Who tweets climate change papers? investigating publics of research through users’ descriptions

36. Pearce W, Holmberg K, Hellsten I, Nerlich B. Climate change on twitter: Topics, communities and con- versations about the 2013 IPCC Working Group 1 report. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e94785. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0094785 PMID: 24718388 37. Walter S, Silva-Schmidt FD, Bru¨ ggemann M. Digital Traces in Context| From “Knowledge Brokers” to Opinion Makers: How Physical Presence Affected Scientists’ Twitter Use During the COP21 Climate Change Conference. International Journal of Communication. 2017; 11: 570–591. 38. Bruns A, Burgess J. Twitter hashtags from ad hoc to calculated publics. In Rambukkana N, editor. Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks. Peter Lang; 2015. pp. 13–28. 39. Thelwall M, Tsou A, Weingart S, Holmberg K, Haustein S. Tweeting Links to Academic Articles. Cyber- metrics: International Journal of Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics. 2013; 17: 1–8. 40. Holmberg K, Hellsten I. Twitter Campaigns Around the Fifth IPCC Report: Campaign Spreading, Shared Hashtags, and Separate Communities. SAGE Open. 2016;6: 2158244016659117. https://doi. org/10.1177/2158244016659117 41. Moukarzel S, Rehm M, del Fresno M, Daly AJ. Diffusing science through social networks: The case of breastfeeding communication on Twitter. PLoS ONE. 2020; 15: e0237471. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0237471 PMID: 32790712 42. Moscrop D, Wong L, Alperin JP. Have You Seen This? Why Political Pundits Share Scholarly Research on Social Media. Scholarly and Research Communication. 2020; 11: 21. https://doi.org/10.22230/src. 2020v11n1a355

43. Yeo SK, Su LY-F, Cacciatore MA, McKasy M, Qian S. Predicting Intentions to Engage With Scientific Messages on Twitter: The Roles of Mirth and Need for Humor. Science Communication. 2020; 42: 481– 507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020942512 44. Leas EC, Althouse BM, Dredze M, Obradovich N, Fowler JH, Noar SM, et al. Big Data Sensors of Organic Advocacy: The Case of Leonardo DiCaprio and Climate Change. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11: e0159885. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159885 PMID: 27482907 45. Kwak H, Lee C, Park H, Moon S. What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web—WWW ‘10. ACM Press; 2010. p. 591. https://doi.org/ 10.1145/1772690.1772751 46. Haustein S, Toupin R, Alperin JP. “Not sure if scientist or just Twitter bot” Or: Who tweets about schol- arly papers. Altmetric. 12 Jul 2018. https://www.altmetric.com/blog/not-sure-if-scientist-or-just-twitter- bot-or-who-tweets-about-scholarly-papers/ 47. Mislove A, Lehmann S, Ahn Y-Y, Onnela J-P, Rosenquist JN. Understanding the Demographics of Twit- ter Users. ICWSM. 2011. pp. 554–557. 48. Pew Research Center. Sizing Up Twitter Users. Pew Research Center; 2019. https://www. pewresearch.org/internet/2019/04/24/sizing-up-twitter-users/ 49. Work S, Haustein S, Bowman TD, Larivière V. Social Media in Scholarly Communication. A Review of the Literature and Empirical Analysis of Twitter Use by SSHRC Doctoral Award Recipients. Social Sci- ences and Humanities Research Centre; 2015. https://crctcs.openum.ca/files/sites/60/2015/12/

SSHRC_SocialMediainScholarlyCommunication.pdf 50. Domenget J-C. Usages professionnels et figures d’usager des me´dias socionume´ riques. Revue fran- c¸aise des sciences de l’information et de la communication. 2015;6. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfsic.1325 51. Coˆte´ IM, Darling ES. Scientists on Twitter: Preaching to the choir or singing from the rooftops? FAC- ETS. 2018; 3: 682–694. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2018-0002 52. Carlson J, Harris K. Quantifying and contextualizing the impact of bioRxiv preprints through automated social media audience segmentation. PLoS Biology. 2020; 18: e3000860. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pbio.3000860 PMID: 32960891 53. Tsou A, Bowman TD, Ghazinejad A, Sugimoto CR. Who tweets about science? Proceedings of the 2015 international society for scientometrics and informetrics. 2015. pp. 95–100. 54. Bex RT, Lundgren L, Crippen KJ. Scientific Twitter: The flow of paleontological communication across a topic network. PLOS ONE. 2019; 14: e0219688. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219688 PMID: 31361749 55. How does Altmetric track Twitter. DS Metrics [Internet]. [cited 23 May 2021]. https://help.altmetric.com/ support/solutions/articles/6000235926-twitter 56. Holmberg K, Bowman TD, Haustein S, Peters I. Astrophysicists’ Conversational Connections on Twit- ter. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e106086. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106086 PMID: 25153196 57. Costas R, Mongeon P, Ferreira MR, van Honk J, Franssen T. Large-scale identification and characteri-

zation of scholars on Twitter. Quantitative Science Studies. 2020; 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_ 00047 PLOS ONE Who tweets climate change research papers? PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268999 June 3, 2022 16 / 17