Cultural probes for environmental education: Designing learning materials to engage children and teenagers with local biodiversity

39. Caeiro A. Aquela Senhora tem um Piano. Arquivo Pessoa. http://arquivopessoa.net/textos/3514 40. Silva L, Silva L, Smith CW, Smith CW. A quantitative approach to the study of non-indigenous plants: an example from the Azores archipelago. Biodiversity & Conservation. 2006; 15(5):1661–79. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-5015-z 41. Ratinaud P. IRaMuTeQ: Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Ques- tionnaires. 2009. http://www.iramuteq.org 42. Alves-Mazzotti AJ. Representac¸ões da identidade docente: uma contribuic¸ão para a formulac¸ão de polı´ticas. Ensaio: Avaliac¸ão e Polı´ticas Pu´ blicas Em Educac¸ão. 2007. https://www.scielo.br/j/ensaio/a/ pqgh43MXqYxz7LzgXJS7Vwg/abstract/?lang=pt 43. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Armok: IBM Corp.; 2020. 44. Litfin KT. Framing science: precautionary discourse and the ozone treaties. Millennium. 1995 Jul 1; 24 (2):251–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298950240020501 45. Varela P, Costa MF. Explore the concept of “light” and its interaction with matter: an inquiry-based sci- ence education project in primary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2015; 605(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/605/1/012041 46. Stevenson RJ, Mahmut M, Sundqvist N. Age-related changes in odor discrimination. Developmental Psychology. 2007; 43(1):253–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.253 PMID: 17201523 47. Blakemore S. J, Choudhury S. Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function

and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.2006; 47(3–4):296–312. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01611.x PMID: 16492261 48. Cornelius-White J. Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. 2007; 77(1):113–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298563 49. Brauman Kate A., Garibaldi Lucas Alejandro, Polasky Stephen, Zayas Cynthia, Thomas Aumeeruddy, Yildiz Brancalion, Pedro, et al. Chapter 2.3 Status and trends—Nature’s Contributions to People. In: Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services [Internet]. Intergovernmental Sci- ence-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES); 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.3832035 50. Saari A, Mullen J. Dark places: environmental education research in a world of hyperobjects. Environ- mental Education Research. 2020 Oct 2; 26(9–10):1466–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018. 1522618 51. Problems Garrard G. and prospects in ecocritical pedagogy. Environmental Education Research. 2010; 16(2):233–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504621003624704 52. Gaver W. Science and Design: The Implications of Different Forms of Accountability. Ways of Knowing in HCI. 2014:143–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_7 PLOS ONE Cultural probes for environmental education PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262853 February 10, 2022 30 / 30