Thông tin tài nguyên

The Five Canadas of Climate Change: Using audience segmentation to inform communication on climate policy

pmc-PMC9683580.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 21 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 19 · Đoạn 53Vị trí nguồn

11. Scheufele DA. Beyond the Choir? The Need to Understand Multiple Publics for Science. Environ Com- mun 2018; 12:1123–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1521543. 12. Hine DW, Reser JP, Morrison M, Phillips WJ, Nunn P, Cooksey R. Audience segmentation and climate change communication: conceptual and methodological considerations: Audience segmentation and climate change communication. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 2014; 5:441–59. https://doi.org/10. 1002/wcc.279. 13. Hine DW, Phillips WJ, Driver AB, Morrison M. Audience Segmentation and Climate Change Communi- cation. Oxf Res Encycl Clim Sci 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.390. 14. Hine DW, Phillips WJ, Cooksey R, Reser JP, Nunn P, Marks ADG, et al. Preaching to different choirs: How to motivate dismissive, uncommitted, and alarmed audiences to adapt to climate change? Glob Environ Change 2016; 36:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.002. 15. Maibach EW, Leiserowitz A, Roser-Renouf C, Mertz CK. Identifying Like-Minded Audiences for Global Warming Public Engagement Campaigns: An Audience Segmentation Analysis and Tool Development. PLoS ONE 2011; 6:e17571. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017571 PMID: 21423743 16. Metag J, Fu¨ chslin T, Scha¨fer MS. Global Warming’s Five Germanys: A Typology of Germans’ Views on Climate Change and Patterns of Media Use and Information. Pub Und of Sci 2017; 26:434–51. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0963662515592558 PMID: 26142148 17. Heath Y, Gifford R. Free-Market Ideology and Environmental Degradation: The Case of Belief in Global

Trang 19 · Đoạn 54Vị trí nguồn

Climate Change. Environ Behav 2006; 38:48–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505277998. 18. Lachapelle E, Borick CP, Rabe B. Public Attitudes toward Climate Science and Climate Policy in Fed- eral Systems: Canada and the United States Compared1: Public Attitudes toward Climate Science and Climate Policy in Federal Systems. Rev Policy Res 2012; 29:334–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541- 1338.2012.00563.x. 19. Mildenberger M, Howe P, Lachapelle E, Stokes L, Jennifer M, Gravelle T. The Distribution of Climate Change Public Opinion in Canada. PLoS ONE 2016. 11: e0159774. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0159774 PMID: 27486659 20. Rhodes E, Axsen J, Jaccard M. Exploring Citizen Support for Different Types of Climate Policy. Ecol Econ 2017; 137:56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.027. 21. Donald J, Axsen J, Shaw K, Robertson B. Sun, wind or water? Public support for large-scale renewable energy development in Canada. J of Environ Policy & Planning 2021;1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 1523908X.2021.2000375 22. Lachapelle E, Morin-Chasse´ A, Nadeau R. Framing the Energy East pipeline debate in Canada: Public opinion is sensitive to public safety and economic considerations. Energy Res Soc Sci 2021; 77:102091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102091. 23. Corner A, Randall A. Selling climate change? The limitations of social marketing as a strategy for cli- mate change public engagement. Glob Environ Change 2011; 21:1005–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2011.05.002.

Trang 19 · Đoạn 55Vị trí nguồn

24. Leiserowitz A, Thaker J, Feinberg G, Cooper DK. Global Warming’s Six Indias. Yale University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication; 2013. 25. Morrison M, Duncan R, Sherley C, Parton K. A comparison between attitudes to climate change in Aus- tralia and the United States. Australas J Environ Manag 2013; 20:87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14486563.2012.762946. 26. Hine DW, Reser JP, Phillips WJ, Cooksey R, Marks ADG, Nunn P, et al. Identifying climate change interpretive communities in a large Australian sample. J Environ Psychol 2013; 36:229–39. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.08.006. 27. Detenber BH. Audience Segmentation for Campaign Design: Addressing Climate Change in Singapore. Intern J Commun 2016; 10:4736–4758. 28. Wonneberger A, Meijers MHC, Schuck ART. Shifting public engagement: How media coverage of cli- mate change conferences affects climate change audience segments. Public Underst Sci 2019; 29:176–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519886474 PMID: 31709905 29. Thaker J. Climate change in the Kiwi mind: Audience segmentation analysis. Wellington, New Zealand: Massey University, 2021. 30. Hefner D. Wie kriegen wir sie ins Boot?”Eine Typologie zur Entwicklung von Kommunikationsstrategien zur Fo¨ rderung umweltschu¨ tzenden Verhaltens. Medien Kommun 2013; 61:387–405. https://doi.org/10. 5771/1615-634x-2013-3-387. 31. Bernstein J, Szuster B. Beyond Unidimensionality: Segmenting Contemporary Pro-Environmental Worldviews Through Surveys and Repertory Grid Analysis. Environ Commun 2018; 12:1062–76.

Trang 19 · Đoạn 56Vị trí nguồn

https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1504809. PLOS ONE The Five Canadas of Climate Change PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273977 November 23, 2022 19 / 21