Who tweets climate change papers? investigating publics of research through users’ descriptions

Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press; 2013. http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf 15. Tandoc EC Jr, Eng N. Climate Change Communication on Facebook, Twitter, Sina Weibo, and Other Social Media Platforms. Oxford Research Encyclopedia: Climate Science. 2017. https://doi.org/10. 1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.361 16. Walter S, Lo¨ rcher I, Bru¨ggemann M. Scientific networks on Twitter: Analyzing scientists’ interactions in the climate change debate. Public Understanding of Science. 2019; 28: 696–712. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0963662519844131 PMID: 31027461 17. Newman TP. Tracking the release of IPCC AR5 on Twitter: Users, comments, and sources following the release of the Working Group I Summary for Policymakers. Public Understanding of Science. 2017; 26: 815–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516628477 PMID: 26868025 18. Bolsen T, Shapiro MA. Strategic Framing and Persuasive Messaging to Influence Climate Change Per- ceptions and Decisions. Oxford Research Encyclopedia: Climate Science. 2017. https://doi.org/10. 1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.385 19. van Eck CW, Mulder BC, Dewulf A. Online Climate Change Polarization: Interactional Framing Analysis of Climate Change Blog Comments. Science Communication. 2020; 42: 454–480. https://doi.org/10. 1177/1075547020942228 20. Hestres LE, Hopke JE. Internet-Enabled Activism and Climate Change. Oxford Research Encyclope- dia: Climate Science. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.404

21. Holmberg DK, Hellsten DI. Organizational Communication on Twitter: Differences Between Non-Profit and For-Profit Organizations in the Context of Climate Change. In Schmidt CM, editor. Crossmedia- Kommunikation in kulturbedingten Handlungsra¨ umen. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; 2016. pp. 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11076-5_16 22. Segerberg A, Bennett WL. Social Media and the Organization of Collective Action: Using Twitter to Explore the Ecologies of Two Climate Change Protests. The Communication Review. 2011; 14: 197– 215. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2011.597250 23. Segerberg A. Online and Social Media Campaigns for Climate Change Engagement. Oxford Research Encyclopedia: Climate Science. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.398 24. Jahng MR, Lee N. When Scientists Tweet for Social Changes: Dialogic Communication and Collective Mobilization Strategies by Flint Water Study Scientists on Twitter. Science Communication. 2018; 40: 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017751948 25. Bowman TD. Investigating the use of affordances and framing techniques by scholars to manage per- sonal and professional impressions on Twitter. Dissertation, Indiana University. 2015. 26. Holmberg K, Thelwall M. Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication. Scientometrics. 2014; 101: 1027–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1229-3 27. Priem J. Altmetrics. In Cronin B, Sugimoto CR, editors. Beyond bibliometrics: harnessing multidimen- sional indicators of performance. MIT Press; 2014. pp. 263–287.

28. Vainio J, Holmberg K. Highly tweeted science articles: who tweets them? An analysis of Twitter user profile descriptions. Scientometrics. 2017; 112: 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2368-0 29. Bornmann L, Haunschild R, Marx W. Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents? Scientometrics. 2016; 109: 1477–1495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2115-y PMID: 27942080 30. Haustein S, Bowman TD, Costas R. Interpreting “altmetrics”: Viewing acts on social media through the lens of citation and social theories. In Sugimoto CR, editor. Theories of Informetrics and Scholarly Com- munication. De Gruyter Mouton; 2016. pp. 372–405. 31. Kassab O, Bornmann L, Haunschild R. Can altmetrics reflect societal impact considerations: Exploring the potential of altmetrics in the context of a sustainability science research center. Quantitative Science Studies. 2020; 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00032 32. Alperin JP, Gomez CJ, Haustein S. Identifying diffusion patterns of research articles on Twitter: A case study of online engagement with open access articles. Public Understanding of Science. 2018; 28: 2– 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518761733 PMID: 29607775 33. Haunschild R, Bornmann L, Marx W. Climate Change Research in View of Bibliometrics. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11: e0160393. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160393 PMID: 27472663 34. IPCC. Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth

Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPPC—Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 2014, p. 151. 35. Hopke JE, Hestres LE. Visualizing the Paris Climate Talks on Twitter: Media and Climate Stakeholder Visual Social Media During COP21. Social Media + Society. 2018; 4: 2056305118782687. https://doi. org/10.1177/2056305118782687 PLOS ONE Who tweets climate change research papers? PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268999 June 3, 2022 15 / 17