Cultural probes for environmental education: Designing learning materials to engage children and teenagers with local biodiversity

16. Borges PAV, Lamelas-Lopez L, Amorim IR, Danielczak A, Boieiro M, Rego C, et al. Species conserva- tion profiles of cave-dwelling arthropods from Azores, Portugal. Biodiversity Data Journal. 2019; 7: e32530–e32530. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e32530 PMID: 31105442 17. Field Guide [Internet]. [cited 2021 Sep 15]. https://field-guide.info 18. Sousa D, Silva A R, Amorim I R, Ashby S, Arroz AM, Piasentin F, et al. The Field Guide app: connecting island communities to local conservation through mobile interaction. Proceedings of the 10th Interna- tional Conference on Communities & Technologies (C&T). Seatlle, WA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2021. https://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/4200 19. Gaver B, Dunne T, Pacenti E. Design: cultural probes. interactions. 1999; 6(1):21–9. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235 20. Celikoglu OM, Ogut ST, Krippendorff K. How do user stories inspire design? A study of cultural probes. Design Issues. 2017; 33(2):84–98. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00441 21. Gaver W, Boucher A, Pennington S, Walker B. Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. interac- tions. 2004; 11(5):53–6. https://interactions.acm.org/archive/view/september-october-2004/cultural- probes-and-the-value-of-uncertainty1 22. Thoring K, Luippold C, Mueller R. Opening the cultural probes box: A critical reflection and analysis of the cultural probes method. 5th International Congress of International Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR). 2013. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252627658_Opening_the_

Cultural_Probes_Box_A_Critical_Reflection_and_Analysis_of_the_Cultural_Probes_Method 23. Braus J, Wood D. Environmental education in the schools: creating a program that works! Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental Education (NAAEE) in conjunction with the ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education, The Ohio State University. 1994. https://files.peacecorps.gov/multimedia/pdf/library/M0044.pdf 24. Tolppanen S, Aksela M. Identifying and addressing students’ questions on climate change. The Journal of Environmental Education. 2018; 49(5):375–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1417816 25. King A. Facilitating Elaborative Learning Through Guided Student-Generated Questioning. Educational Psychologist. 1992; 27(1):111–26. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2701_8 26. Nappi J. The Importance of Questioning in Developing Critical Thinking Skills. Delta Kappa Gamma Bul- letin. 2017; 84(1):30–41. https://cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/cobblearning.net/dist/6/3101/files/2018/05/ The-Importance-of-Questioning-2aqkc5j.pdf 27. Jørgensen K-A. Bringing the jellyfish home: environmental consciousness and “sense of wonder” in young children’s encounters with natural landscapes and places. Environmental Education Research. 2016; 22(8):1139–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1068277 28. Lindholm M. Promoting curiosity? Possibilities and pitfalls in science education. Sci & Educ. 2018; 27: 987–1002. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-0015-7

29. Kidman G, Casinader N. Differences in Perspective: The Impact of Culture on Inquiry. In: Inquiry-Based Teaching and Learning across Disciplines: Comparative Theory and Practice in Schools [Internet]. Lon- don: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2017:47–62. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53463-7_3 30. Sauve´ L. Currents in environmental education: mapping a complex and evolving pedagogical field. Cana- dian Journal of Environmental Education. 2005; 10(1):11–37. https://cjee.lakeheadu.ca/article/view/175 31. Lyotard J. F. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. University of Minnesota Press. 1984. 32. Jickling B. Making ethics an everyday activity: how can we reduce the barriers? Canadian Journal of Environmental Education. 2004; 9(1): 11–26. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ881761 33. Iared VG, Oliveira HT de, Reid A. Aesthetic experiences in the Cerrado (Brazilian savanna): contribu- tions to environmental education practice and research. Environmental Education Research. 2017 Oct 21; 23(9):1273–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1312290 34. Silva LF, Ojeda Land E, Luengo JLR, editors. Flora e Fauna Terrestre Invasora na Macarone´ sia: TOP 100 nos Ac¸ores, Madeira e Cana´ rias. Ponta Delgada, Azores: ARENA; 2008. 35. Presidência do Governo-Região Auto´noma dos Ac¸ores. Decreto Regulamentar Regional n.o 17/2011/ A [Internet]. 2011. https://dre.pt/web/guest/analisejuridica/-/aj/31812818/init/maximized?p_p_auth= 1Ja0rsxy&mode=dt 36. Xavier H. Statistics of EE Actions of Schools in Areas of the Terceira Natural Park (2014/15 to 2020/21). 2021.

37. Lazonder AW, Harmsen R. Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: effects of guidance. Review of Edu- cational Research. 2016; 86(3):681–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366 38. King A. Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal. 1994; 31(2):338–68. https://doi.org/10. 3102/00028312031002338 PLOS ONE Cultural probes for environmental education PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262853 February 10, 2022 29 / 30