Education for all in action: Measuring teachers’ competences for inclusive education

56. Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Mu¨ ller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of psychological research online. 2003; 8(2):23–74. 57. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, third: New York: The Guilford Press; 2011. 58. Habarth JM. Development of the heteronormative attitudes and beliefs scale. Psychology & Sexuality. 2015; 6(2):166–88. 59. Ruijs NM, Peetsma TTD. Effects of inclusion on students with and without special educational needs reviewed. Educational Research Review. 2009; 4(2):67–79. 60. ILGA-Europe. Rainbow Europe 2020 2020 [21/08/2020]. Available from: https://www.ilga-europe.org/ rainboweurope/2020. 61. Dixon FA, Yssel N, McConnell JM, Hardin T. Differentiated instruction, professional development, and teacher efficacy. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 2014; 37(2):111–27. 62. Tomlinson CA, Moon TR. Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. Alexandria: ASCD; 2013. 63. Dom L. Ouders en scholen: Academia Press; 2006. 64. Hattie J. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge; 2008. 65. Henderson AT, Mapp KL. A new wave of evidence. Austin (Texas): National Center for Family & Com- munity: Connections with Schools; 2002. 66. Zumbo BD, Chan EK. Validity and validation in social, behavioral, and health sciences. London: Springer; 2014. 67. Commissie_Diversiteit. Diversiteit binnen het onderwijzend personeel. Brussels: SERV; 2020. PLOS ONE

Measuring teachers’ competences for inclusive education PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291033 November 8, 2023 22 / 22