Acoustic approach as an alternative to human-based survey in bird biodiversity monitoring in agricultural meadows

8. Farina A, Pieretti N, Piccioli L. The soundscape methodology for long-term bird monitoring: A Mediterra- nean Europe case-study. Ecol Inform. 2011; 6: 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2011.07.004 9. Shonfield J, Bayne EM. Autonomous recording units in avian ecological research: current use and future applications. Avian Conserv Ecol. 2017; 12: 14. https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-00974-120114 10. Darras K, Bata´ry P, Furnas BJ, Grass I, Mulyani YA, Tscharntke T. Autonomous sound recording out- performs human observation for sampling birds: a systematic map and user guide. Ecol Appl. 2019; 29: e01954. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1954 PMID: 31206926 11. Sugai LSM, Desjonquères C, Silva TSF, Llusia D. A roadmap for survey designs in terrestrial acoustic monitoring. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv. 2019; 6: 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.131 12. Sugai LSM, Silva TSF, Ribeiro JW, Llusia D. Terrestrial passive acoustic monitoring: review and per- spectives. BioScience. 2019; 69: 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy147 13. Stowell D, Plumbley MD. Automatic large-scale classification of bird sounds is strongly improved by unsupervised feature learning. PeerJ. 2014; 2: e488. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.488 PMID: 25083350 14. Vokurkova´ J, Motombi FN, Ferencet M, Hořa´ k D, Sedla´ ček O. Seasonality of vocal activity of a bird community in an Afrotropical lowland rain forest. J Trop Ecol. 2018; 34: 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0266467418000056 15. Sauer JR, Peterjohn BG, Link WA. Observer differences in the North American breeding bird survey.

Auk. 1994; 111: 50–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/4088504 16. Farmer RG, Leonar ML, Flemming JEM, Anderson SC. Observer aging and long-term avian survey data quality. Ecol Evol. 2014; 4: 2563–2576. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1101 PMID: 25360286 17. Bombaci SP, Pejchar L. Using paired acoustic sampling to enhance population monitoring of New Zeal- and’s forest birds. N Z J Ecol. 2019; 43: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.20417/nzjecol.43.9 18. Vold ST, Handel CM, McNew LB. Comparison of acoustic recorders and field observers for monitoring tundra bird communities. Wild Soc Bull. 2017; 41: 566–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.785 19. Haselmayer J, Quinn JS. A comparison of point counts and sound recording as bird survey methods in Amazonian Southeast Peru. Condor. 2000; 102: 887–893. https://doi.org/10.2307/1370317 20. Celis-Murillo A, Deppe JL, Allen MF. Using soundscape recordings to estimate bird species abundance, richness, and composition. J Field Ornithol. 2009; 80: 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1557-9263. 2009.00206.x 21. Wheeldon A, Mossman HL, Sullivan MJP, Mathenge J, de Kort SR. Comparison of acoustic and tradi- tional point count methods to assess bird diversity and composition in the Aberdare National Park, Kenya. Afr J Ecol. 2019; 57: 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.12596 22. Klingbeil BT, Willig MR. Bird biodiversity assessments in temperate forest: the value of point count ver- sus acoustic monitoring protocols. PeerJ. 2015; 3: e973. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.973 PMID: 26038728

23. Kułaga K, Budka M. Bird species detection by an observer and an autonomous sound recorder in two different environments: Forest and farmland. PLoS ONE. 2019; 14: e0211970. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0211970 PMID: 30730984 24. Yip DA, Leston L, Bayne EM, So´ lymos P, Grover A. Experimentally derived detection distances from audio recordings and human observers enable integrated analysis of point count data. Avian Conserv Ecol. 2017; 12: 11. https://doi.org/10.5751/ace-00997-120111 25. Catchpole CK, Slater PJB. Bird song: Biological themes and variations ( 2nd ed.). Cambridge Univer- sity Press; 2008. 26. Brumm H. Song amplitude and body size in birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2009; 63: 1157–1165. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0743-4 27. Podos J, Cohn-Haft M. Extremely loud mating songs at close range in white bellbirds. Curr Biol. 2019; 29: R1068–R1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.028 PMID: 31639347 28. Rempel RS, Francis CM, Robinson JN, Campbell M. Comparison of audio recording system perfor- mance for detecting and monitoring songbirds. J Field Ornithol. 2013; 84: 86–97. https://doi.org/10. 1111/jofo.12008 29. Yip D, Bayne EM, So´ lymos P, Campbell J, Proppe D. Sound attenuation in forest and roadside environ- ments: Implications for avian point-count surveys. Condor. 2017; 119: 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1650/ CONDOR-16-93.1 30. van Wilgenburg SL, So´lymos P, Kardynal KJ, Frey MD. Paired sampling standardizes point count data from humans and acoustic recorders. Avian Conserv Ecol. 2017; 12: 13. https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE- 00975-120113

PLOS ONE Acoustic bird biodiversity monitoring in agricultural meadows PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266557 April 8, 2022 14 / 16