Are climate change perceptions related with plastic policy support? Effects of climate change skepticism, guilt, and efficacy on the acceptance of the plastic tax

PLOS One | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337327 December 29, 2025 28 / 30 57. Mozumder P, Vásquez WF, Marathe A. Consumers’ preference for renewable energy in the southwest USA. Energy Econ. 2011;33(6):1119–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.08.003 58. Kim S, Kim K. Beyond risk and benefit: heuristic effect of experienced affect on acceptance of nuclear power stations. IRPA. 2007;41(3):373–98. 59. Schwartz SH. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 1992;25:1–65. 60. Stern PC, Dietz T. The value basis of environmental concern. J Soc Issues. 1994;50(3):65–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x 61. Jang H-W, Cho M. Relationship between personal values and intentions to purchase plant-based meat alternatives: application of the dual concern theory. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(14):8673. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148673 PMID: 35886523 62. Douglas M, Wildavsky A. Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Univ of California Press; 1983. 63. Douglas M. Natural symbols. Routledge; 2002. 64. Inglehart R. The silent revolution in Europe: intergenerational change in post-industrial societies. Am Polit Sci Rev. 1971;65(4):991–1017. https:// doi.org/10.2307/1953494 65. Kim SKS. Analyzing the universality and particularity of determinant structure of environmentalism: comparative study of 32 countries and policy implication. Korea Policy Study Rev. 2014;23(4):335–71.

66. M K. An empirical study on the influential factors and political effects of materialism and postmaterialism. Korean J Local Gov Adm Stud. 2008;22(1):65–82. 67. Gelissen J. Explaining popular support for environmental protection: a multilevel analysis of 50 nations. Environ Behav. 2007;39(3):392–415. 68. Hurst M, Dittmar H, Bond R, Kasser T. The relationship between materialistic values and environmental attitudes and behaviors: a meta-analysis. J Environ Psychol. 2013;36:257–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.09.003 69. Ku L, Zaroff C. How far is your money from your mouth? The effects of intrinsic relative to extrinsic values on willingness to pay and protect the environment. J Environ Psychol. 2014;40:472–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.10.008 70. Kilbourne W, Pickett G. How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concern, and environmentally responsible behavior. J Bus Res. 2008;61(9):885–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.09.016 71. Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Perceived risk: psychological factors and social implications. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci. 1981;376(1764):17–34. 72. Visschers VHM, Siegrist M. How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster. Risk Anal. 2013;33(2):333–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01861.x PMID: 22762151 73. Park E, Ohm JY. Factors influencing the public intention to use renewable energy technologies in South Korea: effects of the Fukushima nuclear

accident. Energy Policy. 2014;65:198–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.037 74. Kim S, Kim S. Analyzing the determinants of concern about and responses to climate change. Kor J Pub Ad. 2016;54:179–206. 75. Park C-h, Kim S-y. The role of knowledge in acceptance of nuclear power: a focus on objective and subjective knowledge. KJPA. 2015;53(3):117–50. 76. Langer K, Wooliscroft B. The acceptance of wind energy in a leading country and low deployment country of wind energy: a cross-national compar- ative analysis. Renew Energy Focus. 2018;27:111–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2018.09.003 77. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J. Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res. 2002;8(3):239–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401 78. Gifford R, Nilsson A. Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: a review. Int J Psychol. 2014;49(3):141– 57. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034 PMID: 24821503 79. Earle TC, Siegrist M, Gutscher H. Trust in risk management: uncertainty and scepticism in the public mind. Earthscan; 2010. 80. Siegrist M. The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Anal. 2000;20(2):195–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.202020 PMID: 10859780 81. Jungermann H, Pfister H, Fischer K. Credibility, information preferences, and information interests. Risk Anal. 1996;16(2):251–61. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01455.x

82. Kim S, Sunhee K. Analyzing the moderation effect of local residents’ perceived benefit on the acceptance of nuclear power energy. Public Policy Rev. 2017;31(4):215–42. https://doi.org/10.17327/IPPA.2017.31.4.008 83. Slovic P, Flynn JH, Layman M. Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste. Science. 1991;254(5038):1603–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.254.5038.1603 PMID: 17782210 84. Huijts NMA, Molin EJE, Steg L. Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: a review-based comprehensive framework. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16(1):525–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.018 85. Lim CK, Kim S. The study on negative effect of nuclear corruption scandal and the mechanism of trust. Korea Public Admin J. 2014;23(3):131–59. 86. Lomborg B. The skeptical environmentalist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.