Effect of climate change-induced water-deficit stress on long-term rice yield

28. Ullah H, Luc PD, Gautam A, Datta A. Growth, yield and silicon uptake of rice (Oryza sativa) as influ- enced by dose and timing of silicon application under water-deficit stress. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2018; 64: 318–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2017.1350782 29. Tao F, Hayashi Y, Zhang Z, Sakamoto T. Global warming, rice production and water use in China: developing a probabilistic assessment. Agric For Meteorol. 2008; 148: 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.agrformet.2007.09.012 30. Yang X, Wang B, Chen L, Li P, Cao C. The different influences of drought stress at the flowering stage on rice physiological traits, grain yield, and quality. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-019-40161-0 PMID: 30842474 31. Parry ML, Rosenzweig C, Livermore M. Climate change, global food supply and risk of hunger. Philos Trans Biol Sci. 2005; 360: 2125–2138. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1751 PMID: 16433098 32. Navarro-Racines C, Tarapues J, Thornton P, Jarvis A, Ramirez-Villegas J. High-resolution and bias- corrected CMIP5 projections for climate change impact assessments. Sci Data. 2020; 7: 7. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41597-019-0343-8 PMID: 31959765 33. Dimitriadou S, Nikolakopoulos KG. Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) methods implemented as Arc- Map models with remote-sensed and ground-based inputs, examined along with MODIS ET, for Pelo- ponnese, Greece. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. 2021; 10: 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10060390 34. FAO. ETo calculator. Land and water digital media series N 36. FAO, Roma, Italy. 2012.

35. Tyagi NK, Sharma DK, Luthra SK. Determination of evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of rice and sunflower with lysimeter. Agric Water Manag. 2000; 45: 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774 (99)00071-2 36. Brouwer C, Heibloem M. Irrigation water management: irrigation water needs. Training manual 3. 1986. 37. Qiu R, Katul GG, Wang J, Xu J, Kang S, Liu C, et al., Differential response of rice evapotranspiration to varying patterns of warming. Agric Forest Meteor. 2021; 298: 108293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. agrformet.2020.108293 38. Zhang X, Kang S, Zhang L, Liu J. Spatial variation of climatology monthly crop reference evapotranspi- ration and sensitivity coefficients in Shiyang river basin of northwest China. Agric Water Manag. 2010; 97: 1506–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.05.004 39. Prăvălie R, Piticar A, Roșca B, Sfıˆcă L, Bandoc G, Tiscovschi A, et al. Spatio-temporal changes of the climatic water balance in Romania as a response to precipitation and reference evapotranspiration trends during 1961–2013. CATENA. 2019; 172: 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.08. 028 40. Chaves MM, Oliveira MM. Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. J Exp Bot. 2004; 55: 2365–2384. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh269 PMID: 15475377 41. Passioura J. The drought environment: physical, biological and agricultural perspectives. J Exp Bot. 2007; 58: 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl212 PMID: 17122406

42. Cha-Um S, Yooyongwech S, Supaibulwatana K. Water deficit stress in the reproductive stage of four indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. Pak J Bot. 2010; 42: 3387–3398. 43. Trenberth KE. Changes in precipitation with climate change. Clim Res. 2011; 47: 123–138. https://doi. org/10.3354/cr00953 44. Le Toan T, Ribbes F, Wang LF, Floury N, Ding KH, Kong JA, et al. Rice crop mapping and monitoring using ERS-1 data based on experiment and modeling results. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 1997; 35: 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.551933 45. Bouman BAM. A conceptual framework for the improvement of crop water productivity at different spa- tial scales. Agric Syst. 2007; 93: 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2006.04.004 46. Lafitte HR, Price AH, Courtois B. Yield response to water deficit in an upland rice mapping population: associations among traits and genetic markers. Theor Appl Genet. 2004; 109: 1237–1246. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00122-004-1731-8 PMID: 15490102 47. Kumar A, Nayak AK, Pani DR, Das BS. Physiological and morphological responses of four different rice cultivars to soil water potential based deficit irrigation management strategies. Field Crops Res. 2017; 205: 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.01.026 48. Lobell DB. Changes in diurnal temperature range and national cereal yields. Agric For Meteorol. 2007; 145: 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.05.002 49. Chang TC. Evolvement and background of rice culture in Taiwan. In: Chang TC (eds.) The history of

development of rice culture in Taiwan, 9–18. Agriculture and Forestry Division, Taiwan Provincial Gov- ernment Press, Taiwan. 1999. PLOS ONE Effect of climate change-induced water-deficit stress on long-term rice yield PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284290 April 17, 2023 13 / 14