Constraints, mechanisms, and strategies for industry-education integration in vocational education: An empirical study

PLOS One | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0339158 December 18, 2025 18 / 18 35. Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Opinions of the General Office of the CPC Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council on deepening reforms and innovation and expanding openness through the comprehensive reform pilot in Shenzhen. 2024. Available from: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202506/content_7027178.htm 36. Chen X, Xue S, Yang T, Yang Q. Research on influencing factors of line loss rate of regional distribution network based on apriori-interpretative structural model. Energy Reports. 2022;8:53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.048 37. Santana WB, Pereira LM, Freires FGM, Maues LMF. Analysis of the barriers to the adoption of green buildings labels in Brazil by the validated interpretative structural modeling (VISM) technique. J Clean Prod. 2023;414:137642. 38. Yu B, Wang J, Li R, Wang Q, Wu H, Xu X, et al. Unveiling the NIMBY effect in construction and demolition waste landfilling: Factors, paths, and solutions. J Environ Manage. 2024;366:121925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121925 PMID: 39029167 39. Liu Y, Houwing EJ, Hertogh M, Bakker H. Project-based learning principles: Insights from the development of large infrastructure. Front Eng Manag. 2024;11(3):501–15. 40. Liu H, Zhou Y, Tan Y, Xiong L, Mao P. A novel dynamic model for evaluating metro microenvironmental health vulnerability based on deep learning. Comput Ind Eng. 2025;205:111162.

41. Wang Y, Yu Y, Xu T, Wang Z, Fang Y. Interpretative structural modeling method: An analysis of influencing factors analysis on the adverse expe- riences of cardiac surgery patients in the intensive care units. Heliyon. 2024;10(17):e36511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36511 PMID: 39281500 42. Kang Y, Liu R, Yang B. Bridging the ivory tower and industry: How do university science parks promote university-industry collaboration? Res Pol- icy. 2025;54(6):105241. 43. Li X, Tan J. Exploring the role of university-run enterprises in technology transfer from Chinese universities. Manage Organ Rev. 2020;16:907–43. 44. Cai Y. Towards a new model of EU-China innovation cooperation: Bridging missing links between international university collaboration and interna- tional industry collaboration. Technovation. 2023;119:102553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102553 45. Woerter M. Technology proximity between firms and universities and technology transfer. J Technol Transf. 2011;37(6):828–66. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10961-011-9207-x 46. Evans N, Miklosik A, Du JT. University-industry collaboration as a driver of digital transformation: Types, benefits and enablers. Heliyon. 2023;9(10):e21017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21017 PMID: 37867890 47. Bstieler L, Hemmert M, Barczak G. The changing bases of mutual trust formation in inter-organizational relationships: A dyadic study of university- industry research collaborations. J Bus Res. 2017;74:47–54.

48. Chai S, Shih W. Bridging science and technology through academic–industry partnerships. Res Policy. 2016;45(1):148–58. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.007 49. Nsanzumuhire SU, Groot W. Context perspective on university-industry collaboration processes: A systematic review of literature. J Clean Prod. 2020;258:120861. 50. Zaharia N. University-Industry Knowledge Transfer: Channels of Sport Research Interaction. Int J Biometrics. 2017;12(9):1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ ijbm.v12n9p1 51. Sumrit D, Jongprasittiphol O. Exploring barriers in supply chain disaster management using fuzzy total interpretative structure modeling approach: Insight from Thai automotive industry. Asia Pacific Management Review. 2024;29(1):84–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2023.06.001 52. Wang H, Li J, Mao P. Identifying factors influencing energy saving cognition-behavior gaps in shared residential spaces using interpretable machine learning: A dormitory case study. J Build Eng. 2025;100:111809. 53. Zaidi SAH, Shahbaz M, Hou F, Abbas Q. Sustainability challenges in public health sector procurement: An application of interpretative structural modelling. Socio-Econ Plan Sci. 2021;77:101028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101028 54. Li G, Wu X, Han J-C, Li B, Huang Y, Wang Y. Flood risk assessment by using an interpretative structural modeling based Bayesian net- work approach (ISM-BN): An urban-level analysis of Shenzhen, China. J Environ Manage. 2023;329:117040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen- vman.2022.117040 PMID: 36535147

55. Payandeh R, Delbari A, Fardad F, Helmzadeh J, Shafiee S, Ghatari AR. Unraveling the potential of blockchain technology in enhancing sup- ply chain traceability: A systematic literature review and modeling with ISM. Blockchain Res Appl. 2025;6(1):100240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. bcra.2024.100240 56. Sinaga R, Prastowo, Simangunsong BCH, Liebman A, Tambunan AH. Analysis of barriers in supplying electricity using interpretative structural modeling. Energy Strat Rev. 2019;25:11–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.04.011