Who tweets climate change papers? investigating publics of research through users’ descriptions
pmc-PMC9165795.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 17 trang
58. Ke Q, Ahn Y-Y, Sugimoto CR. A systematic identification and analysis of scientists on Twitter. PLOS ONE. 2017; 12: e0175368. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175368 PMID: 28399145 59. Birkle C, Pendlebury DA, Schnell J, Adams J. Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies. 2020; 1: 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_ 00018 60. Larivière V, Desrochers N. Langues et diffusion de la recherche: le cas des sciences humaines et sociales. Acfas Magazine. 2015. https://www.acfas.ca/publications/magazine/2015/11/langues- diffusion-recherche-cas-sciences-humaines-sociales 61. Haunschild R, Leydesdorff L, Bornmann L, Hellsten I, Marx W. Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags. Journal of Informetrics. 2019; 13: 695–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.008 62. Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan L, Franc¸ois R, et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse. JOSS. 2019; 4: 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686 63. Wickham H. ggplot2. WIREs Comp Stat. 2011; 3: 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.147 64. Lehmkuhl M, Promies N. Frequency distribution of journalistic attention for scientific studies and scien- tific sources: An input–output analysis. PLOS ONE. 2020; 15: e0241376. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0241376 PMID: 33175868 65. Toupin R, Haustein S. 2nd Codebook for users categorization—Climate change research. figshare;
2019. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.8236598.V3 66. Kelley CP, Mohtadi S, Cane MA, Seager R, Kushnir Y. Climate change in the Fertile Crescent and impli- cations of the recent Syrian drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015; 112: 3241–3246. https://doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.1421533112 PMID: 25733898 67. McGlade C, Ekins P. The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2˚C. Nature. 2015; 517: 187–190. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14016 PMID: 25567285 68. Urban MC. Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science. 2015; 348: 571–573. https://doi. org/10.1126/science.aaa4984 PMID: 25931559 69. Watts N, Adger WN, Agnolucci P, Blackstock J, Byass P, Cai W, et al. Health and climate change: policy responses to protect public health. The Lancet. 2015; 386: 1861–1914. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(15)60854-6 PMID: 26111439 70. Kerr JT, Pindar A, Galpern P, Packer L, Potts SG, Roberts SM, et al. Climate change impacts on bum- blebees converge across continents. Science. 2015; 349: 177–180. https://doi.org/10.1126/science. aaa7031 PMID: 26160945 71. Springmann M, Godfray HCJ, Rayner M, Scarborough P. Analysis and valuation of the health and cli- mate change cobenefits of dietary change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016; 113: 4146–4151. https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.1523119113 PMID: 27001851 72. Sarkar A, Mukherjee AD, Bera MK, Das B, Juyal N, Morthekai P, et al. Oxygen isotope in archaeological bioapatites from India: Implications to climate change and decline of Bronze Age Harappan civilization.
Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 26555. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26555 PMID: 27222033 73. Springmann M, Mason-D’Croz D, Robinson S, Garnett T, Godfray HCJ, Gollin D, et al. Global and regional health effects of future food production under climate change: a modelling study. The Lancet. 2016; 387: 1937–1946. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01156-3 PMID: 26947322 74. Schleuning M, Fru¨ nd J, Schweiger O, Welk E, Albrecht J, Albrecht M, et al. Ecological networks are more sensitive to plant than to animal extinction under climate change. Nature Communications. 2016; 7: 13965. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13965 PMID: 28008919 75. Sanderson FJ, Pople RG, Ieronymidou C, Burfield IJ, Gregory RD, Willis SG, et al. Assessing the Per- formance of EU Nature Legislation in Protecting Target Bird Species in an Era of Climate Change: Impacts of EU nature legislation. Conservation Letters. 2016; 9: 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl. 12196 76. Joubert M, Costas R. Getting to Know Science Tweeters: A Pilot Analysis of South African Twitter Users Tweeting about Research Articles. Journal of Altmetrics. 2019; 2: 2. https://doi.org/10.29024/joa.8 77. Van Bavel JJ. Scientists have passions outside the lab. We should embrace that. Science. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.caredit.acx9560 78. Toupin R, Millerand F, Larivière V. Scholarly communication or public communication of science? Assessing who engage with climate research on Twitter. 17th International Conference on Sciento- metrics & Informetrics. 2019. pp. 2115–2020. https://crc.ebsi.umontreal.ca/publications/scholarly-
communication-or-public-communication-of-science-assessing-who-engage-with-climate-research-on- twitter/ PLOS ONE Who tweets climate change research papers? PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268999 June 3, 2022 17 / 17