Thông tin tài nguyên

Exploring the effects of habitat management on grassland biodiversity: A case study from northern Serbia

pmc-PMC10977728.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 19 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 16 · Đoạn 41Vị trí nguồn

Investigation: Dubravka Milić, Milica Rat, Bojana Bokić, Sonja Mudri-Stojnić, Boris Radak, Tamara Tot, Dusˇanka Vujanović, Goran Anačkov, Dimitrije Radisˇić. Methodology: Dubravka Milić, Milica Rat, Dimitrije Radisˇić. Software: Nemanja Milosˇević, Natasˇa Sukur, Dusˇan Jakovetić. Supervision: Dubravka Milić. Visualization: Dubravka Milić, Nemanja Milosˇević, Natasˇa Sukur, Dusˇan Jakovetić. Writing – original draft: Dubravka Milić, Milica Rat, Bojana Bokić, Sonja Mudri-Stojnić, Nemanja Milosˇević, Dimitrije Radisˇić. Writing – review & editing: Dubravka Milić, Milica Rat. References 1. Habel JC, Dengler J, Janisˇova´ M, To¨ro¨k P, Wellstein C, Wiezik M. European grassland ecosystems: threatened hotspots of biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv. 2013; 22: 2131–2138. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10531-013-0537-x 2. Klaus F, Tscharntke T, Uhler J, Grass I. Calcareous grassland fragments as sources of bee pollinators for the surrounding agricultural landscape. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2021; 26: e01474. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.gecco.2021.e01474 3. Poschlod P, Wallis de Vries M F. The historical and socioeconomic perspective of calcareous grass- lands lessons from the distant and recent past. Biol Conserv, 2002; 104: 361–76. https://doi.org/10. 1016/S0006-3207(01)00201-4 4. Ha´jkova´ P, Roleček J, Ha´jek M, Horsa´ k M, Fajmon K, Pola´ k M, et al. Prehistoric origin of the extremely species-rich semi-dry grasslands in the Bı´le´ Karpaty Mts (Czech Republic and Slovakia). Preslia. 2011; 83: 185–204.

Trang 16 · Đoạn 42Vị trí nguồn

5. WallisDeVries MF, Poschlod P, Willems JH. Challenges for the conservation of calcareous grasslands in northwestern Europe: integrating the requirements of flora and fauna. Biol Conserv. 2002; 104 (3): 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00191-4 6. Valko´ O, To¨ ro¨ k P, Matus G, To´ thme´re´sz B. Is regular mowing the most appropriate and cost-effective management maintaining diversity and biomass of target forbs in mountain hay meadows? Flora. 2012; 207: 303–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2012.02.003 7. Hayward MW. Conservation management for the past, present and future. Biodivers Conserv. 2009; 18; 765–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9436-y 8. Bartha S, Meiners SJ, Pickett STA, Cadenasso M.L. Plant colonization windows in a mesic old field suc- cession. Appl Veg Sci. 2003; 6: 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2003.tb00581.x. 9. Vira´gh K, Bartha S. Species turnover as a function of vegetation pattern. Tiscia. 2003; 34: 47–56. 10. Teleki B, Sonkoly J, Erdős L, To´thme´ re´ sz B, Prommer M, To¨ ro¨ k P. High resistance of plant biodiversity to moderate native woody encroachment in loess steppe grassland fragments. Appl Veg Sci. 2020; 23: 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12474 11. Ba´ ldi A, Bata´ ryc P, Kleijn D. Effects of grazing and biogeographic regions on grassland biodiversity in Hungary–analysing assemblages of 1200 species. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2013; 166: 28–34. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.03.005 12. Kormann U, Ro¨sch V, Bata´ry P, Tscharntke T, Orci MK, Samu F, et al. Local and landscape manage-

Trang 16 · Đoạn 43Vị trí nguồn

ment drive trait-mediated biodiversity of nine taxa on small grassland fragments. Divers Distrib. 2015; 21: 1204–1217. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12324 13. van Klink R, van der Plas ALD, van Noordwijk CGE, WallisDeVries MF, Olf H. Effects of large herbi- vores on grassland arthropod diversity. Biol Rev. 2015; 90: 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12113 PMID: 24837856 14. Polasky S, Nelson E, Lonsdorf E, Fackler P, Starfield A. Conserving species in a working landscape: land use with biological and economic objectives. Ecol Appl, 2005; 15: 1387–1401. 15. Johst K, Drechsler M, Mewes M, Sturm A, Wa¨ tzold F. A novel modeling approach to evaluate the eco- logical effects of timing and location of grassland conservation measures. Biol Conserv. 2015; 182: 44– 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.033 16. To¨ ro¨ k P, Dembicz I, Dajić-Stevanović Z, Kuzemko A. Grasslands of Eastern Europe. In: Goldstein MI, DellaSala DA, editors. Encyclopedia of the World’s Biomes, 2020. pp. 703–713. https://doi.org/10. 1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.12042-1 PLOS ONE Effects of habitat management on biodiversity PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301391 March 28, 2024 16 / 19

Trang 17 · Đoạn 44Vị trí nguồn

17. Jauker B, Krauss J, Jauker F, Steffan-Dewenter I. Linking life history traits to pollinator loss in frag- mented calcareous grasslands. Landsc Ecol. 2013; 28:107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012- 9820-6 18. Lennartsson T, Wissman J, Bergstro¨m HM. The Effect of Timing of Grassland Management on Plant Reproduction. Int J Ecol. 2012; 156274. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/156274 19. Bonari G, Fajmonc K, Malenovsky´ I, Zeleny´ D, Holusˇaf J, Jongepierova´ c I, et al. Management of semi- natural grasslands benefiting both plant and insect diversity: The importance of heterogeneity and tradi- tion. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2017; 246: 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.06.010 20. Bendel CR, Hovick TJ, Limb RF, Harmon JP. Variation in grazing management practices supports diverse butterfy communities across grassland working landscapes. J Insect Conserv. 2018; 22; 99– 111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-017-0041-9 21. Bussan S. Can cattle grazing beneft grassland butterfies? J Insect Conserv. 2022; 26: 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-022-00373-8. 22. Barber NA, Sauer N, Krauss J,�Boetzl FA. Grazing conserves threatened carabid beetles in semi-natu- ral calcareous grasslands better than mowing, especially at low intensities. Biodivers Conserv. 2022; 31: 2857–2873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02463-0 23. O¨ ckinger E, Smith HG. Semi-natural grasslands as population sources for pollinating insects in agricul- tural landscapes. J Appl Ecol. 2006; 44(1): 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01250.x

Trang 17 · Đoạn 45Vị trí nguồn

24. O¨ ckinger E, Lindborg R, Sjo¨ din NE, Bommarco R. Landscape matrix modifies richness of plants and insects in grassland fragments. Ecography. 2012; 35: 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587. 2011.06870.x 25. Me´rő TO, La´szlo´ L, Lengyel S. Habitat management varying in space and time: the effects of grazing and fire management on marshland birds. J Ornithol. 2015; 156: 579–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10336-015-1202-9. 26. Toivonen M, Herzon I, Kuussaari M. Differing effects of fallow type and landscape structure on the occurrence of plants, pollinators and birds on environmental fallows in Finland. Biol Conserv. 2015; 181: 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.10.034 27. Bukurov B. Physical and geographical problems of Bačka. Serbian Academy of Science and Arts; 1975. [In Serbian] 28. Butorac B, Panjković B. Sandy vegetation in AP Vojvodina. Institute for Nature Conservation of Vojvo- dina province; 2013. [In Serbian with summary in English] 29. Butorac B, Habijan-Mikesˇ V, Vider V. Sanddunes in Yugoslavia (Vojvodina). Grafoprodukt; 2002. [In Serbian] 30. Gajić M. Flora and vegetation of Subotica-Horgosˇ sands. Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade and Forest management, 1986. [in Serbian] 31. Josifović M. Flora of Serbia 1–8, 1st edition. Serbian Academy of Science and Art, 1970–1976. [in Serbian] 32. Josifović M. Flora of Serbia 9, supplement, 1st edition. Serbian Academy of Science and Art, 1977. [in Serbian] 33. Ja´ vorka S, Csapody V. Iconographia florae partis austro-orientalis Europae centralis. Budapest: Akade´ - mia, 1975.

Trang 17 · Đoạn 46Vị trí nguồn

34. Sarić M. Flora Srbije 10, supplement, 1st edition. Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti, 1986. [in Serbian]. 35. Sarić M. Flora Srbije 1, 2nd edition. Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti, 1992. [in Serbian]. 36. Kira´ly G. U´ j magyar fu¨ ve´szko¨nyv I-II.—Magyarorsza´g hajta´sos no¨ve´ nyei. Aggteleki Nemzeti Park Igaz- gato´ sa´g, 2011. 37. Stevanović V. Flora Srbije 2, 2nd edition. Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti, 2012. [in Serbian]. 38. Borhidi A. Social behaviour types, the naturalness and relative ecological indicator values of the higher plants in the Hungarian flora. Acta Bot Hung. 1995; 39: 97–181. 39. Mudri-Stojnić S, Andrić A, Jo´zan Z, Vujić A. Pollinator diversity (Hymenoptera and Diptera) in semi-nat- ural habitats in Serbia during summer. Arch Biol Sci. 2012; 64(2): 777–7862. https://doi.org/10.2298/ ABS1202777S 40. Mauss V. Bestimmungsschlu¨ ssel fu¨r die Hummeln der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 1992; 51. Deutscher Jugendbund fu¨ r Naturbeobachtung. Offsetdruckerei Hamburg. 41. Amiet F. Insecta helvatica, fauna 12, herausgegeben von der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft. 1996; 98. Redaktor: dr D. Burckhardt. 12 Hymenoptera Apidae, 1. Teil. Allgemeiner tel, gattungsschlu¨ssel, die gattungen Apis, Bombus und Psithyrus. Solothurn PLOS ONE Effects of habitat management on biodiversity PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301391 March 28, 2024 17 / 19

Trang 18 · Đoạn 47Vị trí nguồn

42. Schmid-Egger C, Scheuchl E. Illustrierte Bestimmungstabellen der Wildbienen Deutschlands und Osterreichs unter Berucksichtigung der Arten der Schweiz Band III: Andrenidae. 1997; 180. Gedruckt mit finanzieller Unterstiitzung des Ehepaars Standfuss, Dortmund, und des Bundes fiir Umwelt und Nat- urschutz Dcutschland c.V. (B.U.N.D.) ISBN 3-00-001407-1 43. Scheuchl E. Illustrierte Bestimmungstabellen der Wildbienen Deutschlands und O¨ sterreichs. Band I: Anthophoridae. (2. erweiterte Auflage). 2000; 158. Presinger KG, Landshut. ISBN 3-00-006885-6 44. Vujić, A. 1992. Taxonomic position and zoogeographic analysis of the genus Cheilosia and related gen- era (Diptera: Syrphidae) in the Balkan Peninsula. Doctoral Dissertation. Faculty of Sciences. University of Novi Sad [in Serbian]. 45. Speight M.C.D., Sarthou J.-P. 2017. StN keys for the identification of the European species of various genera of Syrphidae 2017. Syrph the Net, the database of European Syrphidae (Diptera), Vol. 99, 139 pp, Syrph the Net publications, Dublin. 46. Likov L, Vujić A, Kočisˇ Tubić N, an M, Veličković N, Rojo S, et al. 2020. Systematic position and compo- sition of Merodon nigritarsis and M. avidus groups (Diptera, Syrphidae) with a description of four new hoverflies species. Contrib. to Zool. 89(1), 74–125. https://doi.org/10.1163/18759866-20191414 47. Keller V, Herrando S, Vořı´sˇek P, Franch M, Kipson M, Milanesi P, et al. European Breeding Bird Atlas 2: Distribution, Abundance and Change. European Bird Census Council & Lynx Edicions, 2020.

Trang 18 · Đoạn 48Vị trí nguồn

48. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res. 2004; 33:261–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644 49. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2022. URL https://www.R-project.org/. 50. Oksanen J, Simpson G, Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P, et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package_. R package version 2.6–4, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan, 2022. 51. de Mendiburu F. agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research_. R package version 1.3–5. 2021. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae 52. Wickham H, Franc¸ois R, Henry L, Mu¨ ller K, Vaughan D. dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation_. R package version 1.1.2, 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr. 53. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, 2016. 54. Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics with S ( 4th ed.). Springer, 2002. 55. Debeljak M, Dzˇeroski S. Decision Trees in Ecological Modelling. In: Jopp F, Reuter H, Breckling B, edi- tors. Modelling Complex Ecological Dynamics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011. https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-642-05029-9_14 56. Ferna´ ndez A, Garcı´a S, Herrera F, Chawla NV. SMOTE from Imbalanced Data: Progress and Chal- lenges, Marking the 15-year Anniversary. J Artif Intell Res. 2018; 61: 863–905. https://doi.org/10.1613/ jair.1.11192

Trang 18 · Đoạn 49Vị trí nguồn

57. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learn- ing in Python. J Mach Learn Res. 2011; 12: 2825–2830. 58. The pandas development team. pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas (v2.0.2). Zenodo. 2023. https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7979740. 59. Harris CR, Millman KJ, Van Der Walt SJ, Gommers R, Virtanen P, Cournapeau D, et al. Array program- ming with NumPy. Nature. 2020; 585(7825): 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 PMID: 32939066 60. Gordon B, Fennessy C, Varma S, Barrett J, McCondochie E, Heritage T, et al. Evaluation of freely avail- able data profiling tools for health data research application: a functional evaluation review. BMJ open, 2022; 12(5): e054186. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054186 PMID: 35534084 61. Chen T, He T, Benesty M, Khotilovich V, Tang Y, Cho H, et al. Xgboost: extreme gradient boosting. R package version 0.4–2, 1(4), 2015. 62. WallisDeVries MF, Van Swaay CAM, Plate CL. Changes in nectar supply: A possible cause of wide- spread butterfly decline. Curr Zool. 2012; 58: 384–391. https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/58.3.384 63. Huang X, McNeill M, Zhang Z. Quantitative Analysis of Plant Consumption and Preference by Oedaleus asiaticus (Acrididae: Oedipodinae) in Changed Plant Communities Consisting of Three Grass Species. Environ Entomol. 2016; 45: 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvv172. PMID: 26577863 64. Kun R, Babai D, Csatho´ A I, Vada´sz C, Ka´ lma´n N, Ma´te´ A, et al. Simplicity or complexity? Important

Trang 18 · Đoạn 50Vị trí nguồn

aspects of high nature value grassland management in nature conservation. Biodivers Conserv. 2021; 30: 3563–3583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02262-z. 65. Tanenzap A, Daykin G, Fennell T, Hearna E, Wilkinson M, Carey PD, et al. Trade-offs between passive and trophic rewilding for biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Biol Conserv. 2023; 281: 110005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110005 PLOS ONE Effects of habitat management on biodiversity PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301391 March 28, 2024 18 / 19

Trang 19 · Đoạn 51Vị trí nguồn

66. Chabuz W, Kulik M, Sawicka-Zugaj W, Żo´łkiewski P, Warda M, Pluta M, et al. Impact of the type of use of permanent grasslands areas in mountainous regions on the floristic diversity of habitats and animal welfare. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2019; 19: e00629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00629 67. So¨ derstro¨ m B, Svensson B, Vessby K, Glimska¨ r A. Plants, insects and birds in semi-natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factors. Biodivers Conserv. 2001; 10: 1839–1863. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1013153427422 68. Morandin LA, Kremen C. Hedgerow restoration promotes pollinator populations and exports native bees to adjacent fields. Ecol Appl. 2013; 23(4), 829–839. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-1051.1 PMID: 23865233 69. Donkersley P. Tress for bees. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2019; 270–271: 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. agee.2018.10.024 70. Krahulec F, Skalova H, Herben T, Hadincova´ V, Wildova´ R, Pecha´ čkova´ S. Vegetation changes follow- ing sheep grazing in abandoned mountain meadows. Appl Veg Sci. 2001; 4: 97–102. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1654-109X.2001.tb00239.x. 71. Hellstro¨m K, Huhta AP, Rautio P, Tuomi J, Oksanen J, Laine K. Use of sheep grazing in the restoration of semi-natural meadows in northern Finland. Appl Veg Sci. 2003; 6: 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1654-109X.2003.tb00563.x 72. Danner N, Molitor AM, Schiele S, Ha¨ rtel S, Steffan-Dewenter I. Season and landscape composition affect pollen foraging distances and habitat use of honey bees. Ecol Appl. 2016; 26(6):1920–1929. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-1840.1 PMID: 27755712.

Trang 19 · Đoạn 52Vị trí nguồn

73. Carvell C. Habitat use and conservation of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) under different grassland man- agement regimes. Biol Conserv. 2002; 103: 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00114-8 74. Holzschuh A, Dainese M, Gonza´lez-Varo JP, Mudri-Stojnić S, Riedinger V, Rundlo¨f M, et al. Mass-flow- ering crops dilute pollinator abundance in agricultural landscapes across Europe. Ecol Lett. 2016; 19: 1228–1236. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12657 PMID: 27531385 75. Milinski L, Radisˇić D, Arok M, Nikolić T. Foraging habitat characteristics influence the nest- box occupancy and breeding parameters of European roller (Coracias garrulus) in Serbia. Arch Biol Sci. 2022; 74(3): 251–262. https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS220404024M 76. Cousins SAO, Eriksson O. After the hotspots are gone: Land use history and grassland plant species diversity in a strongly transformed agricultural landscape. Appl Veg Sci. 2008; 11: 365–374. https://doi. org/10.3170/2008-7-18480 77. Lindborg R, Eriksson O. Effects of restoration on plant species richness and composition in Scandina- vian seminatural grasslands. Restor Ecol 2004; 12: 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1061-2971. 2004.00334.x 78. Helm A, Hanski I, Pa¨rtel M. Slow response of plant species richness to habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecol Lett. 2006; 9: 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00841.x. PMID: 16958870 79. Butaye J, Adriaens D, Honnay O. (2005). Conservation and restoration of calcareous grasslands: a con- cise review of the effects of fragmentation and management on lantspecies. Biotechnol Agron Soc Envi-

Trang 19 · Đoạn 53Vị trí nguồn

ron. 2005; 9: 111–118. 80. Piqueray J, Mahy G. Revue bibliographique sur la restauration des pelouses calcicoles en Europe: con- traintes rencontre´es et solutions propose´es. Biotechnol Agron Soc Envir. 2010; 14: 471–484. 81. Rysiaka A, ChabuzbW, Sawicka-Zugaj W, Zdulskib J, Grzywaczewskic G, Kulik M. Comparative impacts of grazing and mowing on the floristics of grasslands in the buffer zone of Polesie National Park, eastern Poland. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2021; 27: Article e01612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco. 2021.e01612 82. Kapa´ s RE, Plue J, Kimberley A, Cousins SAO. Grazing livestock increases both vegetation and seed bank diversity in remnant and restored grasslands. J Veg Sci. 2020; 31; 1053–1065. https://doi.org/10. 1111/jvs.12956. 83. Littlewood NA, Stewart AJA, Woodcock BA. Science into practice: how can fundamental science con- tribute to better management of grasslands for invertebrates? Insect Conserv Divers. 2012; 5: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00174.x 84. Adriaens D, Honnay O, Hermy M. No evidence of a plant extinction debt in highly fragmented calcareous grasslands in Belgium. Biol Conserv. 2006; 133: 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.06.006 85. Honnay O, Coart E, Butaye J, Adriaens D, Van Glabeke S, Roldan-Ruiz I. Low impact of present and historical landscape configuration on the genetics of fragmented Anthyllis vulneraria populations. Biol Conserv. 2006; 127: 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.006 86. Rupprecht D, Gilhaus K, Ho¨lzel N. Effects of year-round grazing on the vegetation of nutrient-poor

Trang 19 · Đoạn 54Vị trí nguồn

grassand heathlands—Evidence from a large-scale survey. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2016; 234: 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.02.015 PLOS ONE Effects of habitat management on biodiversity PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301391 March 28, 2024 19 / 19