Spatiotemporal simulation of sustainable development based on ecosystem services under climate change

42. Li Z, Gao Y, Yu HH, Chen B, Wang L. Soil water retention and hysteresis behaviors of different clayey soils at high suctions. Geomech Eng. 2022; 30(4):373–82. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2022.30.4.373 WOS:000865419400006. 43. Kang MW, Yibeltal M, Kim YH, Oh SJ, Lee JC, Kwon EE, et al. Enhancement of soil physical properties and soil water retention with biochar-based soil amendments. Sci Total Environ. 2022; 836:9. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155746 WOS:000833001100012. PMID: 35525368 44. Shah SM, Liu GY, Yang Q, Wang XQ, Casazza M, Agostinho F, et al. Energy-based valuation of agri- culture ecosystem services and dis-services. J Clean Prod. 2019; 239:17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2019.118019 WOS:000487237100065. 45. Campos P, Alvarez A, Mesa B, Oviedo JL, Ovando P, Caparro´s A. Total income and ecosystem service sustainability index: Accounting applications to holm oak dehesa case study in Andalusia-Spain. Land Use Pol. 2020; 97:41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104692 WOS:000558748500030. 46. Nayak AK, Shahid M, Nayak AD, Dhal B, Moharana KC, Mondal B, et al. Assessment of ecosystem ser- vices of rice farms in eastern India. Ecol Process. 2019; 8(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-019- 0189-1 WOS:000483524300001. 47. Zhu Q, Cai YL. Integrating ecological risk, ecosystem health, and ecosystem services for assessing regional ecological security and its driving factors: Insights from a large river basin in China. Ecol Indic. 2023; 155:11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110954 WOS:001086680700001.

48. Huang SD, Li YJ, Hu HW, Xue PC, Wang J. Assessment of optimal seasonal selection for RSEI con- struction: a case study of ecological environment quality assessment in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from 2001 to 2020. Geocarto Int. 2024; 39(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2024.2311224 WOS:001162963300001. 49. Chen SY, Chen J, Jiang CQ, Yao RT, Xue JM, Bai YF, et al. Trends in Research on Forest Ecosystem Services in the Most Recent 20 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis. Forests. 2022; 13(7):19. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/f13071087 WOS:000833938200001. 50. Li ZG, Sun ZS, Tian YJ, Zhong JL, Yang WN. Impact of Land Use/Cover Change on Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration Ecosystem Services Value: Temporal-Spatial Patterns and Cold/Hot Spots Ecosystem Services Value Change Brought by Urbanization. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16 (1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16010123 WOS:000459111400123. PMID: 30621215 51. Wood SLR, Jones SK, Johnson JA, Brauman KA, Chaplin-Kramer R, Fremier A, et al. Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals. Ecosyst Serv. 2018; 29:70–82. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.010 WOS:000424282600008. 52. Wang RY, Zhao JS, Lin YL, Qin BG, Chen GP, Bao LY, et al. Study on the response and prediction of SDGs based on different climate change scenarios: The case of the urban agglomeration in central Yunnan. Ecol Indic. 2023; 156:13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111076 WOS:001097770500001.

53. Nylund PA, Brem A, Agarwal N. Innovation ecosystems for meeting sustainable development goals: The evolving roles of multinational enterprises. J Clean Prod. 2021; 281:11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2020.125329 WOS:000609018900010. 54. Cooper HD, Mumba M, Dhyani S, Shen XL, Ma KP, Wynberg R, et al. Priorities for progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 15 ’Life on land’. Nat Ecol Evol. 2023; 7(10):1570–5. https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41559-023-02209-3 WOS:001078762200004. PMID: 37783830 55. Maes MJA, Jones KE, Toledano MB, Milligan B. Mapping synergies and trade-offs between urban eco- systems and the sustainable development goals. Environ Sci Policy. 2019; 93:181–8. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.envsci.2018.12.010 WOS:000457508000019. 56. Cheval S, Dumitrescu A, Adamescu M, Cazacu C. Identifying climate change hotspots relevant for eco- systems in Romania. Clim Res. 2020; 80(3):165–73. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01603 WOS:000597222700001. 57. Fan ZM, Fan B, Yue TX. Terrestrial ecosystem scenarios and their response to climate change in Eur- asia. Sci China-Earth Sci. 2019; 62(10):1607–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-018-9374-3 WOS:000488857900008. 58. Jiang B, Chen YY, Bai Y, Xu XB. Supply-Demand Coupling Mechanisms for Policy Design. Sustainabil- ity. 2019; 11(20):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205760 WOS:000498398900217. 59. Lin JY, Huang JL, Prell C, Bryan BA. Changes in supply and demand mediate the effects of land-use change on freshwater ecosystem services flows. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 763:10. https://doi.org/10.

1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143012 WOS:000608188700074. PMID: 33162131 60. Meng QX, Zhang LK, Wei HJ, Cai EX, Xue D, Liu MX. Linking Ecosystem Service Supply-Demand Risks and Regional Spatial Management in the Yihe River Basin, Central China. Land. 2021; 10(8):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080843 WOS:000690511700001. PLOS ONE Sustainable development simulation under climate change: A spatiotemporal ecosystem services approach PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316605 February 4, 2025 18 / 19