Predicting genetic biodiversity in salamanders using geographic, climatic, and life history traits

Writing – original draft: Danielle J. Parsons, Bryan C. Carstens, Tara A. Pelletier. Writing – review & editing: Danielle J. Parsons, Bryan C. Carstens, Tara A. Pelletier. PLOS ONE Predicting hidden lineages in salamanders PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310932 October 18, 2024 16 / 20

References 1. Gadelha LMR, Siracusa PC, Dalcin EC, Silva LAE, Augusto DA, Krempser E, et al. 2021. A survey of biodiversity informatics: Concepts, practices, and challenges. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Dis- covery 11. 2. Guralnick R, Hill A. 2009. Biodiversity informatics: automated approaches for documenting global biodi- versity patterns and processes. Bioinformatics 25: 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/ btn659 PMID: 19129210 3. Whittaker RJ, Arau´jo MB, Jepson P, Ladle RJ, Watson JEM, Willis KJ. 2005. Conservation Biogeogra- phy: assessment and prospect: Conservation Biogeography. Diversity and Distributions 11: 3–23. 4. Mora C, Tittensor DP, Adl S, Simpson AGB, Worm B. 2011. How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean? (Mace GM, Ed.). PLoS Biology 9: e1001127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio. 1001127 PMID: 21886479 5. Moritz C. 1994. Defining ‘Evolutionarily Significant Units’ for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolu- tion 9: 373–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(94)90057-4 PMID: 21236896 6. Mable BK. 2019. Conservation of adaptive potential and functional diversity: integrating old and new approaches. Conservation Genetics 20: 89–100. 7. Jockusch EL, Martı´nez-Solano I, Hansen RW, Wake DB. 2012. Morphological and molecular diversifi- cation of slender salamanders (Caudata: Plethodontidae: Batrachoseps) in the southern Sierra Nevada of California with descriptions of two new species. Zootaxa 3190: 1. 8. Camp CD, Wooten JA. 2016. Hidden in Plain Sight: Cryptic Diversity in the Plethodontidae. Copeia 104: 111–117.

9. Bernardes M, Le MD, Nguyen TQ, Pham CT, Pham AV, Nguyen TT, et al. 2020. Integrative taxonomy reveals three new taxa within the Tylototriton asperrimus complex (Caudata, Salamandridae) from Viet- nam. ZooKeys 935: 121–164. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.935.37138 PMID: 32508505 10. Mead LS, Clayton DR, Nauman RS, Olson DH, Pfrender ME. 2005. Newly discovered populations of salamanders from Siskiyou County California represent a species distinct from Plethodon stormi. Her- petologica 61: 158–177. 11. Parra Olea G, Garcia-Castillo MG, Rovito SM, Maisano JA, Hanken J, Wake DB. 2020. Descriptions of five new species of the salamander genus Chiropterotriton (Caudata: Plethodontidae) from eastern Mexico and the status of three currently recognized taxa. PeerJ 8: e8800. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj. 8800 PMID: 32518712 12. Nauman RS, Olson DH. 2008. Distribution and Conservation Of Plethodon Salamanders On Federal Lands In Siskiyou County, California. Northwestern Naturalist 89: 1. 13. Hortal J, de Bello F, Diniz-Filho JAF, Lewinsohn TM, Lobo JM, Ladle RJ. 2015. Seven Shortfalls that Beset Large-Scale Knowledge of Biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 46: 523–549. 14. Steffen MA, Irwin KJ, Blair AL, Bonett RM. 2014. Larval masquerade: a new species of paedomorphic salamander (Caudata: Plethodontidae: Eurycea) from the Ouachita Mountains of North America. Zoo- taxa 3786: 423. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3786.4.2 PMID: 24869544 15. Nishikawa K, Matsui M. 2014. Three new species of the salamander genus Hynobius (Amphibia, Uro-

dela, Hynobiidae) from Kyushu, Japan. Zootaxa 3852: 203. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3852.2.3 PMID: 25284394 16. Min MS, Baek HJ, Song JY, Chang MH, Poyarkov NAJr. 2016. A new species of salamander of the genus Hynobius (Amphibia, Caudata, Hynobiidae) from South Korea. Zootaxa 4169: 475. PMID: 27701288 17. Kuchta SR, Brown AD, Highton R. 2018. Disintegrating over space and time: Paraphyly and species delimitation in the Wehrle’s Salamander complex. Zoologica Scripta 47: 285–299. 18. Okamiya H, Sugawara H, Nagano M, Poyarkov NA. 2018. An integrative taxonomic analysis reveals a new species of lotic Hynobius salamander from Japan. PeerJ 6: e5084. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj. 5084 PMID: 29942708 19. Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL, Meier R, Winker K, et al. 2007. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22: 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tree.2006.11.004 PMID: 17129636 20. Pfenninger M, Schwenk K. 2007. Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 121. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7- 121 PMID: 17640383 21. Lyman RA, Edwards CE. 2022. Revisiting the comparative phylogeography of unglaciated eastern North America: 15 years of patterns and progress. Ecology and Evolution 12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ ece3.8827 PMID: 35475178 PLOS ONE Predicting hidden lineages in salamanders PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310932 October 18, 2024 17 / 20

22. Blanchet S, Prunier JG, De Kort H. 2017. Time to Go Bigger: Emerging Patterns in Macrogenetics. Trends in Genetics 33: 579–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2017.06.007 PMID: 28720482 23. Leigh DM, van Rees CB, Millette KL, Breed MF, Schmidt C, Bertola LD, et al. 2021. Opportunities and challenges of macrogenetic studies. Nature Reviews Genetics 22: 791–807. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41576-021-00394-0 PMID: 34408318 24. Miraldo A, Li S, Borregaard MK, Flo´rez-Rodrı´guez A, Gopalakrishnan S, Rizvanovic M, et al. 2016. An Anthropocene map of genetic diversity. Science 353: 1532–1535. https://doi.org/10.1126/science. aaf4381 PMID: 27708102 25. Millette KL, Fugère V, Debyser C, Greiner A, Chain FJJ, Gonzalez A. 2020. No consistent effects of humans on animal genetic diversity worldwide (A Mooers, Ed.). Ecology Letters 23: 55–67. 26. Carstens BC, Morales AE, Field K, Pelletier TA. 2018. A global analysis of bats using automated com- parative phylogeography uncovers a surprising impact of Pleistocene glaciation. Journal of Biogeogra- phy 45: 1795–1805. 27. Baranzelli MC, Cosacov A, Sede SM, Nicola MV, Se´ rsic AN. 2022. Anthropocene refugia in Patagonia: A macrogenetic approach to safeguarding the biodiversity of flowering plants. Biological Conservation 268: 109492. 28. Gratton P, Marta S, Bocksberger G, Winter M, Keil P, Trucchi E, et al. 2017. Which Latitudinal Gradients for Genetic Diversity? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 32: 724–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017. 07.007 PMID: 28807398

29. Pelletier TA, Carstens BC. 2018. Geographical range size and latitude predict population genetic struc- ture in a global survey. Biology Letters 14: 20170566. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2017.0566 PMID: 29343561 30. Barrow LN, Fonseca EM, Thompson CEP, Carstens BC. 2021. Predicting amphibian intraspecific genetic diversity with machine learning: Challenges and prospects for integrating traits, geography, and genetic data, Molecular Ecology Resources 21: 2718–2831. 31. Fonseca EM, Pelletier TA, Decker SK, Parsons DJ, Carstens BC. 2023. Pleistocene glaciations caused the latitudinal gradient of within-species genetic diversity, Evolution Letters 7: 331–338. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/evlett/qrad030 PMID: 37829497 32. Pelletier TA, Carstens BC, Tank DC, Sullivan J, Espı´ndola A. 2018. Predicting plant conservation priori- ties on a global scale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115: 13027–13032. https:// doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804098115 PMID: 30509998 33. Raposo MA, Kirwan GM, Lourenc¸o ACC, Sobral G, Bockmann FA, Stopiglia R. 2021. On the notions of taxonomic ‘impediment’, ‘gap’, ‘inflation’ and ‘anarchy’, and their effects on the field of conservation. Systematics and Biodiversity 19: 296–311. 34. Breiman L. 2001. Random Forests. Machine Learning 45: 5–32. 35. Parsons DJ, Pelletier TA, Wieringa JG, Duckett DJ, Bryan C. Carstens. 2022. Analysis of biodiversity data suggests that mammal species are hidden in predictable places. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119: e2103400119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2103400119 PMID: 35344422

36. Smith BT, Seeholzer GF, Harvey MG, Cuervo AM, Brumfield RT. 2017. A latitudinal phylogeographic diversity gradient in birds. PLOS Biology 15: e1002610. 37. Amador L, Arroyo-Torres I, Lisa N. Barrow LN. 2023. Machine learning and phylogenetic models iden- tify predictors of genetic variation in Neotropical amphibians. bioRxiv. 38. Pelletier TA, Parsons DJ, Decker SK, Crouch S, Franz E, Ohrstrom J, et al. 2022. PhylogatR: Phylogeo- graphic data aggregation and repurposing. Molecular Ecology Resources 22: 2830–2842. https://doi. org/10.1111/1755-0998.13673 PMID: 35748425 39. Ba´ nki, O., Roskov, Y., Do¨ ring, M., Ower, G., Vandepitte, L., Hobern, D., et al. 2022. Catalogue of Life Checklist (Y. Roskov, Ed.; Version 2022-05-20). 40. Pelletier TA, Duffield DA, DeGrauw EA. 2011. Rangewide Phylogeography of the Western Red-Backed Salamander (Plethodon vehiculum). Northwestern Naturalist 92: 200–210. 41. Pelletier TA, Crisafulli C, Wagner S, Zellmer AJ, Carstens BC. 2015. Historical Species Distribution Models Predict Species Limits in Western Plethodon Salamanders. Systematic Biology 64: 909–925. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syu090 PMID: 25414176 42. Pelletier TA, Carstens BC. 2016. Comparing range evolution in two western Plethodon salamanders: glacial refugia, competition, ecological niches, and spatial sorting. Journal of Biogeography 43: 2237– 2249. 43. Jones KS, Weisrock DW. 2018. Genomic data reject the hypothesis of sympatric ecological speciation in a clade of Desmognathus salamanders. Evolution 72: 2378–2393. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.

13606 PMID: 30246244 PLOS ONE Predicting hidden lineages in salamanders PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310932 October 18, 2024 18 / 20

44. Pyron RA, O’Connell KA, Lemmon EM, Lemmon AR, Beamer DA. 2020. Phylogenomic data reveal reticulation and incongruence among mitochondrial candidate species in Dusky Salamanders (Des- mognathus). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 146: 1055–7903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ympev.2020.106751 PMID: 32028035 45. Dufresnes C, Brelsford A, Jeffries DL, Mazepa G, Suchan T, Canestrelli D, et al. 2021. Mass of genes rather than master genes underlie the genomic architecture of amphibian speciation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118: e2103963118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2103963118 PMID: 34465621 46. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 3.81. 2023. 47. Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/ molbev/mst010 PMID: 23329690 48. Pons J, Barraclough TG, Gomez-Zurita J, Cardoso A, Duran DP, Hazell S, et al. 2006. Sequence- Based Species Delimitation for the DNA Taxonomy of Undescribed Insects (Hedin M, Ed.). Systematic Biology 55: 595–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150600852011 PMID: 16967577 49. Puillandre N, Lambert A, Brouillet S, Achaz G. 2012. ABGD, Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery for pri- mary species delimitation: ABGD, AUTOMATIC BARCODE GAP DISCOVERY. Molecular Ecology 21: 1864–1877. 50. Puillandre N, Brouillet S, Achaz G. 2021. ASAP: assemble species by automatic partitioning. Molecular

Ecology Resources 21: 609–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13281 PMID: 33058550 51. Carstens BC, Pelletier TA, Reid NM, Satler JD. 2013. How to fail at species delimitation. Molecular Ecol- ogy 22: 4369–4383. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12413 PMID: 23855767 52. Bouckaert R, Vaughan TG, Barido-Sottani J, Duchêne S, Fourment M, Gavryushkina A, et al. 2019. BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis (Pertea M, Ed.). PLOS Computational Biology 15: e1006650. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006650 PMID: 30958812 53. Abadi S, Azouri D, Pupko T, Mayrose I. 2019. Model selection may not be a mandatory step for phylog- eny reconstruction. Nature Communications 10: 934. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08822-w PMID: 30804347 54. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA. 2018. Posterior Summarization in Bayesian Phylogenetics Using Tracer 1.7 (Susko E, Ed.). Systematic Biology 67: 901–904. https://doi.org/10. 1093/sysbio/syy032 PMID: 29718447 55. Ezard T. Fujisawa T. Barraclough T. SPLITS: species’ limits by threshold statistics. R package version 1.0–20. 2009. https://rdrr.io/rforge/splits/. 56. Oliveira BF, São-Pedro VA, Santos-Barrera G, Penone C, Costa GC. 2017. AmphiBIO, a global data- base for amphibian ecological traits. Scientific Data 4: 170123. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.123 PMID: 28872632 57. University of California, Berkeley. AmphibiaWeb. 2023. https://amphibiaweb.org/. 58. Karger DN, Conrad O, Bo¨ hner J, Kawohl T, Kreft H, Soria-Auza RW, et al. 2017. Climatologies at high

resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. Scientific Data 4: 170122. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata. 2017.122 PMID: 28872642 59. Karger, Dirk Nikolaus, Conrad, Olaf, Bo¨hner, Ju¨ rgen, Kawohl, Tobias, Kreft, Holger, Soria-Auza, Rodrigo Wilber, et al. 2021. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areasCHELSA V2.1 (current).: 2.1 KB. 60. NASA. ASTER global digital elevation model version 2. 2011. https://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/gdem.asp. 61. Tuanmu MN, Jetz W. 2015. A global, remote sensing-based characterization of terrestrial habitat het- erogeneity for biodiversity and ecosystem modelling: Global habitat heterogeneity. Global Ecology and Biogeography 24: 1329–1339. 62. European Space Agency. 2009. ESA GlobCover project. 63. Ouellet Dallaire C, Lehner B, Sayre R, Thieme M. 2019. A multidisciplinary framework to derive global river reach classifications at high spatial resolution. Environmental Research Letters 14: 024003. 64. Peduzzi P. 2019. The Disaster Risk, Global Change, and Sustainability Nexus. Sustainability 11: 957. 65. Ellis EC, Klein Goldewijk K, Siebert S, Lightman D, Ramankutty N. 2010. Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000: Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes. Global Ecology and Biogeog- raphy: no-no. 66. Center for International Earth Science Information Network—CIESIN. Socioeconomic Data and Appli- cations Center (SEDAC) Gridded Populations of the World (GPW). 2016. 67. United NationsUNISDR. World Bank Development Economics Research Group (DECRG) Gross

Domestic Product. 2010. https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/0037850. PLOS ONE Predicting hidden lineages in salamanders PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310932 October 18, 2024 19 / 20

68. Hijmans RJ. raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version 3.6–26. 2016. https:// cran.r-project.org/web/packages/raster/index.html. 69. Keitt KH, Bivand R. rgdal: Bindings for the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library. R package version 0.2– 5. 2017. https://cran.r-project.org/package=rgdal. 70. Hijmans RJ, Karney C, Williams E, Vennes C. Geosphere: Spherical trigonometry. R package version 1.5–5. 2016. https://cran.r-project.org/package=geosphere. 71. Wickham H. 2011. The Split-Apply-Combine Strategy for Data Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 40. 72. van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. 2011. mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software 45. 73. Kuhn M. 2008. Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package. Journal of Statistical Soft- ware 28. 74. Keesey M. PhyloPic. https://www.phylopic.org. 75. Taiyun Wei, Viliam Simko. 2021. R package ‘corrplot’: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix. (Version 0.92). 76. Hillis DM. 2019. Species Delimitation in Herpetology. Journal of Herpetology 53: 3. 77. Gostel MR, Kress WJ. 2022. The Expanding Role of DNA Barcodes: Indispensable Tools for Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation. Diversity 14: 213. 78. Yiming L, Siqi W, Chaoyuan C, Jiaqi Z, Supen W, Xianglei H, et al. 2021. Latitudinal gradients in genetic diversity and natural selection at a highly adaptive gene in terrestrial mammals. Ecography 44: 206–218. 79. Darrel FR. 2024. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.2 (December 2023).

Electronic Database accessible at https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/index.php. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. 80. Luo A, Ling C, Ho SYW, Zhu C. 2018. Comparison of Methods for Molecular Species Delimitation Across a Range of Speciation Scenarios. Systematic Biology 67: 830–846. https://doi.org/10.1093/ sysbio/syy011 PMID: 29462495 81. Denton RD, Morales AE, Gibbs HL. 2018. Genome-specific histories of divergence and introgression between an allopolyploid unisexual salamander lineage and two ancestral sexual species. Evolution. 72: 1689–1700. PMID: 29926914 82. Liedtke HC, Wiens JJ, Gomez-Mestre I. 2022. The evolution of reproductive modes and life cycles in amphibians. Nature Communications 13: 7039. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34474-4 PMID: 36396632 83. Wiens JJ. 2015. Explaining large-scale patterns of vertebrate diversity. Biology Letters 11: 20150506. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0506 PMID: 26202428 84. Lourenc¸o A, Gonc¸alves J, Carvalho F, Wang IJ, Velo-Anto´ n G. 2019. Comparative landscape genetics reveals the evolution of viviparity reduces genetic connectivity in fire salamanders. Molecular Ecology 28: 4573–4591. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15249 PMID: 31541595 85. Burbrink FT, Sara Ruane S. 2021. Contemporary Philosophy and Methods for Studying Speciation and Delimiting Species. Ichthyology & Herpetology 109: 874–894. 86. Kozak KH, Wiens JJ. 2010. Accelerated rates of climatic-niche evolution underlie rapid species diversifi- cation: Niche evolution and rapid diversification. Ecology Letters 13: 1378–1389.