Constraints, mechanisms, and strategies for industry-education integration in vocational education: An empirical study

PLOS One | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0339158 December 18, 2025 15 / 18 4.3. Enterprise: Proactively assuming educational responsibilities The findings also suggest that weak enterprise willingness to collaborate is a direct constraint, primarily due to unmet expectations regarding benefits. Thus, enterprises should move beyond a purely profit-driven mindset, recognize the long-term value of IEI, and actively contribute to educational development by fostering a corporate culture conducive to deeper collaboration. First, enterprises should engage in collaborative talent development, such as co-establishing modern industrial colleges with vocational institutions to cultivate high-quality applied talent. To address cost concerns that may hinder enterprise participation, a clear cost-sharing framework could be adopted: enterprises may primarily invest in industry-relevant equipment, on-site training venues, and part-time enterprise instructors, while vocational institutions take charge of curriculum design, full-time faculty allocation, and daily operation management. This division balances resource input and aligns with each party’s core strengths. Additionally, enterprises should leverage policy incentive support—such as applying for government subsidies for industry-education integration projects or tax deductions for educational invest- ments—to offset partial costs, thereby enhancing the economic feasibility of joint modern industrial college establishment.

They should also provide in-service training and continuous education to ensure employees’ skills remain aligned with industry advancements. Second, enterprises should contribute educational resources, such as instructors, equipment, and training bases, to enhance students’ practical skills while improving resource utilization efficiency. Third, enterprises should encourage employees to participate in vocational institution teaching and student mentoring, strengthening corpo- rate social responsibility while enhancing employees’ professional and leadership competencies. 5. Conclusions IEI is a critical strategic measure for advancing vocational education development. However, with the acceleration of industrial upgrading and technological transformation, the mismatch between traditional talent cultivation models and mar- ket demands has become increasingly prominent, necessitating an in-depth clarification of the constraints hindering IEI in vocational education. Therefore, this study takes Shenzhen, China, as an empirical case to systematically explore the constraints, mechanisms, and strategies for IEI in vocational education. The findings reveal 12 constraining factors, cat- egorized into five hierarchical levels, forming 16 constraining pathways. Specifically, imperfect policies and weak prelimi- nary industry-education collaboration are identified as deep-rooted factors. These influence intermediate factors such as institutional commitment and communication effectiveness, ultimately manifesting as surface-level issues, including insuffi-

cient corporate engagement and ambiguous rights-responsibility allocation between stakeholders. Notably, corporate will- ingness to participate is affected by nine distinct pathways, emerging as the core bottleneck impeding IEI implementation. In summary, this study’s primary contribution lies in its empirical identification of a multi-level constraint system for IEI, with corporate participation as the central barrier. A key innovation is the precise revelation of 16 influencing pathways, which systematically uncovers the underlying mechanisms—from policy and foundational collaboration to intermediate linkages and final outcomes—thereby providing a comprehensive theoretical basis for formulating targeted promotion strategies. To effectively promote IEI in vocational education, collaborative efforts from the government, vocational institutions, and enterprises are essential. The government should strengthen institutional safeguards, vocational institutions must consoli- date the foundation for industry collaboration, and enterprises ought to actively fulfill their educational responsibilities. However, this study has limitations. It focuses exclusively on Shenzhen, China, a global manufacturing hub and national educational reform pilot with unique industrial agglomeration, such as high-tech and advanced manufacturing, and policy support, which may restrict the generalizability of findings to regions with different economic structures or institutional environments. Additionally, it neglects sectoral variations in IEI: manufacturing, including electronics and

automotive parts, relies on formalized, equipment-intensive IEI models, such as long-term internships, while construction prioritizes project-based, flexible collaborations, leading to heterogeneous impacts of identified constraints. For exam- ple, policy clarity is more critical for manufacturing, while communication effectiveness is more important for construc- tion. Future research can address these limitations by: 1) expanding to cross-regional or cross-country comparisons, for