Evaluating conservation biology texts for bias in biodiversity representation

student that has a less biased understanding of the world, and will be motivated and better pre- pared to share their appreciation and stewardship of less well-known and less-charismatic species. Supporting information S1 Data. Evaluating conservation biology texts published data file. (XLSX) Acknowledgments We would like to thank Clinton Jenkins, Michael R Donaldson, and Bruce A Stein for com- ments on the draft manuscript. Author Contributions Conceptualization: Christopher A. Lepczyk, Rebecca A. Christoffel. Formal analysis: Katherine Stahl. Investigation: Katherine Stahl. Methodology: Christopher A. Lepczyk. Supervision: Christopher A. Lepczyk, Rebecca A. Christoffel. Writing – original draft: Katherine Stahl. Writing – review & editing: Christopher A. Lepczyk, Rebecca A. Christoffel. References 1. Clark J.A., and May R.M. 2002. Taxonomic Bias in Conservation Research. Science 297:191–192. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.297.5579.191b PMID: 12117005 2. Donaldson M.R., Burnett N.J., Braun D.C., Suski C.D., Hinch S.G., Cooke S.J., et al. 2016. Taxonomic bias and international biodiversity conservation research. FACETS 1:105–113. 3. Chapman A.D. 2009. Numbers of living species in Australia and the world. Australia, Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Australian Biodiversity Information Services. Canberra, ACT: Australian Biological Resources Study. 4. Christoffel R.A., and Lepczyk C.A. 2012. Representation of herpetofauna in wildlife research journals. The Journal of Wildlife Management 76:661–669.

5. Seddon P.J., Soorae P.S., and Launay F. 2005. Taxonomic bias in reintroduction projects. Animal Con- servation 8:51–58. 6. Stein B.A., Master L.L., Morse L.E., Clark J.A., and May R.M. 2002. Taxonomic bias and vulnerable species. Science 297:1807–1807. 7. Troudet J., Grandcolas P., Bliz A., Vignes-Lebbe R., and Legendre F. 2017. Taxonomic bias in biodiver- sity data and societal preferences. Scientific Reports 7:9132. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017- 09084-6 PMID: 28831097 8. Hecnar S.J. 2009. Human bias and the biodiversity knowledge base: An examination of the published literature on vertebrates. Biodiversity 10:18–24. 9. James A.N., Green M.J.B., and Paine J.R. 1999. A Global Review of Protected Area Budgets and Staff- ing. WCMC–World Conservation Press, Cambridge, UK. vi + 46pp. 10. Baillie J., Hilton-Taylor C., and Stuart S.N. 2004. 2004 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: A Global Species Assessment. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK. 11. Siqueira T., Bini L.M., Thomaz S.M., and Fontaneto D. 2015. Biodiversity analyses: are aquatic ecolo- gists doing any better than terrestrial ecologists? Hydrobiologia 750:5–12. 12. Sodhi N.S., and Ehrlich P.R. 2010. Conservation biology for all. Oxford: Oxford University Press. PLOS ONE Bias in conservation biology textbooks PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234877 July 10, 2020 10 / 11