Pastoralism in the highest peaks: Role of the traditional grazing systems in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem function in the alpine Himalaya

22. Zhang W, Miller PA, Smith B, Wania R, Koenigk T, Do¨scher R. Tundra shrubification and tree-line advance amplify arctic climate warming: results from an individual-based dynamic vegetation model. Environ Res Lett. 2013; 8: 034023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034023 23. Post E, Pedersen C. Opposing plant community responses to warming with and without herbivores. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105: 12353–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802421105 PMID: 18719116 24. Olofsson J, Oksanen L, Callaghan T, Hulme P., Oksanen T, Suominen O. Herbivores inhibit climate- driven shrub expansion on the tundra. Glob Chang Biol. 2009; 15: 2681–2693. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01935.x 25. Myers-Smith IH, Forbes BC, Wilmking M, Hallinger M, Lantz T, Blok D, et al. Shrub expansion in tun- dra ecosystems: dynamics, impacts and research priorities. Environ Res Lett. 2011; 6: 045509. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/045509 26. Verma M, Schulte to Bu¨ hne H, Lopes M, Ehrich D, Sokovnina S, Hofhuis SP, et al. Can reindeer hus- bandry management slow down the shrubification of the Arctic? J Environ Manage. 2020; 267: 110636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110636 PMID: 32421670 27. Mittermeier RA, Turner WR, Larsen FW, Brooks TM, Gascon C. Global Biodiversity Conservation: The Critical Role of Hotspots. In: Zachos FE, Habel JC, editors. Biodiversity Hotspots: Distribution and Protection of Conservation Priority Areas. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011. pp. 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20992-5_1

28. Ning W, Rawat G, Joshi S, Ismail M, Sharma E, editors. High-altitude rangelands and their interfaces in the Hindu Kush Himalayas. Kathmandu: ICIMOD; 2013. 29. Shrestha UB, Gautam S, Bawa KS. Widespread climate change in the Himalayas and associated changes in local ecosystems. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e36741. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0036741 PMID: 22615804 30. Telwala Y, Brook BW, Manish K, Pandit MK. Climate-induced elevational range shifts and increase in plant species richness in a Himalayan biodiversity epicentre. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e57103. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057103 PMID: 23437322 31. Pandey R, Khadka KK, Ghimire A, Jha P, Pathak U. Elevational distribution of butterflies in the Himala- yas: a case study from Langtang National Park, Nepal. J Mt Sci. 2017; 14: 1384–1390. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11629-017-4360-9 32. Tiwari A, Fan Z-X, Jump AS, Li S-F, Zhou Z-K. Gradual expansion of moisture sensitive Abies spect- abilis forest in the Trans-Himalayan zone of central Nepal associated with climate change. Dendro- chronologia. 2017; 41: 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DENDRO.2016.01.006 33. Anderson K, Fawcett D, Cugulliere A, Benford S, Jones D, Leng R. Vegetation expansion in the subni- val Hindu Kush Himalaya. Glob Chang Biol. 2020; gcb.14919. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14919 PMID: 31918454 34. Xu J, Grumbine RE, Shrestha A, Eriksson M, Yang X, Wang Y, et al. The melting Himalayas: cascad- ing effects of climate change on water, biodiversity, and livelihoods. Conserv Biol. 2009; 23: 520–30.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01237.x PMID: 22748090 PLOS ONE Role of the traditional grazing systems in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem function in alpine Himalaya PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245221 January 7, 2021 15 / 19

2012. http://www.sikkimforest.gov.in/Grazing-ban-study.htm 42. Bhagwat S, Diwan M, Venkataramani V. Analysis of Grazing Exclusion Policy through a Climate Change Mitigation Lens: Case Studies from Barsey Rhododendron Sanctuary,West Sikkim. In: Arra- watia ML, Tambe S, editors. Climate Change in Sikkim—Patterns, Impacts and Initiatives. Gangtok: Information and Public Relations Department Government of Sikkim; 2012. pp. 351–368. 43. Tambe S, Bhutia N, Arrawatia M. People’s opinion on the Impacts of “Ban on Grazing” in Barsey Rho- dodendron Sanctuary. Sikkim, India. The Mountain Institute. Gangtok, Sikkim. Gangtok, Sikkim; 2005. http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/content/334371/peoples-opinion-on-the-impacts-of- ban-on-grazing-in-barsey-rhododendron-sanctuary-sikkim-india/ 44. Singh P, Chauhan A. Plant Diversity in Sikkim Himalaya. In: Hajra P, Mugda V, editors. Plant Diversity and Hotspots in India. Calcutta: BSI; 1997. pp. 137–162. 45. Ingty T, Bawa KS. Climate change and indigenous people. In: Arrawatia ML, Tambe S, editors. Cli- mate Change in Sikkim Patterns, Impacts and Initiatives. Information and Public Relations Depart- ment,Government of Sikkim, Gangtok; 2012. pp. 275–290. 46. Briggs JM, Knapp AK. Interannual variability in primary production in tallgrass prairie: climate, soil moisture, topographic position, and fire as determinants of aboveground biomass. Am J Bot. 1995; 82: 1024–1030. 47. Smith MD, Knapp AK. Dominant species maintain ecosystem function with non-random species loss. Ecol Lett. 2003; 6: 509–517.

48. Rodgers WA, Panwar HS. Planning a wildlife protected area network in India. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun; 1988. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=XF9093847 49. Government of Sikkim. 19th Livestock Census, 2012. II. Gangtok, Sikkim; 2012. http://www.sikkim- ahvs.gov.in/Download/Report2.pdf 50. Ingty T. High mountain communities and climate change: adaptation, traditional ecological knowledge, and institutions. Clim Change. 2017; 145: 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2080-3 51. Joshi S, Shrestha L, Bisht N, Wu N, Ismail M, Dorji T, et al. Ethnic and Cultural Diversity amongst Yak Herding Communities in the Asian Highlands. Sustainability. 2020; 12: 957. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su12030957 52. LP DAAC. ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM) v2. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC,. Sioux Falls, South Dakota; 2014. 53. McNaughton SJ, Milchunas DG, Frank DA. How can net Primary Productivity be Measured in Grazing Ecosystems? Ecology. 1996; 77: 974–977. https://doi.org/10.2307/2265518 54. Leroy B, Petillon J, Gallon R, Canard A, Ysnel F. Improving occurrence-based rarity metrics in conser- vation studies by including multiple rarity cut-off points. Insect Conserv Divers. 2012; 5: 159–168. 55. Guisande C, Heine J, Garcı´a-Rosello´ E, Gonza´ lez-Dacosta J, Vilas LG, Perez-Schofield BJG. DER: An algorithm for comparing species diversity between assemblages. Ecol Indic. 2017; 81: 41–46. https://doi.org/https%3A//doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.049

56. Menhinick E. A Comparison of Some Species-Individuals Diversity Indices Applied to Samples of Field Insects. Ecology. 1964; 45: 859–861. PLOS ONE Role of the traditional grazing systems in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem function in alpine Himalaya PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245221 January 7, 2021 16 / 19

57. McIntosh R. "An index of diversity and the relation of certain concepts to diversity. Ecology. 1967; 48: 392–404. 58. Warwick RM, Clarke KR. Taxonomic distinctness and environmental assessment. J Appl Ecol. 1998; 35: 532–543. 59. Clarke KR, Warwick RM. A taxonomic distinctness index and its statistical properties. J Appl Ecol. 1998; 35: 523–531. 60. R Development Core Team. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria; 2017. http://www.r-project.org/ 61. Tyler CL, Kowalewski M. Utility of Marine Benthic Associations as a Multivariate Proxy of Paleobathy- metry: A Direct Test from Recent Coastal Ecosystems of North Carolina. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e95711. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095711 PMID: 24752221 62. Dexter E, Rollwagen-Bollens G, Bollens SM. The trouble with stress: A flexible method for the evalua- tion of nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Limnol Oceanogr Methods. 2018; 16: 434–443. https://doi. org/10.1002/lom3.10257 63. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P., O’Hara R., et al. Vegan: Community Ecol- ogy Package. R Package Version 2.2–0. 2014. 64. McNaughton SJ. Ecology of a Grazing Ecosystem: The Serengeti. Ecol Monogr. 1985; 55: 259–294. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942578 65. Haynes MA, Fang Z, Waller DM. Grazing impacts on the diversity and composition of alpine range- lands in Northwest Yunnan. J Plant Ecol. 2013; 6: 122–130. 66. Pulungan MA, Suzuki S, Gavina MKA, Tubay JM, Ito H, Nii M, et al. Grazing enhances species diver-

sity in grassland communities. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 11201. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47635-1 PMID: 31371753 67. Lu X, Kelsey KC, Yan Y, Sun J, Wang X, Cheng G, et al. Effects of grazing on ecosystem structure and function of alpine grasslands in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: a synthesis. Ecosphere. 2017; 8: e01656. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1656 68. Aryal S, Cockfield G, Maraseni TN. Effect of summer livestock grazing on plant species richness and composition in the Himalayan rangelands. Rangel J. 2015; 37: 321. https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ14088 69. Bagchi S, Ritchie ME. Herbivore effects on above- and belowground plant production and soil nitrogen availability in the Trans-Himalayan shrub-steppes. Oecologia. 2010; 164: 1075–1082. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00442-010-1690-5 PMID: 20585808 70. Kala C, Rawat G. Effects of livestock grazing on the species diversity and biomass production in the alpine meadows of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Trop Ecol. 1999; 40: 69–74. 71. Sundriyal RC, Joshi AP. Effect of grazing on standing crop, productivity and efficiency of energy cap- ture in an alpine grassland ecosystem at Tungnath (Garhwal Himalaya), India. Trop Ecol. 1990; 31: 84–97. 72. Ritchie ME, Tilman D, Knops JMH. Herbivore Effects on Plant and Nitrogen Dynamics in Oak Savanna. Ecology. 1998; 79: 177. https://doi.org/10.2307/176872 73. De Mazancourt C, Loreau M, Abbadie L. Grazing optimization and nutrient cycling: When do herbi- vores enhance plant production? Ecology. 1998; 79: 2242–2252. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658 (1998)079[2242:GOANCW]2.0.CO;2

74. Janzen DH. Dispersal of Small Seeds by Big Herbivores: Foliage is the Fruit. Am Nat. 1984; 123: 338– 353. 75. Couvreur M, Christiaen B, Kris V, Martin V. Large herbivores as mobile links between isolated nature reserves through adhesive seed dispersal. Appl Veg Sci. 2004; 7: 229–236. 76. Plue J, Aavik T, Cousins SAO. Grazing networks promote plant functional connectivity among isolated grassland communities. van Kleunen M, editor. Divers Distrib. 2019; 25: 102–115. https://doi.org/10. 1111/ddi.12842 77. Pakeman RJ, Digneffe G, Small JL. Ecological Correlates of Endozoochory by Herbivores. Funct Ecol. 2002; 16: 296–304. 78. Cocyns E, Delporte A, Lens L, Hoffman M. Germination success of temperate grassland species after passage through ungulate and rabbit guts. J Ecol. 2005; 93: 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022- 0477.2005.00982.x 79. Wu G-L, Li X-P, Cheng J-M, Wei X-H, Sun L. Grazing Disturbances Mediate Species Composition of Alpine Meadow Based on Seed Size. Isr J Ecol Evol. 2009; 55: 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1560/ IJEE.55.4.369 PLOS ONE Role of the traditional grazing systems in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem function in alpine Himalaya PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245221 January 7, 2021 17 / 19

80. Carran RA, Ball PR, Theobald PW, Collins MEG. Soil nitrogen balances in urine-affected areas under two moisture regimes in Southland. New Zeal J Exp Agric. 1982; 10: 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 03015521.1982.10427902 81. Steinauer EM, Collins SL. Effects of Urine Deposition on Small-Scale Patch Structure in Prairie Vege- tation. Ecology. 1995; 76: 1195–1205. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940926 82. Liu C, Song X, Wang L, Wang D, Zhou X, Liu J, et al. Effects of grazing on soil nitrogen spatial hetero- geneity depend on herbivore assemblage and pre-grazing plant diversity. Wan S, editor. J Appl Ecol. 2016; 53: 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12537 83. Hamilton EW, Frank DA. Can plants simulate soil microbes and their own nutrient supply? Evidence from a grazing tolerant grass. Ecology. 2001; 82: 2397–2402. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658 (2001)082[2397:CPSSMA]2.0.CO;2 84. Wilson CH, Strickland MS, Hutchings JA, Bianchi TS, Flory SL. Grazing enhances belowground car- bon allocation, microbial biomass, and soil carbon in a subtropical grassland. Glob Chang Biol. 2018; 24: 2997–3009. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14070 PMID: 29377461 85. Pandey CB, Singh JS. Rainfall and Grazing Effects on Net Primary Productivity in a Tropical Savanna, India. Ecology. 1992; 73: 2007–2021. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941451 86. Fay PA, Carlisle JD, Knapp Alan K., Blair JM, Collins SL. Productivity responses to altered rainfall pat- terns in a C4-dominated grassland. Oecologia. 2003; 137: 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442- 003-1331-3 PMID: 12845518

87. Castro SM, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Sato H. Effect of drought on productivity in a Costa Rican tropical dry forest. Environ Res Lett. 2018; 13: 045001. 88. Hector A. The Effect of Diversity on Productivity: Detecting the Role of Species Complementarity. Oikos. 1998; 82: 597. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546380 89. Kelemen A, To¨ro¨ k P, Valko´ O, Dea´k B, To´ th K, To´thme´re´ sz B. Both facilitation and limiting similarity shape the species coexistence in dry alkali grasslands. Ecol Complex. 2015; 21: 34–38. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.ECOCOM.2014.11.004 90. Guerrero-Ramı´rez NR, Craven D, Reich PB, Ewel JJ, Isbell F, Koricheva J, et al. Diversity-dependent temporal divergence of ecosystem functioning in experimental ecosystems. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017; 1: 1639–1642. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0325-1 PMID: 28970481 91. Sonkoly J, Kelemen A, Valko´ O, Dea´ k B, Kiss R, To´ th K, et al. Both mass ratio effects and community diversity drive biomass production in a grassland experiment. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 1848. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41598-018-37190-6 PMID: 30755623 92. Reich PB, Tilman D, Isbell F, Mueller K, Hobbie SE, Flynn DFB, et al. Impacts of Biodiversity Loss Escalate Through Time as Redundancy Fades. Science (80-). 2012; 336: 589 LP– 592. https://doi. org/10.1126/science.1217909 PMID: 22556253 93. Stachowicz JJ. Mutualism, Facilitation, and the Structure of Ecological CommunitiesPositive interac- tions play a critical, but underappreciated, role in ecological communities by reducing physical or biotic

stresses in existing habitats and by creating new habitats on which many species depend. Bioscience. 2001; 51: 235–246. 94. Huston MA. Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of bio- diversity. Oecologia. 1997; 110: 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050180 PMID: 28307235 95. Loreau M. Separating Sampling and Other Effects in Biodiversity Experiments. Oikos. 1998; 82: 600– 602. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546381 96. Li X, Liu Z, Wang Z, Wu X, Li X, Hu J, et al. Pathways of Leymus chinensis Individual Aboveground Biomass Decline in Natural Semiarid Grassland Induced by Overgrazing: A Study at the Plant Func- tional Trait Scale. Wang W, editor. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0124443. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0124443 PMID: 25942588 97. Brundage AL, Petersen WE. A Comparison Between Daily Rotational Grazing and Continuous Graz- ing. J Dairy Sci. 1952; 35: 623–630. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(52)93747-8 98. Teague WR, Dowhower SL. Patch dynamics under rotational and continuous grazing management in large, heterogeneous paddocks. J Arid Environ. 2003; 53: 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1006/JARE. 2002.1036 99. Vecchio MC, Bolaños VA, Golluscio RA, Rodrı´guez AM. Rotational grazing and exclosure improves grassland condition of the halophytic steppe in Flooding Pampa (Argentina) compared with continuous grazing. Rangel J. 2019; 41: 1–12. 100. Jacobo EJ, Rodrı´guez AM, Bartoloni N, Deregibus VA. Rotational Grazing Effects on Rangeland Veg-

etation at a Farm Scale. Rangel Ecol Manag. 2006; 59: 249–257. https://doi.org/10.2111/05-129R1.1 PLOS ONE Role of the traditional grazing systems in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem function in alpine Himalaya PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245221 January 7, 2021 18 / 19

101. Sharma G, Tambe S, Rawat GS, Arrawatia M. Yak Herding and Associated Transboundary Issues in the Sikkim Himalaya, India. Transboundary challenges and opportunities for yak raising in a changing Hindu Kush Himalayan region. Kathmandu, Nepal: ICIMOD; 2016. pp. 93–112. 102. NBSAP. Sikkim State Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan. Gangtok, Sikkim; 2002. http://www. sikkimforest.gov.in/docs/BIODIVERSITY/Sikkim State Biodiversity Action Plan.pdf 103. Lewis M. Cattle and Conservation at Bharatpur: A Case Study in Science and Advocacy. Conserv Soc. 2003; 1: 1–21. 104. Dong SK, Gao HW, Xu GC, Hou XY, Long RJ, Kang MY, et al. Farmer and professional attitudes to the large-scale ban on livestock grazing of grasslands in China. Environ Conserv. 2007; 34: 246–254. 105. Gurung B, Nelson KC, Smith JLD. Impact of Grazing Restrictions on Livestock Composition and Hus- bandry Practices in Madi Valley, Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Environ Conserv. 2009; 36: 338–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892910000160 106. Swiss Federal Office for Agriculture. Swiss Agricultural Policy: Objectives, tools, prospects. Bern, Switzerland; 2004. https://www.cbd.int/financial/pes/swiss-pesagriculturalpolicy.pdf PLOS ONE Role of the traditional grazing systems in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem function in alpine Himalaya PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245221 January 7, 2021 19 / 19