How can climate adaptation policy enhance urban climate resilience? Empirical evidence from China

PLOS One | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335736 November 6, 2025 20 / 21 30. Zhang D, Mohsin M, Taghizadeh-Hesary F. Does green finance counteract the climate change mitigation: Asymmetric effect of renewable energy investment and R&D. Energy Economics. 2022;113:106183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106183 31. Hepburn C, Qi Y, Stern N, Ward B, Xie C, Zenghelis D. Towards carbon neutrality and China’s 14th Five-Year Plan: Clean energy transition, sus- tainable urban development, and investment priorities. Environ Sci Ecotechnol. 2021;8:100130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2021.100130 PMID: 36156997 32. Online high-band grid impedance measurement using variable frequency carrier based PWM scheme. CSEE JPES. 2020. https://doi.org/10.17775/ cseejpes.2019.02520 33. Li Z-Z, Li RYM, Malik MY, Murshed M, Khan Z, Umar M. Determinants of Carbon Emission in China: How Good is Green Investment?. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2021;27:392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.008 34. Wu YT, Zhang Y, Ni DH. Can green finance achieve a win-win situation for urban ecological and economic benefits: Dual perspective based on environmental regulation and capital allocation. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics. 2024;26(5):46–59. https://doi. org/10.16538/j.cnki.jsufe.2024.05.004 35. Whitmarsh L, Poortinga W, Capstick S. Behaviour change to address climate change. Curr Opin Psychol. 2021;42:76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. copsyc.2021.04.002 PMID: 33991862

36. Michelsen G, Fischer D. Sustainable development policy: A European perspective. London: Routledge; 2017. 37. van de Wetering J, Leijten P, Spitzer J, Thomaes S. Does environmental education benefit environmental outcomes in children and adolescents? A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2022;81:101782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101782 38. Otto S, Pensini P. Nature-based environmental education of children: Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behaviour. Global Environmental Change. 2017;47:88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.09.009 39. Bridoux F, Stoelhorst JW. Stakeholder governance. Solving the collective action problems in joint value creation. Academy of Management Review. 2022; 47(2):214–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0441 40. Guo Z, Chen X, Zhang Y. Impact of environmental regulation perception on farmers’ agricultural green production technology adoption: A new perspective of social capital. Technology in Society. 2022;71:102085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102085 41. Xie C, Wang R, Gong X. The influence of environmental cognition on green consumption behavior. Front Psychol. 2022;13:988585. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988585 PMID: 36237699 42. Ma L, Liu S, Zheng MN. Enterprise digital transformation, green innovation, and carbon performance: The regulating role of carbon emission trad- ing policies and public environmental awareness. R&D Management. 2024;36(2):63–73.

43. Xu JH, Ye FS, Shang LX. Research on the impact of public environmental attention on corporate carbon performance level. Chinese Journal of Management. 2024;21(6):865–75. 44. He X, Mou D. Impacts of mineral resources: Evidence from county economies in China. Energy Policy. 2020;136:111088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. enpol.2019.111088 45. Zhang RJ, Fu L, Sun XH. Geographical location, economic location, and industrial transformation of resource-based cities. Macroeconomics. 2022;7:88–104. 46. Cheng Z, Li X, Wang M. Resource curse and green economic growth. Resources Policy. 2021;74:102325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. resourpol.2021.102325 47. Wang P, Wang QC, Han RR, Tang LB, Liu X, Cai WJ. A review of global key metal low-carbon energy correlation research and its implications. Resources Science. 2021;43(4):669–81. 48. Xue JC. Study on spatio-temporal characteristics of coupling and coordination of water and land. Resources utilization efficiency in the urban of Yellow River Basin. Ecological Economy. 2024;40(3):160–9. 49. Wu ZY, Sun S, Zhang SY, Wang W. Research on climate resilience assessment and improvement strategies for cities in the Yellow River Basin. Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Resources. 2024;41(2):62–74. 50. Arkhangelsky D, Athey S, Hirshberg D, Imbens G, Wager S. Synthetic Difference In Differences. National Bureau of Economic Research. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25532 51. Wen Z, Fang J, Xie J, Ouyang J. Methodological research on mediation effects in China’s mainland. Advances in Psychological Science.

2022;30(8):1692. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1042.2022.01692 52. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical consider- ations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–82. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 PMID: 3806354 53. Xu A, Wang W, Zhu Y. Does smart city pilot policy reduce CO2 emissions from industrial firms? Insights from China. Journal of Innovation & Knowl- edge. 2023;8(3):100367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100367 54. Brown C, Shaker RR, Das R. A review of approaches for monitoring and evaluation of urban climate resilience initiatives. Environ Dev Sustain. 2016;20(1):23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9891-7 55. Liang Z. Assessment of the Construction of a Climate Resilient City: An Empirical Study Based on the Difference in Differences Model. Int J Envi- ron Res Public Health. 2021;18(4):2082. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042082 PMID: 33669915