Thông tin tài nguyên

Pre-service teachers’ empathy and attitudes toward inclusive education—The chain mediating role of teaching motivation and inclusive education efficacy

pmc-PMC12040106.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 18 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 16 · Đoạn 41Vị trí nguồn

PLOS One | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321066 April 29, 2025 16 / 18 References 1. UNESCO. Guidelines for inclusion: Ensuring education for all. 2006 [2024-04-08]. Available from: http//www.ibe.unesco.org/sites/default/files/ Guidelines_for_Inclusion_UNESCO_pdf 2. Chen L, Zhao W, Wei XJ. The relationship between proactive personality and apprehension in inclusive education among kindergarten students: The mediating role of efficacy and attitude in inclusive education. Chinese Special Education. 2020;10:64–70. 3. de Boer A, Pijl SJ, Minnaert A. Regular primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: a review of the literature. International Jour- nal of Inclusive Education. 2011;15(3):331–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903030089 4. Sharma U, Nuttal A. The impact of training on pre-service teacher attitudes, concerns, and efficacy towards inclusion. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. 2016;44(2):142–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866x.2015.1081672 5. Wang Y, Huang LL, Wang Y, Zhang LL. An analysis and outlook of the research on inclusive education literacy of teachers in classrooms in China. Teacher Education Research. 2018;01(01):26–32. https://doi.org/10.13445/j.cnki.t.e.r.2018.01.005 6. Lim SM-Y, Wong ME, Tan D. Allied educators (learning and behavioural support) in Singapore’s mainstream schools: first steps towards inclusivity? International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2014;18(2):123–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2012.758321

Trang 16 · Đoạn 42Vị trí nguồn

7. He H. A study of pre-service teachers’ exoteric and implicit attitudes towards children with autism (Master’s thesis, Northwest Normal University). 2022. Available from: https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD202301&filename=1022616885.nh 8. Messiou K, Ainscow M, Echeita G, Goldrick S, Hope M, Paes I, et al. Learning from differences: a strategy for teacher development in respect to student diversity. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 2016;27(1):45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.966726 9. Zhu N, Lei JH. Research on the cultivation of special education competence of free teacher trainees in the context of inclusive education. China Special Education. 2014;02(02):29–35. 10. Song T, . A systematic literature review of empirical research on pre-service teacher training (2015-2019). Journal of East China Normal University (Education Science Edition). 2020;09(09):78–102. https://doi.org/10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.09.005 11. Mehrabian A, Russell JA. An approach to environmental psychology. The MIT Press; 1974. 12. Cai Y, Yang Y, Ge Q, Weng H. The interplay between teacher empathy, students’ sense of school belonging, and learning achievement. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2023;38(3):1167–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00637-6 13. Teding van Berkhout E, Malouff JM. The efficacy of empathy training: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Couns Psychol. 2016;63(1):32–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000093 PMID: 26191979

Trang 16 · Đoạn 43Vị trí nguồn

14. Jin G, Zhang Y. A study of the effects of work motivation and organisational climate on nurses’ empathy. Nursing Research. 2015;19:2333–7. 15. Decety J, Cowell JM. Empathy, justice, and moral behavior. AJOB Neurosci. 2015;6(3):3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2015.1047055 PMID: 26877887 16. Andreychik MR, Migliaccio N. Empathizing With Others’ Pain Versus Empathizing With Others’ Joy: Examining the Separability of Positive and Negative Empathy and Their Relation to Different Types of Social Behaviors and Social Emotions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 2015;37(5):274–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2015.1071256 17. Devine PG, Forscher PS, Austin AJ, Cox WTL. Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. J Exp Soc Psy- chol. 2012;48(6):1267–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.003 PMID: 23524616 18. Stojiljković S, Djigić G, Zlatković B. Empathy and Teachers’ Roles. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012;69:960–6. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.021 19. Holper L, Goldin AP, Shalóm DE, Battro AM, Wolf M, Sigman M. The teaching and the learning brain: A cortical hemodynamic marker of teacher– student interactions in the Socratic dialog. International Journal of Educational Research. 2013;59:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.002 20. Goroshit M, Hen M. Teachers’ empathy: can it be predicted by self-efficacy?. Teachers and Teaching. 2016;22(7):805–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 3540602.2016.1185818

Trang 16 · Đoạn 44Vị trí nguồn

21. Ronen IK. Empathy Awareness Among Pre-service Teachers: the Case of the Incorrect Use of the Intuitive Rule “Same A–Same B”. Int J of Sci and Math Educ. 2020;18(1):183–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09952-9 22. Wink MN, LaRusso MD, Smith RL. Teacher empathy and students with problem behaviors: Examining teachers’ perceptions, responses, relation- ships, and burnout. Psychology in the Schools. 2021;58(8):1575–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22516 23. Parchomiuk M. Teacher Empathy and Attitudes Towards Individuals with Disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Educa- tion. 2018;66(1):56–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912x.2018.1460654 24. Vadillo RC. Should we move from special education to inclusive education? Perspectives and possibilities of advance. Alteridad. 2018;13(1):251–61. 25. Makoelle TM. Teacher empathy: A prerequisite for an inclusive classroom. Encyclopedia of Teacher Education. 2019;11(2):27–39. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-981-13-1179-643-1 26. Jaber LZ, Southerland S, Dake F. Cultivating epistemic empathy in preservice teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2018;72:13– 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.02.009

Trang 17 · Đoạn 45Vị trí nguồn

PLOS One | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321066 April 29, 2025 17 / 18 27. Gonzalez KA, Riggle EDB, Rostosky SS. Cultivating positive feelings and attitudes: A path to prejudice reduction and ally behavior. Translational Issues in Psychological Science. 2015;1(4):372–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000049 28. Mirete AB, Belmonte ML, Mirete L, García-Sanz MP. Predictors of attitudes about people with intellectual disabilities: empathy for a change towards inclusion. Int J Dev Disabil. 2020;68(5):615–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2020.1851122 PMID: 36210903 29. Ge Y, Li W, Chen F, Kayani S, Qin G. The Theories of the Development of Students: A Factor to Shape Teacher Empathy From the Perspective of Motivation. Front Psychol. 2021;12:736656. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736656 PMID: 34867618 30. Huang F. The relationship between trait mindfulness and inclusive education attitudes of primary school teachers: a multiple mediating model. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1280352. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1280352 PMID: 38173854 31. Suo CQ, Liu XT, Wang Y. The relationship between rural early childhood teachers’ motivation to teach and their long-term willingness to teach: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Research on Education and Teaching. 2022;1(01):74–83. https://doi.org/10.13627/j.cnki.cdjy.20220124.005 32. Heinz M. Why choose teaching? An international review of empirical studies exploring student teachers’ career motivations and levels of commit-

Trang 17 · Đoạn 46Vị trí nguồn

ment to teaching. Educational Research and Evaluation. 2015;21(3):258–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2015.1018278 33. Mao M. Influence of gender and empathy of respondents on their competence ratings (Master’s thesis, Harbin Engineering). 2017. Available from: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v 34. Nwosu KC, Wahl WP, Cassim H, Anierobi EI, Akuneme CC, Okwuduba EN. Teacher self-concept and its association with willingness to include children with special needs in regular classes: Teacher empathy as a mediator. Learning. 2021. Available from: https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/4.0/ 35. Cao ZP, Jin XL, Wang XY. A study on the relationship between freshmen students’ motivation to learn chemistry and their awareness and attitude towards laboratory safety. Chemistry Education (In English and Chinese). 2022;08:111–7. 36. Li Y. A study of early childhood teachers’ self-efficacy in implementing inclusive education (Master’s thesis, Northwest Normal University). 2018. Available from: https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201901&filename=1018161451.nh 37. Goleman D, Intelligence E. Why it can matter more than IQ. Emotional Intelligence. 1995. 38. Morales Rodríguez FM, Rodríguez Clares R, García Muñoz MR. Influence of Resilience, Everyday Stress, Self-Efficacy, Self-Esteem, Emotional Intelligence, and Empathy on Attitudes toward Sexual and Gender Diversity Rights. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(17):6219. https://doi. org/10.3390/ijerph17176219 PMID: 32867132

Trang 17 · Đoạn 47Vị trí nguồn

39. Carmen R-G, Olga B-G, Beatriz M. Socio-Emotional Competence and Self-Efficacy of Future Secondary School Teachers. Education Sciences. 2022;12(3):161. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030161 40. Yong FL, Kong M, Ee YS. Influence of self-efficacy, empathy and self-esteem on teachers’ attitudes toward students with autism spectrum disorder. Innovations. 2023;72:110–32. 41. Çelikkaleli Ö, Ökmen AŞ. The Role of Empathic Tendency, Belief in Teaching Competency and Job Satisfaction in Predicting Attitudes towards the Teaching Profession in Primary and Secondary School Teachers. EDUPIJ. 2021;10(4):92–121. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2021.104.6 42. Zhang YM. General teachers’ perceived efficacy in implementing inclusive education and its relationship with attitudes toward inclusive education (Master’s thesis, Shenyang Normal University). 2019. 43. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press; 2013. 44. Gök B, Atalay Kabasakal K. Analysing prospective teachers’ self-efficacy belief, teaching motivation and attitudes towards teaching from the per- spective of several variables = Ögretmen adaylarinin ögretmen öz yeterlik inanci, ögretme motivasyonu ve ögretmenlik meslegine yönelik tutumlari- nin çesitli degiskenler açisindan incelenmesi. Pegegog. 2019;9(4):1081–112. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2019.035 45. Bas G. Effect of student teachers’ teaching beliefs and attitudes towards teaching on motivation to teach: mediating role of self-efficacy. Journal of

Trang 17 · Đoạn 48Vị trí nguồn

Education for Teaching. 2021;48(3):348–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.2006043 46. Davis MH. A social psychological approach. Westview Press, Madison, WI; 1996. 47. Schepens A, Aelterman A, Vlerick P. Student teachers’ professional identity formation: between being born as a teacher and becoming one. Educa- tional Studies. 2009;35(4):361–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690802648317 48. Sharma U, Loreman T, Forlin C. Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Research in Spec Educ Needs. 2011;12(1):12–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01200.x 49. Forlin C, Earle C, Loreman T, Sharma U. The Sentiments, Attitudes, and Concerns about Inclusive Education Revised (SACIE-R) Scale for Mea- suring Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions about Inclusion. EEI. 2011;21(3). https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v21i3.7682 50. Brislin RW. Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In: Triandis, H.C., Lambert, W.W. (Eds.), Handbook of Cross-cultural Psy- chology. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, 1980. pp. 349–444. 51. Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. EBR. 2019;31(1):2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ ebr-11-2018-0203 52. Ngah AH, Zainuddin Y, Thurasamy R. Barriers and enablers in adopting of Halal warehousing. Journal of Islamic Marketing. 2015;6(3):354–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/jima-03-2014-0027

Trang 18 · Đoạn 49Vị trí nguồn

PLOS One | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321066 April 29, 2025 18 / 18 53. Xiong HX, Zhang J, Zheng X. Do methods influence results? The nature, effects, and control of method variance. Psychological Inquiry. 2013;3(3):195–9. 54. Simmering MJ, Fuller CM, Richardson HA, Ocal Y, Atinc GM. Marker Variable Choice, Reporting, and Interpretation in the Detection of Common Method Variance: A review and demonstration. Organizational Research Methods. 2014;18(3):473–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114560023 55. Kock N. Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM. International Journal of e-Collaboration. 2015;11(4):1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101 56. Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA. Formative Versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illus- tration. British J of Management. 2006;17(4):263–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x 57. Franke G, Sarstedt M. Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures. INTR. 2019;29(3):430–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-12-2017-0515 58. Chin WW. Issues and opinions on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly. 1998;22(1):7–16. 59. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587 60. Shmueli G, Sarstedt M, Hair JF, Cheah J-H, Ting H, Vaithilingam S, et al. Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpre- dict. EJM. 2019;53(11):2322–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-02-2019-0189

Trang 18 · Đoạn 50Vị trí nguồn

61. Danks NP, Ray S. Predictions from Partial Least Squares Models. In: Applying Partial Least Squares in Tourism and Hospitality Research. Emerald Publishing Limited; 2018. p. 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-699-620181003 62. Navarro-Mateu D, Franco-Ochoa J, Valero-Moreno S, Prado-Gascó V. To be or not to be an inclusive teacher: Are empathy and social dominance relevant factors to positive attitudes towards inclusive education? PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0225993. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225993 PMID: 31821354 63. Wang XS, Wang XW, Ren YC. Characteristics and relationship analysis of empathy, social responsibility and attitude toward inclusive education among teacher trainees majoring in elementary education. Modern Special Education. 2022;08(08):70–6. 64. Messineo L, Seta L, Allegra M. The relationship between empathy and altruistic motivations in nursing studies: a multi-method study. BMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00620-4 PMID: 34233674 65. Wang XM, Xiao AX, Ye JR, Wang HY, Wu CX. A study of psychiatric nurses’ level of empathy, discriminatory attitudes towards patients with mental illness and correlations. Evidence-Based Nursing. 2023;21:3898–901. 66. Segal EA. Social Empathy: A Model Built on Empathy, Contextual Understanding, and Social Responsibility That Promotes Social Justice. Journal of Social Service Research. 2011;37(3):266–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2011.564040

Trang 18 · Đoạn 51Vị trí nguồn

67. Li H, Chen W, He H, Luo W. Chinese Private Preschool Teachers’ Teaching Readiness and Teacher-Child Relationships: The Chain Mediation Effects of Motivation to Teach and Self-Efficacy. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023;13(11):900. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110900 PMID: 37998647 68. Hellmich F, Löper MF, Görel G. The role of primary school teachers’ attitudes and self‐efficacy beliefs for everyday practices in inclusive class- rooms – a study on the verification of the ‘Theory of Planned Behaviour’. Research in Spec Educ Needs. 2019;19(S1):36–48. https://doi. org/10.1111/1471-3802.12476 69. Chan S, Maneewan S, Koul R. An examination of the relationship between the perceived instructional behaviours of teacher educators and pre-service teachers’ learning motivation and teaching self-efficacy. Educational Review. 2021;75(2):264–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.202 1.1916440 70. Park M, Dimitrov DM, Das A, Gichuru M. The teacher efficacy for inclusive practices (TEIP) scale: dimensionality and factor structure. Research in Spec Educ Needs. 2014;16(1):2–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12047