Acoustic approach as an alternative to human-based survey in bird biodiversity monitoring in agricultural meadows

46. Hardin JW, Hilbe JM. Generalized Estimating Equations. 2nd Edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2013. 47. Leach EC, Burwell CJ, Ashton LA, Jones DN, Kitching RL. Comparison of point counts and automated acoustic monitoring: detecting birds in a rainforest biodiversity survey. Emu. 2016; 116: 305–309. https://doi.org/10.1071/MU15097 48. Ta¨ tte K, Møller AP, Ma¨nd R. Towards an integrated view of escape decisions in birds: relation between flight initiation distance and distance fled. Anim Behav. 2018; 136: 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. anbehav.2017.12.008 49. Kubacka J, Oppel S, Dyrcz A, Lachmann L, da Costa JPDB, Kail U, et al. Effect of mowing on productiv- ity in the endangered Aquatic Warbler Acrocephalus paludicola. 2013; 24: 45–58. https://doi.org/10. 3389/fevo.2021.671492 50. Holmes SB, McIlwrick KA, Venier LA. Using automated sound recording and analysis to detect bird spe- cies- at-risk in southwestern Ontario woodlands. Wild Soc Bull. 2014; 38: 591–598. https://doi.org/10. 1002/wsb.421 51. Zwart MC, Baker A, McGowan PJK, Whittingham MJ. The use of automated bioacoustic recorders to replace human wildlife surveys: an example using nightjars. Plos One. 2014; 9: e102770. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102770 PMID: 25029035 52. Sueur J, Farina A, Gasc A, Pieretti N, Pavoine S. Acoustic indices for biodiversity assessment and land- scape investigation. Acta Acust United Acust. 2014; 100: 772–781. https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA. 918757 PLOS ONE Acoustic bird biodiversity monitoring in agricultural meadows