Who tweets climate change papers? investigating publics of research through users’ descriptions

Author Contributions Conceptualization: Re´mi Toupin, Florence Millerand, Vincent Larivière. Data curation: Re´mi Toupin. Formal analysis: Re´mi Toupin. Funding acquisition: Re´mi Toupin, Florence Millerand, Vincent Larivière. Investigation: Re´mi Toupin. Methodology: Re´mi Toupin. Project administration: Re´mi Toupin, Florence Millerand, Vincent Larivière. Resources: Florence Millerand, Vincent Larivière. Supervision: Florence Millerand, Vincent Larivière. Validation: Re´mi Toupin, Florence Millerand, Vincent Larivière. Visualization: Re´mi Toupin. Writing – original draft: Re´mi Toupin. Writing – review & editing: Re´mi Toupin, Florence Millerand, Vincent Larivière. References 1. Haustein S. Scholarly Twitter Metrics. In Gla¨nzel W, Moed HF, Schmoch U, Thelwall M, editors. Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer; 2019. pp. 729–760. 2. Priem J, Taraborelli D, Groth P, Neylon C. Altmetrics: a manifesto. 2010. http://altmetrics.org/ manifesto/ 3. Sugimoto CR, Work S, Larivière V, Haustein S. Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2017; 68: 2037– 2062. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23833 4. Dı´az-Faes AA, Bowman TD, Costas R. Towards a second generation of ‘social media metrics’: Charac- terizing Twitter communities of attention around science. PLOS ONE. 2019; 14: e0216408. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216408 PMID: 31116783 5. Araujo RF. Communities of attention networks: introducing qualitative and conversational perspectives

for altmetrics. Scientometrics. 2020; 124: 1793–1809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03566-7 6. Bruns A. After the ‘APIcalypse’: social media platforms and their fight against critical scholarly research. Information, Communication & Society. 2019; 22: 1544–1566. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019. 1637447 7. Puschmann C. An end to the wild west of social media research: a response to Axel Bruns. Information, Communication & Society. 2019; 22: 1582–1589. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1646300 8. Bruns A, Weller K. Twitter data analytics–or: the pleasures and perils of studying Twitter. Aslib Journal of Information Management. 2014;66. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-02-2014-0027 9. Crawford K. Atlas of Ai: power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2021. 10. D’Ignazio C, Klein LF. Data Feminism. MIT Press; 2020. https://data-feminism.mitpress.mit.edu/ 11. Ripple WJ, Wolf C, Newsome TM, Barnard P, Moomaw WR. World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency. BioScience. 2020; 70: 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz088 12. Watts N, Amann M, Ayeb-Karlsson S, Belesova K, Bouley T, Boykoff M, et al. The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: from 25 years of inaction to a global transformation for public health. The Lancet. 2018; 391: 581–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32464-9 PMID: 29096948 13. Besley J, Dudo A. Scientists’ Views about Public Engagement and Science Communication in the Con- text of Climate Change. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.380

14. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, et al., editors. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis Contribution of Working Group I to the PLOS ONE Who tweets climate change research papers? PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268999 June 3, 2022 14 / 17