Mapping climate adaptation corridors for biodiversity—A regional-scale case study in Central America

Data curation: Ian M. McCullough, Christopher Beirne. Formal analysis: Ian M. McCullough, Christopher Beirne. Funding acquisition: Andrew Whitworth. Investigation: Ian M. McCullough, Christopher Beirne, Andrew Whitworth. Methodology: Ian M. McCullough, Christopher Beirne, Carolina Soto-Navarro, Andrew Whitworth. Project administration: Ian M. McCullough, Christopher Beirne, Carolina Soto-Navarro, Andrew Whitworth. Resources: Ian M. McCullough, Christopher Beirne, Andrew Whitworth. Software: Ian M. McCullough, Christopher Beirne. Supervision: Ian M. McCullough, Christopher Beirne, Andrew Whitworth. Validation: Ian M. McCullough, Christopher Beirne. Visualization: Ian M. McCullough, Christopher Beirne. Writing – original draft: Ian M. McCullough, Christopher Beirne, Carolina Soto-Navarro, Andrew Whitworth. Writing – review & editing: Ian M. McCullough, Christopher Beirne, Carolina Soto-Navarro, Andrew Whitworth. References 1. Beier P, Noss RF. Do habitat corridors provide connectivity?. Conservation Biology. 1998 Dec; 12 (6):1241–52. 2. Heller NE, Zavaleta ES. Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: a review of 22 years of recommendations. Biological conservation. 2009 Jan 1; 142(1):14–32. 3. Costanza JK, Terando AJ. Landscape connectivity planning for adaptation to future climate and land- use change. Current Landscape Ecology Reports. 2019 Mar; 4:1–3. 4. Littlefield CE, Krosby M, Michalak JL, Lawler JJ. Connectivity for species on the move: supporting cli- mate-driven range shifts. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2019 Jun; 17(5):270–8.

5. Hilty J, Worboys GL, Keeley A, Woodley S, Lausche B, Locke H, et al. 2020. Guidelines for conserving connectivity through ecological networks and corridors. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 30. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. 6. McGuire JL, Lawler JJ, McRae BH, Nuñez TA, Theobald DM. Achieving climate connectivity in a frag- mented landscape. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016 Jun 28; 113(26):7195– 200. 7. Malakoutikhah S, Fakheran S, Hemami MR, Tarkesh M, Senn J. Assessing future distribution, suitabil- ity of corridors and efficiency of protected areas to conserve vulnerable ungulates under climate change. Diversity and Distributions. 2020 Oct; 26(10):1383–96. 8. Stralberg D, Carroll C, Nielsen SE. Toward a climate-informed North American protected areas net- work: Incorporating climate-change refugia and corridors in conservation planning. Conservation Let- ters. 2020 Jul; 13(4):e12712. 9. Dobrowski SZ. A climatic basis for microrefugia: the influence of terrain on climate. Global change biol- ogy. 2011 Feb; 17(2):1022–35. 10. Gracanin A, Mikac KM. Evaluating modelled wildlife corridors for the movement of multiple arboreal species in a fragmented landscape. Landscape Ecology. 2023 May; 38(5):1321–37. 11. Bosso L, Panzuto R, Balestrieri R, Smeraldo S, Chiusano ML, Raffini F, et al. Integrating citizen science and spatial ecology to inform management and conservation of the Italian seahorses. Ecological Infor- matics. 2024 Mar 1; 79:102402. PLOS ONE Mapping climate adaptation corridors for biodiversity

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304756 May 31, 2024 16 / 19

12. Michalak JL, Lawler JJ, Roberts DR, Carroll C. Distribution and protection of climatic refugia in North America. Conservation Biology. 2018 Dec; 32(6):1414–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13130 PMID: 29744936 13. Morelli TL, Barrows CW, Ramirez AR, Cartwright JM, Ackerly DD, Eaves TD, et al. Climate-change refugia: Biodiversity in the slow lane. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2020 Jun; 18(5):228– 34. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2189 PMID: 33424494 14. Trew BT, Maclean IM. Vulnerability of global biodiversity hotspots to climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2021 Apr; 30(4):768–83. 15. Doxa A, Kamarianakis Y, Mazaris AD. Spatial heterogeneity and temporal stability characterize future climatic refugia in Mediterranean Europe. Global Change Biology. 2022 Apr; 28(7):2413–24. https://doi. org/10.1111/gcb.16072 PMID: 34981617 16. Saura S, Bertzky B, Bastin L, Battistella L, Mandrici A, Dubois G. Protected area connectivity: Shortfalls in global targets and country-level priorities. Biological Conservation. 2018 Mar 1; 219:53–67. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.020 PMID: 29503460 17. Saura S, Bertzky B, Bastin L, Battistella L, Mandrici A, Dubois G. Global trends in protected area con- nectivity from 2010 to 2018. Biological Conservation. 2019 Oct 1; 238:108183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. biocon.2019.07.028 PMID: 31885400 18. Senior RA, Hill JK, Edwards DP. Global loss of climate connectivity in tropical forests. Nature Climate Change. 2019 Aug; 9(8):623–6.

19. UNEP-WCMC, IUCN and NGS. 2020. Protected Planet Report 2020. UNEP-WCMC, IUCN and NGS: Cambridge UK; Gland, Switzerland; and Washington, D.C., USA. 20. CBD. 2022. Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. CBD/COP/DEC/15/4. 21. DeClerck FA, Chazdon R, Holl KD, Milder JC, Finegan B, Martinez-Salinas A, et al. Biodiversity conser- vation in human-modified landscapes of Mesoamerica: Past, present and future. Biological conserva- tion. 2010 Oct 1; 143(10):2301–13. 22. A´ lvarez Malvido M, La´ zaro C, De Lamo X, Juffe-Bignoli D, Cao R, Bueno P, et al. (Editores). 2021. Latin America and the Caribbean Protected Planet Report 2020. Mexico City, Mexico; Cambridge UK; Gland, Switzerland; Bogota, Colombia: Red-Parques, UNEP-WCMC, WCPA-IUCN, WWF, CONANP and IAPA Project. 23. Holland MB. Mesoamerican biological corridor. Climate and conservation: Landscape and seascape science, planning, and action. 2012:56–66. 24. Crespin SJ, Garcı´a-Villalta JE. Integration of land-sharing and land-sparing conservation strategies through regional networking: the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor as a lifeline for carnivores in El Sal- vador. Ambio. 2014 Oct; 43:820–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0470-y PMID: 24375401 25. Patel R. Paper plans and possibility: A critical analysis of landscape conservation policy in the Meso- american Biological Corridor. Environmental Development. 2021 Mar 1; 37:100600. 26. Herna´ndez AC, Ortega-Argueta A, Campillo LM, Bello-Baltazar E, Nieto RR. Effectiveness of manage-

ment of the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor in Mexico. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2022 Oct 1; 226:104504. 27. Hofman MP, Hayward MW, Kelly MJ, Balkenhol N. Enhancing conservation network design with graph- theory and a measure of protected area effectiveness: Refining wildlife corridors in Belize, Central America. Landscape and urban planning. 2018 Oct 1; 178:51–9. 28. Moran MD, Monroe A, Stallcup L. A proposal for practical and effective biological corridors to connect protected areas in northwest Costa Rica. Nature Conservation. 2019 Dec 9; 36:113–37. 29. Meyer NF, Moreno R, Reyna-Hurtado R, Signer J, Balkenhol N. Towards the restoration of the Meso- american Biological Corridor for large mammals in Panama: comparing multi-species occupancy to movement models. Movement ecology. 2020 Dec; 8(1):1–4. 30. Rabinowitz A, Zeller KA. A range-wide model of landscape connectivity and conservation for the jaguar, Panthera onca. Biological conservation. 2010 Apr 1; 143(4):939–45. 31. Petracca LS, Herna´ ndez-Potosme S, Obando-Sampson L, Salom-Pe´rez R, Quigley H, Robinson HS. Agricultural encroachment and lack of enforcement threaten connectivity of range-wide jaguar (Panthera onca) corridor. Journal for Nature Conservation. 2014 Oct 1; 22(5):436–44. 32. Wultsch C, Caragiulo A, Dias-Freedman I, Quigley H, Rabinowitz S, Amato G. Genetic diversity and population structure of Mesoamerican jaguars (Panthera onca): implications for conservation and man- agement. PloS one. 2016 Oct 26; 11(10):e0162377. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162377 PMID: 27783617

33. de la Torre JA, Nu´ ñez JM, Medellı´n RA. Habitat availability and connectivity for jaguars (Panthera onca) in the Southern Mayan Forest: Conservation priorities for a fragmented landscape. Biological conserva- tion. 2017 Feb 1; 206:270–82. PLOS ONE Mapping climate adaptation corridors for biodiversity PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304756 May 31, 2024 17 / 19

34. Salom-Pe´ rez R, Corrales-Gutie´rrez D, Araya-Gamboa D, Espinoza-Muñoz D, Finegan B, Petracca LS. Forest cover mediates large and medium-sized mammal occurrence in a critical link of the Mesoameri- can Biological Corridor. PLoS one. 2021 Mar 23; 16(3):e0249072. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0249072 PMID: 33755706 35. Beita CM, Murillo LF, Alvarado LD. Ecological corridors in Costa Rica: An evaluation applying land- scape structure, fragmentation-connectivity process, and climate adaptation. Conservation Science and Practice. 2021 Aug; 3(8):e475. 36. Fung E, Imbach P, Corrales L, Vilchez S, Zamora N, Argotty F, et al. Mapping conservation priorities and connectivity pathways under climate change for tropical ecosystems. Climatic Change. 2017 Mar; 141:77–92. 37. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. 2023. Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA), June 2023, Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. Available at: www.protectedplanet.net. 38. Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, Ilyushchenko S, Thau D, Moore R. Google Earth Engine: Planetary- scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote sensing of Environment. 2017 Dec 1; 202:18–27. 39. Aybar C. 2023. rgee: R Bindings for Calling the ’Earth Engine’ API. https://github.com/r-spatial/rgee/, https://r-spatial.github.io/rgee/, https://github.com/google/earthengine-api/. 40. McCullough I, Beirne C. Central America climate adaptation corridor analysis. Zenodo; 2024. https:// doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11150568 41. R Core Team. 2023. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Sta-

tistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. <https://www.R-project.org/>. 42. Hanson JO. Wdpar: Interface to the world database on protected areas. Journal of Open Source Soft- ware. 2022 Oct 25; 7(78):4594. 43. Jarvis A, Reuter HI, Nelson A, Guevara E. 2008. Hole-filled SRTM for the globe Version 4, available from the CGIAR-CSI SRTM 90m Database: https://srtm.csi.cgiar.org. 44. Doumenge C, Gilmour D, Pe´rez MR, Blockhus J. Tropical montane cloud forests: conservation status and management issues. InTropical montane cloud forests 1995 (pp. 24–37). New York, NY: Springer US. 45. Quesada CA, Phillips OL, Schwarz M, Czimczik CI, Baker TR, Patiño S, et al. Basin-wide variations in Amazon forest structure and function are mediated by both soils and climate. Biogeosciences. 2012 Jun 22; 9(6):2203–46. 46. Pebesma EJ. Simple features for R: standardized support for spatial vector data. R J.. 2018 Jul 1; 10 (1):439. 47. Grantham HS, Duncan A, Evans TD, Jones KR, Beyer HL, Schuster R, et al. Anthropogenic modifica- tion of forests means only 40% of remaining forests have high ecosystem integrity. Nature communica- tions. 2020 Dec 8; 11(1):5978. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19493-3 PMID: 33293507 48. Zanaga D, Van De Kerchove R, De Keersmaecker W, Souverijns N, Brockmann C, Quast R. et al. 2021. ESA WorldCover 10 m 2020 v100. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5571936 49. de la Torre JA, Rivero M, Camacho G, A´ lvarez-Ma´ rquez LA. Assessing occupancy and habitat connec- tivity for Baird’s tapir to establish conservation priorities in the Sierra Madre de Chiapas, Mexico. Journal

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304756 May 31, 2024 18 / 19

56. van Etten J. 2017. “R Package gdistance: Distances and Routes on Geographical Grids.” Journal of Statistical Software, 76(13), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v076.i13 <https://doi.org/10.18637/jss. v076.i13>. 57. Hijmans R. 2023. terra: Spatial Data Analysis. R package version 1.7–29, <https://CRAN.R-project.org/ package=terra>. 58. Beier P. A rule of thumb for widths of conservation corridors. Conservation Biology. 2019 Aug; 33 (4):976–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13256 PMID: 30569451 59. Kassambara A. 2023. rstatix: Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests. R package version 0.7.2, <https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstatix>. 60. Sales LP, Pires MM. Identifying climate change refugia for South American biodiversity. Conservation Biology. 2023 Mar 15. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14087 PMID: 36919472 61. Correa Ayram CA, Mendoza ME, Etter A, Salicrup DR. Habitat connectivity in biodiversity conservation: A review of recent studies and applications. Progress in Physical Geography. 2016 Feb; 40(1):7–37. 62. Brodie JF, Giordano AJ, Dickson B, Hebblewhite M, Bernard H, Mohd-Azlan J, et al. Evaluating multi- species landscape connectivity in a threatened tropical mammal community. Conservation Biology. 2015 Feb; 29(1):122–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12337 PMID: 25065425 63. Matos C, Petrovan SO, Wheeler PM, Ward AI. Landscape connectivity and spatial prioritization in an urbanising world: A network analysis approach for a threatened amphibian. Biological Conservation. 2019 Sep 1; 237:238–47.

64. Fraissinet M, Ancillotto L, Migliozzi A, Capasso S, Bosso L, Chamberlain DE, et al. Responses of avian assemblages to spatiotemporal landscape dynamics in urban ecosystems. Landscape Ecology. 2023 Jan; 38(1):293–305. 65. Wojkowski J, Wałęga A, Młyński D, Radecki-Pawlik A, Lepesˇka T, Piniewski M, et al. Are we losing water storage capacity mostly due to climate change–Analysis of the landscape hydric potential in selected catchments in East-Central Europe. Ecological Indicators. 2023 Oct 1; 154:110913. 66. Salinas-Ramos VB, Ancillotto L, Cistrone L, Nastasi C, Bosso L, Smeraldo S, et al. Artificial illumination influences niche segregation in bats. Environmental Pollution. 2021 Sep 1; 284:117187. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117187 PMID: 33906034 67. Ehlers Smith YC, Ehlers Smith DA, Ramesh T, Downs CT. Forest habitats in a mixed urban-agriculture mosaic landscape: patterns of mammal occupancy. Landscape Ecology. 2018 Jan; 33:59–76. 68. Jucker T, Hardwick SR, Both S, Elias DM, Ewers RM, Milodowski DT, et al. Canopy structure and topography jointly constrain the microclimate of human-modified tropical landscapes. Global change biology. 2018 Nov; 24(11):5243–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14415 PMID: 30246358 69. Mora´ n-Ordo´ ñez A, Hermoso V, Martı´nez-Salinas A. Multi-objective forest restoration planning in Costa Rica: Balancing landscape connectivity and ecosystem service provisioning with sustainable develop- ment. Journal of environmental management. 2022 May 15; 310:114717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jenvman.2022.114717 PMID: 35217445

70. Rayden T, Jones KR, Austin K, Radachowsky J. Improving climate and biodiversity outcomes through restoration of forest integrity. Conservation Biology. 2023 Dec; 37(6):e14163. https://doi.org/10.1111/ cobi.14163 PMID: 37581508 71. SINAC (Sistema Nacional de A´ reas de Conservacio´n, CR). 2018. Corredor Biolo´ gico Amistosa: Plan de Gestio´ n 2018–2027. Ed. H. Acevedo. La Gamba-Costa Rica.43 p. 72. Go´mez Hoyos DA., Valverde MR, Marı´n F, Jime´ nez Corrales K., Gutie´ rrez Figueroa J, Amador Ferna´ n- dez X. et al. Conceptual framework for conservation: participatory research, education and communica- tion in the AmistOsa Biological Corridor. UNED Research Journal, 2019. 14(S1), e3922. https://doi.org/ 10.22458/urj.v14iS1.3922 PLOS ONE Mapping climate adaptation corridors for biodiversity PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304756 May 31, 2024 19 / 19