Thông tin tài nguyên

Biodiversity patterns of epipelagic copepods in the South Pacific Ocean: Strengths and limitations of current data bases

pmc-PMC11238982.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 28 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 28 · Đoạn 75Vị trí nguồn

130. Hortal J, De Bello F, Diniz-Filho JAF, Lewinsohn TM, Lobo JM, Ladle RJ. Seven Shortfalls that Beset Large-Scale Knowledge of Biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2015; 46: 523–549. https://doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054400 131. Ball-Damerow JE, Brenskelle L, Barve N, Soltis PS, Sierwald P, Bieler R, et al. Research applications of primary biodiversity databases in the digital age. PLoS One. 2019; 14. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0215794 PMID: 31509534 132. Nelson G, Ellis S. The history and impact of digitization and digital data mobilization on biodiversity research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Royal Society Pub- lishing; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0391 PMID: 30455209 133. Page LM, Macfadden BJ, Fortes JA, Soltis PS, Riccardi G. Digitization of Biodiversity Collections Reveals Biggest Data on Biodiversity. BioScience. Oxford University Press; 2015. pp. 841–842. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv104 134. Ariño AH. Approaches to estimating the universe of natural history collections data. Biodivers Informat- ics. 2010; 7: 81–92. https://doi.org/10.17161/bi.v7i2.3991 135. Isaac NJB, van Strien AJ, August TA, de Zeeuw MP, Roy DB. Statistics for citizen science: Extracting signals of change from noisy ecological data. Methods Ecol Evol. 2014; 5: 1052–1060. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/2041-210X.12254 136. Garcı´a-Rosello´ E, Guisande C, Manjarre´s-Herna´ndez A, Gonza´ lez-Dacosta J, Heine J, Pelayo-Villa-

Trang 28 · Đoạn 76Vị trí nguồn

mil P, et al. Can we derive macroecological patterns from primary Global Biodiversity Information Facility data? Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2015; 24: 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12260 137. Gaylord B, Gaines SD. Temperature or transport? Range limits in marine species mediated solely by flow. Am Nat. 2000; 155: 769–789. https://doi.org/10.1086/303357 138. Navarrete SA, Broitman B, Wieters EA, Finke GR, Venegas RM, Sotomayor A. Recruitment of inter- tidal invertebrates in the southeast Pacific: Interannual variability and the 1997–1998 El Niño. Limnol Ocean. 2002; 47: 791–802. Available: http://www.pfeg.noaa.gov 139. Watson JR, Hays CG, Raimondi PT, Mitarai S, Dong C, McWilliams JC, et al. Currents connecting communities: nearshore community similarity and ocean circulation. Ecology. 2011. https://doi.org/10. 1890/10-1436.1 PMID: 21797147 140. Coleman MA, Feng M, Roughan M, Cetina-Heredia P, Connell SD. Temperate shelf water dispersal by Australian boundary currents: Implications for population connectivity. Limnol Oceanogr Fluids Environ. 2013; 3: 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1215/21573689-2409306 141. Wernberg T, Thomsen MS, Connell SD, Russell BD, Waters JM, Zuccarello GC, et al. The footprint of continental-scale ocean currents on the biogeography of seaweeds. PLoS One. 2013; 8. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080168 PMID: 24260352 PLOS ONE Biodiversity of copepods in the South Pacific PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306440 July 11, 2024 28 / 28