The impact of place and legacy framing on climate action: A lifespan approach

3. Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Dirzo R. Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. [cited 2019 Jun 2]; Available from: www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/ 10.1073/pnas.1704949114 4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Global warming of 1.5˚C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5˚C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change [Internet]. IPCC; 2018 [cited 2019 Jun 2]. Available from: http://www.ipcc.ch/report/sr15/ 5. Watts N, Amann M, Ayeb-Karlsson S, Belesova K, Bouley T, Boykoff M, et al. The Lancet countdown on health and climate change: from 25 years of inaction to a global transformation for public health. Lan- cet [Internet]. 2017 Feb 10 [cited 2019 Jun 2]; 391(10120):581–630. Available from: http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29096948 PMID: 29096948 6. Gifford R. The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adap- tation. Am Psychol [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2018 Oct 12]; 66(4):290–302. Available from: http://doi.apa. org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0023566 PMID: 21553954 7. Spence A, Pidgeon N. Framing and communicating climate change: the effects of distance and out- come frame manipulations. Glob Environ Chang [Internet]. 2010 Oct 1 [cited 2018 Oct 12]; 20(4):656– 67. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959378010000610

8. Jones C, Hine DW, Marks ADG. The future is now: reducing psychological distance to increase public engagement with climate change. Risk Anal [Internet]. 2017 Feb 1 [cited 2019 Jun 2]; 37(2):331–41. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/risa.12601 PMID: 26989845 9. van der Linden S, Maibach E, Leiserowitz A. Improving public engagement with climate change: five “best practice” insights from Psychological Science. Perspect Psychol Sci [Internet]. 2015 Nov 17 [cited 2019 Jun 2]; 10(6):758–63. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/ 1745691615598516 PMID: 26581732 10. Deller J, Liedtke PM, Maxin LM. Old-age security and silver workers: an empirical survey identifies chal- lenges for companies, insurers and society. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract [Internet]. 2009 Jan 29 [cited 2019 Jun 2]; 34(1):137–57. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/gpp.2008.44 11. Milfont TL, Sibley CG. Exploring the concept of environmental generativity. Int J Hisp Psychol [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2019 Jun 2]; 4(1):21–30. Available from: https://search.proquest.com/openview/ 384fd868d08c1a72835b873bb8bc2590/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2034866 12. Hudson RB. Draining the swamp while making America great again: senior dissonance in the age of Trump. J Aging Soc Policy [Internet]. 2018 Aug 8 [cited 2019 Jun 2]; 30(3–4):357–71. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08959420.2018.1462676 PMID: 29652603 13. Cohen GD. The mature mind: the positive power of the aging brain. Basic Books; 2005.

14. Scannell L, Gifford R. The experienced psychological benefits of place attachment. J Environ Psychol [Internet]. 2017 Aug 1 [cited 2019 Jun 2]; 51:256–69. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/abs/pii/S0272494417300518 15. Devine-Wright P. Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. J Community Appl Soc Psychol [Internet]. 2009 Nov 1 [cited 2019 Jun 2]; 19 (6):426–41. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/casp.1004 16. Rubinstein RI, Parmelee PA. Attachment to place and the representation of the life course by the elderly. In: Place Attachment [Internet]. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1992 [cited 2019 Jun 2]. p. 139–63. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4684-8753-4_7 17. Burholt V. “Adref”: theoretical contexts of attachment to place for mature and older people in rural North Wales. Environ Plan A Econ Sp [Internet]. 2006 Jun 1 [cited 2019 Jun 2]; 38(6):1095–114. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a3767 18. Gilleard C, Hyde M, Higgs P. The impact of age, place, aging in place, and attachment to place on the well-being of the over 50s in England. Res Aging [Internet]. 2007 Nov 17 [cited 2019 Jun 2]; 29(6):590– 605. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0164027507305730 19. Devine-Wright P. Think global, act local? The relevance of place attachments and place identities in a climate changed world. Glob Environ Chang [Internet]. 2013 Feb 1 [cited 2019 Jun 2]; 23(1):61–9. Avail-

able from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959378012001100 20. Groulx M, Lewis J, Lemieux C, Dawson J. Place-based climate change adaptation: a critical case study of climate change messaging and collective action in Churchill, Manitoba. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 2014 Dec 1 [cited 2019 Jun 2]; 132:136–47. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0169204614002126 21. Kellert SR, Wilson EO, editors. The Biophilia hypothesis. Island Press; 1993. Impact of framing on climate action PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228963 February 25, 2020 15 / 17