Thông tin tài nguyên

Impact of transgenic insect-resistant maize HGK60 with Cry1Ah gene on community components and biodiversity of arthropods in the fields

pmc-PMC9165892.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 13 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 12 · Đoạn 30Vị trí nguồn

18. Singh AK, Dubey SK. Current trends in Bt crops and their fate on associated microbial community dynamics: a review. Protoplasma, 2016, 253(3):663–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-015-0903-5 PMID: 26560114 19. El-Wakeil N. Monitoring of key non-target arthropods in insect-resistant transgenic maize lines during 2010 and 2011 in field studies in central Germany[C]// Gmos. 2013. 20. Perumal V, Thangaraj K, Sengodan K, Sengottayan SN, Muthugoundar S. Toxicity of Beauveria bassi- ana-28 Mycelial Extracts on Larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae). Interna- tional Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, 2018, 15(3):440. 21. Vasantha-Srinivasan P, Karthi S, Chellappandian M, Ponsankar A, Thanigaivel A, Senthil-Nathan S, Chandramohan D, Ganesan R. Aspergillus flavus (Link) toxins reduces the fitness of dengue vector Aedes aegypti (Linn.) and their non-target toxicity against aquatic predator. Microbial Pathogenesis, 2019. 22. Wang M, Guan X. The effects of phytase transgenic maize on the community components and diversity of arthropods. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 2020, 23(4):1228–1234. 23. Zheng LY, Gui H. Insert Classfication. Nanjing: Nan Jing Normal University Press, 1999. 24. Hao SG, Zhang XX, Chen XN, Luo YJ, Tial XZ. The dynamics of biodiversity and the composition of nutrition classes and dominant guilds of arthropodacommunity in paddy field. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 1998, 41: 343–353. 25. Ma KP. Method for measuring diversity of biological community diversity: I. Measure method of al- pha

Trang 12 · Đoạn 31Vị trí nguồn

diversity. Biodiversity Science. 1994, 2(3): 162–168. 26. Pielou EC. MathematicalEcology. New York: John Wiley, 1977. 27. Yin XQ. Study on the Forest Soil Animal in Northeast China. Chuangchun: Northeast Normal Univer- sity Press, 2001. 28. Ma KP, Liu YM. Measurement of bioticcommunity diversity II β diversity. Biodiversity Science, 1995, 3 (1): 38–43. 29. Jiang JX, Wan NF, Ji XY, Dan JG. Diversity and stability of arthropod community in peach orchard under effects of ground cover vegetation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(9): 2303– 2308. PMID: 22126040 30. Naranjo SE, Head G, Dively GP. Field studies assessing arthropod nontarget effects in Bt transgenic crops: Introduction. Environmental Entomology, 2005; 34: 1178–1180. 31. Marvier M, Mccreedy C, Regetz J, Kareiva P. A meta-analysis of effects of Bt cotton and maize on non- target invertebrates. Science, 2007, 316: 1475–1477. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139208 PMID: 17556584 32. Farinos GP, Mdela P, Herna´ ndezcrespo P, Ortego F, Castanera P. Diversity and seasonal phenology of aboveground arthropods in conventional and transgenic maize crops in central Spain. Biological Con- trol, 2008, 44:362–371. 33. Guo J, He K, Hellmich R.L, Bai S, Zhang T, Liu Y, et al. 2016. Field trials to evaluate the effects of trans- genic cry1Ie maize on the community characteristics of arthropod natural enemies. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1):22102. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22102 PMID: 26915985 34. Yin JQ, Wu FC, Zhou L, Song X. Impacts of a transgenic insect-resistant maize (Bt-799) containing a

Trang 12 · Đoạn 32Vị trí nguồn

Cry1Ac gene on arthropod biodiversity. Journal of biosafety, 2017, 26(02): 159–167. 35. Guo JF, Zhang C, Yuan ZH, He KL, Wang ZY. Impacts of transgenic corn with cry1Ie gene on arthropod biodiversity in the fields. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 2014, 41(4): 482–489. 36. Habustova O S, Svobodova Z, Spitzer L, Dolezˇal P, Hussein HM, Sehnal F. Communities of ground- dwelling arthropods in conventional and transgenic maize: background data for the post-market envi- ronmental monitoring. Journal of Applied Entomology, 2015, 139(1/2): 31–45. 37. Horak MJ, Rosenbaum EW, Phillips SL, Kendrick DL, Carson D, Clark PL, et al. Plant characterization of the ecological interactions of Roundup Ready 2 Yield® soybean, MON 89788, for use in ecological risk assessment. Transgenic Research, 2015, 24: 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-014-9839- 3 PMID: 25248506 38. Ding R, Ma D, Uwais A, Wang D, Pan H. Transgenic Cry1Ac cotton does not affect the development and fecundity of Chrysoperla carnea. PLos one, 2019, 14(4): e0214668–e0214668. https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pone.0214668 PMID: 30951546 39. Tian JC, Wang XP, Chen Y, Romeis J, Naranjo SE, Hellmich RL, et al. Bt cotton producing Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab does not harm two parasitoids, Cotesia marginiventris and Copidosoma floridanum. Rep, 2018, 8(1):307. 40. Tian JC, Yang C, Li ZL, Li K, Chen M, Peng YF, et al. Transgenic Cry1Ab Rice Does Not Impact Eco- logical Fitness and Predation of a Generalist Spider. Plos One, 2012, 7(4):e35164. https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pone.0035164 PMID: 22511982 PLOS ONE

Trang 12 · Đoạn 33Vị trí nguồn

Impact of transgenic insect-resistant maize HGK60 with Cry1Ah gene PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269459 June 3, 2022 12 / 13