Environmental DNA as a complementary tool for biodiversity monitoring: A multi-technique and multi-trophic approach to investigate cetacean distribution and feeding ecology

45. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nature methods. 2016; 13(7):581–583. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nmeth.3869 PMID: 27214047 46. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC bioinformatics. 2009; 10:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 PMID: 20003500 47. Wickham H. Data Analysis. In: ggplot2. Use R!. Springer, Cham. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-24277-4_9 48. Picado A, Alvarez I, Vaz N, Varela R, Gomez-Gesteira M, Dias JM. Assessment of chlorophyll variability along the northwestern coast of Iberian Peninsula. J Sea Res. 2014; 93:2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. seares.2014.01.008 49. Mendes R, Saldı´as GS, DeCastro M, Go´ mez-Gesteira M, Vaz N, Dias JM. Seasonal and interannual variability of the Douro turbid river plume, northwestern Iberian Peninsula. Remote Sensing of Environ- ment. 2017; 194:401–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.04.001 50. Dickie IA, Boyer S, Buckley HL, Duncan RP, Gardner PP, Hogg ID, et al. Towards robust and repeat- able sampling methods in eDNA-based studies. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2018; 18(5):940–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12907 PMID: 29802793 51. Jo T, Minamoto T. Complex interactions between environmental DNA (eDNA) state and water chemis- tries on eDNA persistence suggested by meta-analyses. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2021; 21 (5):1490–1503. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13354 PMID: 33580561

52. McCartin LJ, Vohsen SA, Ambrose SW, Layden M, McFadden CS, Cordes EE, et al. Temperature con- trols eDNA persistence across physicochemical conditions in seawater. Environmental Science & Tech- nology. 2022; 56(12):8629–8639. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c01672 PMID: 35658125 53. Lance RF, Klymus KE, Richter CA, Guan X, Farrington HL, Carr MR, et al. Experimental observations on the decay of environmental DNA from bighead and silver carps. Management of Biological Inva- sions. 2017; 8(3). https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2017.8.3.08 54. Joseph C, Faiq ME, Li Z, Chen G. Persistence and degradation dynamics of eDNA affected by environ- mental factors in aquatic ecosystems. Hydrobiologia. 2022; 849(19):4119–4133. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10750-022-04959-w 55. Andruszkiewicz EA, Sassoubre LM, Boehm AB. Persistence of marine fish environmental DNA and the influence of sunlight. PLoS One. 2017; 12(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185043 PMID: 28915253 56. Collins RA, Wangensteen OS, O’Gorman EJ, Mariani S, Sims DW, Genner MJ. Persistence of environ- mental DNA in marine systems. Communications Biology. 2018; 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003- 018-0192-6 PMID: 30417122 57. Burd B, Macdonald T, Bertold S. The effects of wastewater effluent and river discharge on benthic het- erotrophic production, organic biomass and respiration in marine coastal sediments. Marine pollution bulletin. 2013; 74(1):351–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.06.029 PMID: 23838414

58. Qin Q, Shen J. Typical relationships between phytoplankton biomass and transport time in river-domi- nated coastal aquatic systems. Limnology and Oceanography. 2021; 66(8):3209–3220. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/lno.11874 59. Schmidt F, Hinrichs KU, Elvert M. Sources, transport, and partitioning of organic matter at a highly dynamic Continental margin. Mar Chem. 2010; 118(1–2):37–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem. 2009.10.003 60. McGowen MR, Tsagkogeorga G, A´ lvarez-Carretero S, Dos Reis M, Struebig M, Deaville R, et al. Phylo- genomic resolution of the cetacean tree of life using target sequence capture. Systematic Biology. 2020; 69(3):479–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syz068 PMID: 31633766 61. Garcia-Vazquez E, Izquierdo JI, Perez J. Genetic variation at ribosomal genes supports the existence of two different European subspecies in the megrim Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis. Journal of Sea Research. 2006; 56(1):59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2006.04.001 62. Eira C, Ferreira M, Lo´pez A, Sequeira M. Balaenoptera physalus baleia-comum. In: Mathias ML, Fon- seca C, Rodrigues L, Grilo C, Lopes-Fernandes M, Palmeirim JM, Santos-Reis M, Alves PC, Cabral JA, Ferreira M, Mira A, Eira C, Negroˆes N, Paupe´rio J, Pita R, Rainho A, Rosalino LM, Tapisso JT, Vingada J, editors. Livro Vermelho dos Mamı´feros em Portugal Continental. FCiências.ID, ICNF, Lisboa; 2023. 63. Spyrakos E, Santos-Diniz TC, Martinez-Iglesias G, Torres-Palenzuela JM, Pierce GJ. Spatiotemporal patterns of marine mammal distribution in coastal waters of Galicia, NW Spain. Hydrobiologia. 2011;

670:87–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-011-0722-4 64. Lo´ pez B. D., & Methion S. (2019). Habitat drivers of endangered rorqual whales in a highly impacted upwelling region. Ecological Indicators, 103, 610–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.038. PLOS ONE Environmental DNA as a complementary tool for biodiversity monitoring PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300992 October 16, 2024 19 / 20