Are climate change perceptions related with plastic policy support? Effects of climate change skepticism, guilt, and efficacy on the acceptance of the plastic tax

PLOS One | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337327 December 29, 2025 26 / 30 Methodology: Sehyeok Jeon. Visualization: Sehyeok Jeon. References 1. Department SR. Global plastics production from 1950 to 2021: Statista; 2023. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/282732/ global-production-of-plastics-since-1950/ 2. Plastics B. The new coal: plastics and climate change. Beyond Plastics at Bennington College; 2021. 3. IUCN. Marine plastics: International Union for Conservation of Nature; 2023. Available from: https://www.iucn.org/resources/issues-briefs/ marine-plastics 4. Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci Adv. 2017;3(7):e1700782. https://doi.org/10.1126/ sciadv.1700782 PMID: 28776036 5. Jambeck JR, Geyer R, Wilcox C, Siegler TR, Perryman M, Andrady A, et al. Marine pollution. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Sci- ence. 2015;347(6223):768–71. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260352 PMID: 25678662 6. Lau WWY, Shiran Y, Bailey RM, Cook E, Stuchtey MR, Koskella J, et al. Evaluating scenarios toward zero plastic pollution. Science. 2020;369(6510):1455–61. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba9475 PMID: 32703909 7. Forum WE. The new plastics economy: rethinking the future of plastics. 2016. 8. Law CfIE. Plastic & climate: the hidden costs of a plastic planet. Washington (DC); 2019. 9. Union E. Council Decision (EU) 2019/665 of 15 April 2019 amending Decision 2014/335/EU on the system of own resources of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union; 2019.

10. Rivers N, Shenstone-Harris S, Young N. Using nudges to reduce waste? The case of Toronto’s plastic bag levy. J Environ Manage. 2017;188:153– 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.009 PMID: 27978442 11. Homonoff T, Kao LS, Selman J, Seybolt C. The intended and unintended consequences of disposable bag regulation. 2021. 12. Taylor RL, Villas‐Boas SB. Bans vs. fees: disposable carryout bag policies and bag usage. Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2015;38(2):351–72. https:// doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppv025 13. Fischbach E, Sparks E, Hudson K, Lio S, Englebretson E. Consumer concern and willingness to pay for plastic alternatives in food service. Sus- tainability. 2022;14(10):5992. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105992 14. Stern PC. New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues. 2000;56(3):407–24. https:// doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175 15. Fairbrother M. Public opinion about climate policies: a review and call for more studies of what people want. PLOS Clim. 2022;1(5):e0000030. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000030 16. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211. 17. Hornsey MJ, Harris EA, Bain PG, Fielding KS. Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nat Clim Change. 2016;6(6):622–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2943 18. Bissing-Olson MJ, Fielding KS, Iyer A. Experiences of pride, not guilt, predict pro-environmental behavior when pro-environmental descriptive

norms are more positive. J Environ Psychol. 2016;45:145–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.01.001 19. van der Linden S, Maibach E, Leiserowitz A. Improving public engagement with climate change: five “best practice” insights from psychological science. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10(6):758–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615598516 PMID: 26581732 20. Drews S, van den Bergh JCJM. What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Clim Policy. 2015;16(7):855–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240 21. Zheng J, Suh S. Strategies to reduce the global carbon footprint of plastics. Nat Clim Chang. 2019;9(5):374–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41558-019-0459-z 22. Nielsen KS, Clayton S, Stern PC, Dietz T, Capstick S, Whitmarsh L. How psychology can help limit climate change. Am Psychol. 2021;76(1):130– 44. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000624 PMID: 32202817 23. Bamberg S, Möser G. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. J Environ Psychol. 2007;27(1):14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002 24. Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M, Slovic P, Ouellette LL, Braman D, et al. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived cli- mate change risks. Nat Clim Change. 2012;2(10):732–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1547 25. Rogers RW. A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change1. J Psychol. 1975;91(1):93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980. 1975.9915803 PMID: 28136248

26. Klöckner CA. A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—A meta-analysis. Glob Environ Change. 2013;23(5):1028– 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014