Mapping climate adaptation corridors for biodiversity—A regional-scale case study in Central America
pmc-PMC11142673.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 19 trang
are many recent examples of research evaluating proposed corridors using ecological criteria in specific portions of Central America [27–29] but it is unknown to what extent such research might influence regional conservation planning or policymaking. What limited published research on regional or international connectivity in Central America has primarily focused on jaguars [30–33]. Costa Rica, whose National Biological Corridor Program consists of 44 corridors that cover 38% of the country, may be considered the most successful example of corridor implementa- tion in Central America. Greater forest protection and restoration associated with corridors have improved mammal species richness and functional connectivity within the region [34]. Although forest fragmentation significantly decreased in Costa Rican corridors since their adoption, these corridors still mostly consist of unprotected, privately owned land too small and fragmented to support populations of key mammal species such as jaguars and white- lipped peccary (Tayassu pecari) [35]. Perhaps even more concerning given ongoing climate change is that these existing corridors, even within a country known for its forward-thinking approach to conservation, were not designed to encompass the wide elevational gradients nec- essary to facilitate species range shifts under climate change [35, 36]. Hence, coordinated, regional-scale strategies are needed to facilitate connectivity among protected and well con- served areas across elevational gradients and identify focal locations for local- to landscape-
scale conservation efforts. This is particularly the case for small countries with limited pro- tected areas or land available for additional protection [24]. In this study, we map the spatial distribution of potential climate adaptation corridors throughout Central America, assess their conservation status and ecological characteristics (e.g., length, elevational breadth, forest condition), and calculate a priority index to support climate adaptation corridor implementation efforts and identify promising areas for future, finer-scale research or conservation activities. We hypothesize that potential climate adaptation corridors exist throughout the region, but vary widely in terms of protection and ecological condition, necessitating identification of those with the greatest potential to facilitate regional biodiversity persistence under climate change. Our study can help bridge the gap between local- and global- scale studies and move toward realizing the original vision of regional-scale connectivity under the MBC by facilitating systematic prioritization among numerous potential climate adaptation corridors and providing important baseline data (e.g., forest condition) that could be used to monitor future outcomes of corridors throughout the region. Application of our findings can help build a climate adaptation corridor network across elevational gradients in Central Amer- ica and guide conservation investments at multiple spatial scales. Materials and methods Study area Our main study area consisted of 7 Central American countries: Belize, Costa Rica, El Salva-
dor, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama (Fig 1). These countries encompass a total of 516,343 km2, approximately 30% of which is protected [37]. We buffered this area by 500 km to allow corridors originating in our 7 focal countries to cross or terminate in southeastern Mexico or northwestern Colombia. These additional areas increased our overall study area to 1,032,074 km2, approximately 21% of which is protected [37]. We did not consider oceanic or inland islands in our analysis. Overall workflow First, we identified start and end nodes. Start nodes were lowland protected areas and end nodes were contiguous, relatively intact patches of highland forest (either protected or PLOS ONE Mapping climate adaptation corridors for biodiversity PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304756 May 31, 2024 3 / 19