Environmental DNA as a complementary tool for biodiversity monitoring: A multi-technique and multi-trophic approach to investigate cetacean distribution and feeding ecology

population structure in elusive marine species. Royal Society Open Science. 2018; 5(8). https://doi.org/ 10.1098/rsos.180537 PMID: 30225045 PLOS ONE Environmental DNA as a complementary tool for biodiversity monitoring PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300992 October 16, 2024 16 / 20

6. Thomsen PF, Kielgast J, Iversen LL, Møller PR, Rasmussen M, Willerslev E. Detection of a diverse marine fish fauna using environmental DNA from seawater samples. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8). https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041732 PMID: 22952584 7. Miya M, Sato Y, Fukunaga T, Sado T, Poulsen JY, Sato K, et al. MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine spe- cies. R Soc Open Sci. 2015; 2(7):150088. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150088 PMID: 26587265 8. Valsecchi E, Bylemans J, Goodman SJ, Lombardi R, Carr I, Castellano L, et al. Novel universal primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA surveys of marine mammals and other marine vertebrates. Envi- ronmental DNA. 2020; 2(4):460–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.72 9. Ballance LT. Cetacean ecology. Encyclopedia of marine mammals (Third Edition). Academic Press. 2018:172–180. 10. Parsons ECM, Baulch S, Bechshoft T, Bellazzi G, Bouchet P, Cosentino AM, et al. Key research ques- tions of global importance for cetacean conservation. Endangered Species Research. 2015; 27(2):113– 118. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00655 11. Evans PG. Habitat pressures. Encyclopedia of marine mammals (Third Edition). Academic Press. 2018:441–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804327-1.00111–4 12. Suarez-Bregua P, A´ lvarez-Gonza´lez M, Parsons KM, Rotllant J, Pierce GJ, Saavedra C. Environmental DNA (eDNA) for monitoring marine mammals: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Marine Sci- ence. 2022; 9:1886. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.987774

13. Foote AD, Thomsen PF, Sveegaard S, Wahlberg M, Kielgast J, Kyhn LA, et al. Investigating the Poten- tial Use of Environmental DNA (eDNA) for Genetic Monitoring of Marine Mammals. PLoS One. 2012; 7 (8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041781 PMID: 22952587 14. Ma H, Stewart K, Lougheed S, Zheng J, Wang Y, Zhao J. Characterization, optimization, and validation of environmental DNA (eDNA) markers to detect an endangered aquatic mammal. Conservation Genet- ics Resources. 2016; 8:561–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-016-0597-9 15. Baker CS, Steel D, Nieukirk S, Klinck H. Environmental DNA (eDNA) from the wake of the whales: Droplet digital PCR for detection and species identification. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2018; 5:133. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00133 16. Sze´ kely D, Corfixen NL, Mørch LL, Knudsen SW, McCarthy ML, Teilmann J, et al. Environmental DNA captures the genetic diversity of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) in West Greenland. Environ- mental DNA. 2021; 3(1):248–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.176 17. Port JA, O’Donnell JL, Romero-Maraccini OC, Leary PR, Litvin SY, Nickols KJ, et al. Assessing verte- brate biodiversity in a kelp forest ecosystem using environmental DNA. Molecular Ecology. 2016; 25 (2):527–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13481 PMID: 26586544 18. Closek CJ, Santora JA, Starks HA, Schroeder ID, Andruszkiewicz EA, Sakuma KM, et al. Marine Verte- brate Biodiversity and Distribution Within the Central California Current Using Environmental DNA

(eDNA) Metabarcoding and Ecosystem Surveys. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2019; 6. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fmars.2019.00732 19. Sigsgaard EE, Torquato F, Frøslev TG, Moore ABM, Sørensen JM, Range P, et al. Using vertebrate environmental DNA from seawater in biomonitoring of marine habitats. Conservation Biology. 2020; 34:697–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13437 PMID: 31729081 20. Gold Z, Sprague J, Kushner DJ, Zerecero Marin E, Barber PH. eDNA metabarcoding as a biomonitoring tool for marine protected areas. PLoS One. 2021; 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238557 PMID: 33626067 21. Juhel JB, Marques V, Polanco Ferna´ ndez A, Borrero-Pe´ rez GH, Mutis Martinezguerra M, Valentini A, et al. Detection of the elusive Dwarf sperm whale (Kogia sima) using environmental DNA at Malpelo island (Eastern Pacific, Colombia). Ecology and Evolution. 2021; 11(7):2956–2962. https://doi.org/10. 1002/ece3.7057 PMID: 33841757 22. Valsecchi E, Arcangeli A, Lombardi R, Boyse E, Carr IM, Galli P, et al. Ferries and environmental DNA: Underway sampling from commercial vessels provides new opportunities for systematic genetic sur- veys of marine biodiversity. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2021; 8:704786. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars. 2021.704786 23. Alter SE, King CD, Chou E, Chin SC, Rekdahl M, Rosenbaum HC. Using Environmental DNA to Detect Whales and Dolphins in the New York Bight. Frontiers in Conservation Science. 2022; 3. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fcosc.2022.820377 24. Zhang S, Cao Y, Chen B, Jiang P, Fang L, Li H, et al. Assessing the potential use of environmental DNA

25. Lo´ pez A, Pierce GJ, Valeiras X, Santos MB, Guerra A. Distribution patterns of small cetaceans in Gali- cian waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 2004; 84(1):283–294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315404009166h 26. Pierce GJ, Caldas M, Cedeira J, Santos MB, Llavona A´ , Covelo P, et al. Trends in cetacean sightings along the Galician coast, north-west Spain, 2003–2007, and inferences about cetacean habitat prefer- ences. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 2010; 90(8):1547–1560. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315410000664 27. Hammond PS, Macleod K, Berggren P, Borchers DL, Burt L, Cañadas A, et al. Cetacean abundance and distribution in European Atlantic shelf waters to inform conservation and management. Biological Conservation. 2013; 164:107–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.04.010 28. Lambert E, Pierce GJ, Hall K, Brereton T, Dunn TE, Wall D, et al. Cetacean range and climate in the eastern North Atlantic: Future predictions and implications for conservation. Global Change Biology. 2014; 20(6):1782–1793. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12560 PMID: 24677422 29. Correia AM, Tepsich P, Rosso M, Caldeira R, Sousa-Pinto I. Cetacean occurrence and spatial distribu- tion: Habitat modelling for offshore waters in the Portuguese EEZ (NE Atlantic). Journal of Marine Sys- tems. 2015; 143:73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.10.016 30. Hammond PS, Lacey C, Gilles A, Viquerat S, Bo¨ rjesson P, Herr H, et al. Estimates of cetacean abun-

dance in European Atlantic waters in summer 2016 from the SCANS-III aerial and shipboard surveys. Wageningen Marine Research; 2017. 31. Gilles A., Authier M., Ramirez-Martinez N. C., Arau´ jo H., Blanchard A., Carlstrom J., et al. Estimates of cetacean abundance in European Atlantic waters in summer 2022 from the SCANS-IV aerial and ship- board surveys. University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover; 2023. 32. Rogan E, Cañadas A, Macleod K, Santos MB, Mikkelsen B, Uriarte A, et al. Distribution, abundance and habitat use of deep diving cetaceans in the North-East Atlantic. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 2017; 141:8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2017.03.015 33. Correia AM, Gandra M, Liberal M, Valente R, Gil A´ , Rosso M, et al. A dataset of cetacean occurrences in the Eastern North Atlantic. Scientific Data. 2019; 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0187-2 PMID: 31551415 34. Valente R, Correia AM, Gil A´ , Gonzalez Garcia L, Sousa-Pinto I. Baleen whales in Macaronesia: occur- rence patterns revealed through a bibliographic review. Mammal Rev. 2019; 49(2):129–151. https://doi. org/10.1111/mam.12148 35. Vingada J, Eira C. Conservation of Cetaceans and Seabirds in Continental Portugal. The LIFE+ MarPro project. 2017. 36. Mathias ML (coord.), Fonseca C, Rodrigues L, Grilo C, Lopes-Fernandes M, Palmeirim JM, et al: Livro Vermelho dos Mamı´feros em Portugal Continental, 2023;173–207. FCiências.ID, ICNF, Lisboa. 37. Lemos RT, Pires HO. The upwelling regime off the west Portuguese coast, 1941–2000. International

Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 2004; 24(4):511–524. https://doi. org/10.1002/joc.1009 38. Oliveira PB, Nolasco R, Dubert J, Moita T, Peliz A´ . Surface temperature, chlorophyll and advection pat- terns during a summer upwelling event off central Portugal. Continental Shelf Research. 2009; 29(5– 6):759–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2008.08.004 39. Ferreira S, Sousa M, Picado A, Vaz N, Dias JM. New Insights about Upwelling Trends off the Portu- guese Coast: An ERA5 Dataset Analysis. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2022; 10 (12):1849. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10121849 40. Cardoso PG, Dolbeth M, Sousa R, Relvas P, Santos R, Silva A, et al. The Portuguese coast. World Seas: an Environmental Evaluation. Academic Press. 2019:189–208. 41. Guerreiro C, Oliveira A, Rodrigues A. Shelf-break Canyons Versus "Gouf" Canyons: a Comparative Study Based on the Silt-clay Mineralogy of Bottom Sediments from Oporto, Aveiro and Nazare´ Subma- rine Canyons (NW of Portugal). Journal of Coastal Research. 2009:722–726. 42. A´ lvarez-Gonza´lez M, Reascos L, Saavedra C, Suarez-Bregua P. Genetic detection of cetaceans: fine- tuning the technique for environmental DNA analysis. XIII Conference of Spanish Society of Cetaceans; 2022. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27871.88483 43. A´ lvarez-Gonza´lez M, Reascos L, Saavedra C., Pierce GJ, Rotllant J, Suarez-Bregua P. Identification of cetacean species in multi-purpose surveys using environmental DNA metabarcoding and visual moni-

toring. 34th European Cetaceans Society; 2023. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35945. 92009 44. Ralser M, Querfurth R, Warnatz HJ, Lehrach H, Yaspo ML, Krobitsch S. An efficient and economic enhancer mix for PCR. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2006; 347(3):747– 751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.06.151 PMID: 16842759 PLOS ONE Environmental DNA as a complementary tool for biodiversity monitoring PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300992 October 16, 2024 18 / 20

45. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nature methods. 2016; 13(7):581–583. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nmeth.3869 PMID: 27214047 46. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC bioinformatics. 2009; 10:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 PMID: 20003500 47. Wickham H. Data Analysis. In: ggplot2. Use R!. Springer, Cham. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-24277-4_9 48. Picado A, Alvarez I, Vaz N, Varela R, Gomez-Gesteira M, Dias JM. Assessment of chlorophyll variability along the northwestern coast of Iberian Peninsula. J Sea Res. 2014; 93:2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. seares.2014.01.008 49. Mendes R, Saldı´as GS, DeCastro M, Go´ mez-Gesteira M, Vaz N, Dias JM. Seasonal and interannual variability of the Douro turbid river plume, northwestern Iberian Peninsula. Remote Sensing of Environ- ment. 2017; 194:401–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.04.001 50. Dickie IA, Boyer S, Buckley HL, Duncan RP, Gardner PP, Hogg ID, et al. Towards robust and repeat- able sampling methods in eDNA-based studies. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2018; 18(5):940–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12907 PMID: 29802793 51. Jo T, Minamoto T. Complex interactions between environmental DNA (eDNA) state and water chemis- tries on eDNA persistence suggested by meta-analyses. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2021; 21 (5):1490–1503. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13354 PMID: 33580561

52. McCartin LJ, Vohsen SA, Ambrose SW, Layden M, McFadden CS, Cordes EE, et al. Temperature con- trols eDNA persistence across physicochemical conditions in seawater. Environmental Science & Tech- nology. 2022; 56(12):8629–8639. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c01672 PMID: 35658125 53. Lance RF, Klymus KE, Richter CA, Guan X, Farrington HL, Carr MR, et al. Experimental observations on the decay of environmental DNA from bighead and silver carps. Management of Biological Inva- sions. 2017; 8(3). https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2017.8.3.08 54. Joseph C, Faiq ME, Li Z, Chen G. Persistence and degradation dynamics of eDNA affected by environ- mental factors in aquatic ecosystems. Hydrobiologia. 2022; 849(19):4119–4133. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10750-022-04959-w 55. Andruszkiewicz EA, Sassoubre LM, Boehm AB. Persistence of marine fish environmental DNA and the influence of sunlight. PLoS One. 2017; 12(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185043 PMID: 28915253 56. Collins RA, Wangensteen OS, O’Gorman EJ, Mariani S, Sims DW, Genner MJ. Persistence of environ- mental DNA in marine systems. Communications Biology. 2018; 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003- 018-0192-6 PMID: 30417122 57. Burd B, Macdonald T, Bertold S. The effects of wastewater effluent and river discharge on benthic het- erotrophic production, organic biomass and respiration in marine coastal sediments. Marine pollution bulletin. 2013; 74(1):351–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.06.029 PMID: 23838414

58. Qin Q, Shen J. Typical relationships between phytoplankton biomass and transport time in river-domi- nated coastal aquatic systems. Limnology and Oceanography. 2021; 66(8):3209–3220. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/lno.11874 59. Schmidt F, Hinrichs KU, Elvert M. Sources, transport, and partitioning of organic matter at a highly dynamic Continental margin. Mar Chem. 2010; 118(1–2):37–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem. 2009.10.003 60. McGowen MR, Tsagkogeorga G, A´ lvarez-Carretero S, Dos Reis M, Struebig M, Deaville R, et al. Phylo- genomic resolution of the cetacean tree of life using target sequence capture. Systematic Biology. 2020; 69(3):479–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syz068 PMID: 31633766 61. Garcia-Vazquez E, Izquierdo JI, Perez J. Genetic variation at ribosomal genes supports the existence of two different European subspecies in the megrim Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis. Journal of Sea Research. 2006; 56(1):59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2006.04.001 62. Eira C, Ferreira M, Lo´pez A, Sequeira M. Balaenoptera physalus baleia-comum. In: Mathias ML, Fon- seca C, Rodrigues L, Grilo C, Lopes-Fernandes M, Palmeirim JM, Santos-Reis M, Alves PC, Cabral JA, Ferreira M, Mira A, Eira C, Negroˆes N, Paupe´rio J, Pita R, Rainho A, Rosalino LM, Tapisso JT, Vingada J, editors. Livro Vermelho dos Mamı´feros em Portugal Continental. FCiências.ID, ICNF, Lisboa; 2023. 63. Spyrakos E, Santos-Diniz TC, Martinez-Iglesias G, Torres-Palenzuela JM, Pierce GJ. Spatiotemporal patterns of marine mammal distribution in coastal waters of Galicia, NW Spain. Hydrobiologia. 2011;

670:87–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-011-0722-4 64. Lo´ pez B. D., & Methion S. (2019). Habitat drivers of endangered rorqual whales in a highly impacted upwelling region. Ecological Indicators, 103, 610–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.038. PLOS ONE Environmental DNA as a complementary tool for biodiversity monitoring PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300992 October 16, 2024 19 / 20

65. Morato T, Hoyle SD, Allain V, Nicol SJ. Seamounts are hotspots of pelagic biodiversity in the open ocean. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010; 107(21):9707–9711. https://doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.0910290107 PMID: 20448197 66. Galice G. The Continental margin off Galicia and Portugal: acoustical stratigraphy, dredge stratigraphy and structural evolution. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 1979; 47(2):633–662. 67. Gil A´ , Correia AM, Sousa-Pinto I. Records of harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in the mouth of the Douro River (northern Portugal) with presence of an anomalous white individual. Marine Biodiversity Records. 2019; 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41200-018-0160-3 68. Ferna´ ndez R, MacLeod CD, Pierce GJ, Covelo P, Lo´ pez A, Torres-Palenzuela J, et al. Inter-specific and seasonal comparison of the niches occupied by small cetaceans off north-west Iberia. Continental Shelf Research. 2013; 64:88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2013.05.008 69. Torres-Pereira A, Ferreira M, Eira C, Lo´pez A, Sequeira M. Phocoena phocoena boto. In: Mathias ML, Fonseca C, Rodrigues L, Grilo C, Lopes-Fernandes M, Palmeirim JM, et al., editors. Livro Vermelho dos Mamı´feros em Portugal Continental. FCiências.ID, ICNF, Lisboa; 2023. 70. Miya M, Gotoh RO, Sado T. MiFish metabarcoding: a high-throughput approach for simultaneous detection of multiple fish species from environmental DNA and other samples. Fisheries Science. 2020; 86(6):939–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-020-01461-8

71. Rojahn J, Gleeson DM, Furlan E, Haeusler T, Bylemans J. Improving the detection of rare native fish species in environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys. Aquatic Conservation. 2021; 31(4):990–997. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3514 72. Visser F, Merten VJ, Bayer T, Oudejans MG, De Jonge DSW, Puebla O, et al. Deep-sea predator niche segregation revealed by combined cetacean biologging and eDNA analysis of cephalopod prey. Sci Adv. 2021; 7(14):eabi5784. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf5908 PMID: 33789903 73. Santos MB, Saavedra C, Pierce GJ. Quantifying the predation on sardine and hake by cetaceans in the Atlantic waters of the Iberian peninsula. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. 2014; 106:232–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.09.040 74. Marc¸alo A, Nicolau L, Gime´ nez J, Ferreira M, Santos J, Arau´ jo H, et al. Feeding ecology of the common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) in Western Iberian waters: has the decline in sardine (Sardina pilchardus) affected dolphin diet? Marine Biology. 2018; 165:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-018-3285-3 75. De Pierrepont JF, Dubois B, Desormonts S, Santos MB, Robin JP. Stomach contents of English Chan- nel cetaceans stranded on the coast of Normandy. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 2005; 85(6):1539–1546. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315405012762 76. Spitz J, Chouvelon T, Cardinaud M, Kostecki C, Lorance P. Prey preferences of adult sea bass Dicen- trarchus labrax in the northeastern Atlantic: implications for bycatch of common dolphin Delphinus del-

phis. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2013; 70(2):452–461. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fss200 77. Monteiro PV. The purse seine fishing of sardine in Portuguese waters: a difficult compromise between fish stock sustainability and fishing effort. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture. 2017; 25 (3):218–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2016.1269720 78. Wise L, Silva A, Ferreira M, Silva MA, Sequeira M. Interactions between small cetaceans and the purse-seine fishery in western Portuguese waters. Scientia Marina. 2007; 71(2):405–412. https://doi. org/10.3989/scimar.2007.71n2405 79. Marc¸alo A, Katara I, Feijo´ D, Arau´jo H, Oliveira I, Santos J, et al. Quantification of interactions between the Portuguese sardine purse-seine fishery and cetaceans. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2015; 72 (8):2438–2449. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv076 80. Santos MB, Pierce GJ. The diet of harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in the northeast Atlantic. Oceanography and Marine Biology. 2003; 41:355–390. 81. Me´heust E, Alfonsi E, Le Me´ nec P, Hassani S, Jung JL. DNA barcoding for the identification of soft remains of prey in the stomach contents of grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) and harbor porpoises (Pho- coena phocoena). Marine Biology Research. 2015; 11(4):385–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000. 2014.943240 82. Gime´ nez J, Marc¸alo A, Ramı´rez F, Verborgh P, Gauffier P, Esteban R, et al. Diet of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) from the Gulf of Cadiz: Insights from stomach content and stable isotope analyses.

PLoS One. 2017; 12(9):e0184673. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184673 PMID: 28898268 PLOS ONE Environmental DNA as a complementary tool for biodiversity monitoring PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300992 October 16, 2024 20 / 20