Climate change, geography and trade agreements: A perspective of Asian bilateral trade

PLOS One | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320363 April 25, 2025 21 / 23 PLOS One Trade agreement, climate change and geography 40. Atsumi T. International. trade and domestic economic geography: the case of the port openings of Japan. 1859. Available from: http://www.etsg.org/ETSG2008/Papers/Atsumi.pdf 41. Dou Y, Zhao J, Malik MN, Dong K. Assessing the impact of trade openness on CO2 emissions: Evidence from China-Japan-ROK FTA countries. J Environ Manage. 2021;296:113241. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113241 PMID: 34265664 42. https://doi.org/Hasanov FJ, Khan Z, Hussain M, Tufail M. Theoretical framework for the carbon emis- sions effects of technological progress and renewable energy consumption. Sustainable Develop- ment. 2021;29(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2175 43. Zhang S, Liu X, Bae J. Does trade openness affect CO2 emissions: evidence from ten newly industri- alized countries?. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017;24(21):17616–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356- 017-9392-8 PMID: 28597097 44. Jun W, Mahmood H, Zakaria M. Impact of trade openness on environment in China. Journal of Busi- ness Economics and Management. 2020;21(4):1185–202. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.12050 45. Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Ahmed K, Hammoudeh S. Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: The importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Economics. 2017;61:221– 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.008 46. Dong Y, Ishikawa M, Liu X, Wang C. An analysis of the driving forces of CO2 emissions embodied in

Japan–China trade. Energy Policy. 2010;38:6784–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.050 47. Gozgor G. Does trade matter for carbon emissions in OECD countries? Evidence from a new trade openness measure. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017;24(36):27813–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356- 017-0361-z PMID: 28986721 48. Shahbaz M, Kumar Tiwari A, Nasir M. The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy. 2013;61:1452–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.006 49. Mahmood H, Maalel N, Zarrad O. Trade openness and CO2 emissions: evidence from Tunisia. Sus- tain. 2019;11:3295. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123295 50. Managi S, Hibiki A, Tsurumi T. Does trade openness improve environmental quality?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 2009;58(3):346–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jeem.2009.04.008 51. Koc S, Bulus GC. Testing validity of the EKC hypothesis in South Korea: role of renewable energy and trade openness. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020;27(23):29043–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356- 020-09172-7 PMID: 32424750 52. Ali S, Dogan E, Chen F, Khan Z. International trade and environmental performance in top ten‐emit- ters countries: The role of eco‐innovation and renewable energy consumption. Sustainable Develop- ment. 2020;29(2):378–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2153 53. https://doi.org/Hasanov FJ, Liddle B, Mikayilov JI. The impact of international trade on CO2 emis-

sions in oil exporting countries: territory vs consumption emissions accounting. Energy Economics. 2018;74:343–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.004 54. Liddle B. Consumption-based accounting and the trade-carbon emissions nexus. Energy Economics. 2018;69:71–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.11.004 55. Liddle B. Consumption-based accounting and the trade-carbon emissions nexus in Asia: a hetero- geneous, common factor panel analysis. Sustainability. 2018;10(n/a):3627. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su10103627 56. Liu N, Author2 F, Author3 F. The potential economic viability of using the Northern Sea Route (NSR) as an alternative route between Asia and Europe. Journal of Transport Geography. 2010;18:434–44. 57. Bing ZUO, Gang WU, Zhang SN, Runji LIN, Junyao YIN, Haowei DAI, et al. Research on the impacts of trade agreements on global trade flows: Based on complex network perspective. World Regional Studies. 2024;33(1):1. 58. Khan H, Chen Y, Lv L. Does the China–Pakistan free trade agreement benefit the vegetable exports of Pakistan? A gravity estimation. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2024;8:1362910. 59. Makun K, Singh B. Trade deregulation and fiscal revenue in selected Pacific Island countries. PLoS One. 2025;20(1):e0315733. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315733 PMID: 39746107 60. Hahn M. The framework of bilateral trade agreements. In The Australia-European Union Free Trade Agreement. Springer, Cham. 2022; p. 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91448-63

61. Falvey R, Foster-McGregor N. The breadth of preferential trade agreements and the mar- gins of exports. Review of World Economics. 2022;158(1):181–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10290-021-00430-5