini A, Miquel C, Taberlet P, Bellemain E, Miaud C. Improved detection of an alien inva- sive species through environmental DNA barcoding: the example of the American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus. J Appl Ecol. 2012; 49: 953–959. 14. Keskin E. Detection of invasive freshwater fish species using environmental DNA survey. Biochem Sys- tem Ecol. 2014; 56: 68–74. 15. Ficetola GF, Miaud C, Pompanon F, Taberlet P. Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biol Lett. 2008; 4: 423–425. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0118 PMID: 18400683 16. Dejean T, Valentini A, Duparc A, Pellier-Cuit S, Pompanon F, Taberlet P, et al. Persistence of environ- mental DNA in freshwater ecosystems. PLOS ONE. 2011; 6: e23398. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0023398 PMID: 21858099 17. Jerde C, Mahon A, Chadderton W, Lodge D. Sight-unseen detection of rare aquatic species using envi- ronmental DNA. Conserv Lett. 2011; 4: 150e157. 18. Thomsen PF, Kielgast J, Iversen LL, Wiuf C, Rasmussen M, Gilbert MT, et al. Monitoring endangered

freshwater biodiversityusing environmental DNA. Mol Ecol. 2012; 21: 2565e2573. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05418.x PMID: 22151771 19. Andersen K, Bird KL, Rasmussen M, Haile J, Breuning-Madsen H, Kjaer KH, et al. Metabarcoding of ‘dirt’ DNA from soil reflects vertebrate biodiversity. Mol Ecol. 2012; 21:1966–1979. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05261.x PMID: 21917035 20. Fujiwara A, Matsuhashi S, Doi H, Yamamoto S, Minamoto T. Use of environmental DNA to survey the distribution of an invasive submerged plant in ponds. Freshw Sci. 2016; 35: 748–754. 21. Taberlet P, Coissac E, Hajibabaei M, Reiseberg LH. Environmental DNA. Mol Ecol. 2012; 21:1789– 1793. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05542.x PMID: 22486819 22. Itakura H, Wakiya R, Yamamoto S, Kaifu K, Sato T, Minamoto T. Environmental DNA analysis reveals the spatial distribution, abundance, and biomass of Japanese eels at the river-basin scale. Aquat Con- serve. 2019; 2019: 1–13. 23. Pfleger MO, Rider SJ, Johnston CE, Janosik AM. Saving the doomed: Using eDNA to aid in detection of rare sturgeon for conservation (Acipenseridae). Glob Ecol Conserv. 2016; 8: 99–107. 24. Miya M, Sado T. Multiple species detection using MiFish primers. In: eDNA Methods Standardization Committee editors. Environmental DNA sampling and experimental manual ver. 2.1. The eDNA Soci- ety, Otsu, Japan; 2019. pp. 55–92. 25. Miya M, Minamoto T, Yamanaka H, Oka SI, Sato K, Yamamoto S, et al. Use of a filter cartridge for filtra- tion of water samples and extraction of environmental DNA. JoVE. 2016; 117: e54741.

PLOS ONE Biodiversity of five estuaries PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231127 October 6, 2020 13 / 15