Pre-service teachers’ empathy and attitudes toward inclusive education—The chain mediating role of teaching motivation and inclusive education efficacy

PLOS One | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321066 April 29, 2025 18 / 18 53. Xiong HX, Zhang J, Zheng X. Do methods influence results? The nature, effects, and control of method variance. Psychological Inquiry. 2013;3(3):195–9. 54. Simmering MJ, Fuller CM, Richardson HA, Ocal Y, Atinc GM. Marker Variable Choice, Reporting, and Interpretation in the Detection of Common Method Variance: A review and demonstration. Organizational Research Methods. 2014;18(3):473–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114560023 55. Kock N. Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM. International Journal of e-Collaboration. 2015;11(4):1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101 56. Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA. Formative Versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illus- tration. British J of Management. 2006;17(4):263–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x 57. Franke G, Sarstedt M. Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures. INTR. 2019;29(3):430–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-12-2017-0515 58. Chin WW. Issues and opinions on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly. 1998;22(1):7–16. 59. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587 60. Shmueli G, Sarstedt M, Hair JF, Cheah J-H, Ting H, Vaithilingam S, et al. Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpre- dict. EJM. 2019;53(11):2322–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-02-2019-0189

61. Danks NP, Ray S. Predictions from Partial Least Squares Models. In: Applying Partial Least Squares in Tourism and Hospitality Research. Emerald Publishing Limited; 2018. p. 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-699-620181003 62. Navarro-Mateu D, Franco-Ochoa J, Valero-Moreno S, Prado-Gascó V. To be or not to be an inclusive teacher: Are empathy and social dominance relevant factors to positive attitudes towards inclusive education? PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0225993. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225993 PMID: 31821354 63. Wang XS, Wang XW, Ren YC. Characteristics and relationship analysis of empathy, social responsibility and attitude toward inclusive education among teacher trainees majoring in elementary education. Modern Special Education. 2022;08(08):70–6. 64. Messineo L, Seta L, Allegra M. The relationship between empathy and altruistic motivations in nursing studies: a multi-method study. BMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00620-4 PMID: 34233674 65. Wang XM, Xiao AX, Ye JR, Wang HY, Wu CX. A study of psychiatric nurses’ level of empathy, discriminatory attitudes towards patients with mental illness and correlations. Evidence-Based Nursing. 2023;21:3898–901. 66. Segal EA. Social Empathy: A Model Built on Empathy, Contextual Understanding, and Social Responsibility That Promotes Social Justice. Journal of Social Service Research. 2011;37(3):266–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2011.564040

67. Li H, Chen W, He H, Luo W. Chinese Private Preschool Teachers’ Teaching Readiness and Teacher-Child Relationships: The Chain Mediation Effects of Motivation to Teach and Self-Efficacy. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023;13(11):900. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110900 PMID: 37998647 68. Hellmich F, Löper MF, Görel G. The role of primary school teachers’ attitudes and self‐efficacy beliefs for everyday practices in inclusive class- rooms – a study on the verification of the ‘Theory of Planned Behaviour’. Research in Spec Educ Needs. 2019;19(S1):36–48. https://doi. org/10.1111/1471-3802.12476 69. Chan S, Maneewan S, Koul R. An examination of the relationship between the perceived instructional behaviours of teacher educators and pre-service teachers’ learning motivation and teaching self-efficacy. Educational Review. 2021;75(2):264–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.202 1.1916440 70. Park M, Dimitrov DM, Das A, Gichuru M. The teacher efficacy for inclusive practices (TEIP) scale: dimensionality and factor structure. Research in Spec Educ Needs. 2014;16(1):2–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12047