Climate change belief systems across political groups in the United States

S3 Table. Strength centrality difference between worry and other elements. (DOCX) S4 Table. Difference of GDD scores in intra-group comparison of belief systems. (DOCX) S5 Table. Difference of GDD scores in inter-group comparison of belief systems. (DOCX) Author Contributions Conceptualization: Sanguk Lee, Matthew H. Goldberg. Data curation: Seth A. Rosenthal. Formal analysis: Sanguk Lee. Methodology: Sanguk Lee. Resources: Seth A. Rosenthal, Edward W. Maibach, John E. Kotcher, Anthony Leiserowitz. Writing – original draft: Sanguk Lee, Matthew H. Goldberg. Writing – review & editing: Sanguk Lee, Matthew H. Goldberg, Seth A. Rosenthal, Edward W. Maibach, John E. Kotcher, Anthony Leiserowitz. References 1. Goldberg MH, Gustafson A, Ballew MT, Rosenthal SA, Leiserowitz A. Identifying the most important predictors of support for climate policy in the United States. Behav Public Policy. 2021 Oct; 5(4):480– 502. 2. Hornsey MJ, Harris EA, Bain PG, Fielding KS. Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Clim Change. 2016 Jun; 6(6):622–6. 3. Van Der Linden S, Leiserowitz AA, Feinberg GD, Maibach EW. The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. PLOS ONE. 2015 Feb 25; 10(2):e0118489. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118489 PMID: 25714347 4. Verschoor M, Albers C, Poortinga W, Bo¨ hm G, Steg L. Exploring relationships between climate change beliefs and energy preferences: A network analysis of the European Social Survey. Journal of Environ- mental Psychology. 2020 Aug; 70:101435.

5. Ritchie H, Roser M, Rosado P. CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions [Internet]. 2020. https:// ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions 6. Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Rosenthal S, Kotcher J, Carman J, Verner M, et al. Climate change in the American mind: Beliefs & attitudes, December 2022. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication: Yale University and George Mason University; 2023. 7. Brandt MJ, Sibley CG, Osborne D. What is central to political belief system networks? Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Sep 1; 45(9):1352–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218824354 PMID: 30688553 8. Converse PE. The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964). Critical Review. 2006 Jan; 18(1– 3):1–74. 9. Boutyline A, Vaisey S. Belief network analysis: A relational approach to understanding the structure of attitudes. American Journal of Sociology. 2017 Mar; 122(5):1371–447. 10. Dalege J, Borsboom D, van Harreveld F, van den Berg H, Conner M, van der Maas HLJ. Toward a for- malized account of attitudes: The Causal Attitude Network (CAN) model. Psychological Review. 2016 Jan; 123(1):2–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039802 PMID: 26479706 11. Turner-Zwinkels FM, Brandt MJ. Belief system networks can be used to predict where to expect dynamic constraint. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2022 May; 100:104279. 12. Brandt MJ, Sleegers WWA. Evaluating belief system networks as a theory of political belief system dynamics. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2021; 27. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1088868321993751 PMID: 33655780 PLOS ONE

Climate change belief system PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300048 March 20, 2024 15 / 16