The Five Canadas of Climate Change: Using audience segmentation to inform communication on climate policy

58. Klok J, Larsen A, Dahl A, Hansen K. Ecological Tax Reform in Denmark: history and social acceptabil- ity. Energy Policy 2006:12. 59. Clinch JP, Dunne L. Environmental tax reform: an assessment of social responses in Ireland. Energy Policy 2006:10. 60. Dresner S, Jackson T, Gilbert N. History and social responses to environmental tax reform in the United Kingdom. Energy Policy 2006:10. 61. Carattini S, Kallbekken S, Orlov A. How to win public support for a global carbon tax. Nature 2019; 565:289–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00124-x PMID: 30651626 62. Rhodes E, Axsen J, Jaccard M. Does effective climate policy require well-informed citizen support? Glob Environ Change 2014; 29:92–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.001. 63. Gollust SE, Niederdeppe J, Barry CL. Framing the Consequences of Childhood Obesity to Increase Public Support for Obesity Prevention Policy. Am J Public Health 2013; 103:e96–102. https://doi.org/ 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301271 PMID: 24028237 64. Hurwitz J, Peffley M. Playing the Race Card in the Post-Willie Horton Era: The Impact of Racialized Code Words on Support for Punitive Crime Policy. Public Opin Q 2005; 69:99–112. https://doi.org/10. 1093/poq/nfi004. 65. Leeper JT, and Slothuus R. How the News Media Persuades: Framing Effects and Beyond. The Oxf Handbook of Electoral Persuasion 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190860806.013.4 66. Amsalem E, Zoizner A. Real, but Limited: A Meta-Analytic Assessment of Framing Effects in the Politi-

cal Domain. Br J Polit Sci 2020; 52:221–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000253 67. Keeter S, Kennedy C, Dimock M, Best J, Craighill P. Gauging the Impact of Growing Nonresponse on Estimates from a National RDD Telephone Survey. Public Opin Q 2006; 70:759–79. https://doi.org/10. 1093/poq/nfl035. 68. Chryst B, Marlon J, van der Linden S, Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C. Global Warming’s “Six Americas Short Survey”: Audience Segmentation of Climate Change Views Using a Four Question Instrument. Environ Commun 2018; 12:1109–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1508047. 69. Nylund-Gibson K, Choi AY. Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis. Transl Issues Psychol Sci 2018; 4:440–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000176. 70. Wasserman L. Bayesian Model Selection and Model Averaging. J Math Psychol 2000; 44:92–107. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1999.1278 PMID: 10733859 71. Mutz DC. Population-Based Survey Experiment. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 2011. 72. Dunlap RE, Xiao C, McCright AM. Politics and Environment in America: Partisan and Ideological Cleav- ages in Public Support for Environmentalism. Environ Polit 2001; 10:23–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 714000580. 73. Krosnick JA, Holbrook AL, Lowe L, Visser PS. The Origins and Consequences of democratic citizens’ Policy Agendas: A Study of Popular Concern about Global Warming. Clim Change 2006; 77:7–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9068-8. 74. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for

the social, behavioural, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39:175–91. https://doi.org/ 10.3758/BF03193146. 75. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. Second Edition. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988. 76. “Topline Results”. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC (November 5, 2015) https://www. pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/11/Pew-Research-Center-Climate-Change-Report- FINAL-TOPLINE-FOR-RELEASE-November-5-2015.pdf 77. Mildenberger M, Lachapelle E, Harrison K, Stadelmann-Steffen I. Limited impacts of carbon tax rebate programmes on public support for carbon pricing. Nat Clim Change 2022; 12:141–7. https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41558-021-01268-3. 78. Zaller JR. The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1992. 79. Chong D, Druckman JN. Counterframing Effects. J Polit 2013; 75:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0022381612000837. 80. Zhou J. Boomerangs versus Javelins: How Polarization Constrains Communication on Climate Change. Environ Polit 2016; 25:788–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1166602. 81. Golberg M, Gustafson A, Rosenthal S, Kotcher J,Maibach E, and Leiserowitz A. For the first time, the Alarmed are now the largest of Global Warming’s Six Americas. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, 2020. PLOS ONE The Five Canadas of Climate Change PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273977 November 23, 2022 21 / 21