Shifts in bird ranges and conservation priorities in China under climate change

30. Butchart SHM, Stattersfield AJ, Bennun LA, Shutes SM, Akc¸akaya HR, Baillie JEM, et al. Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: Red list indices for birds. PLoS Biol. 2004; 2: e0020383. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020383 PMID: 15510230 31. Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Phillips T, Bonney R. Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol Soc. 2007; 12: 11. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02197-120211 32. Kosmala M, Wiggins A, Swanson A, Simmons B. Assessing data quality in citizen science. Front Ecol Environ. 2016; 14: 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1436 33. Callaghan CT, Poore AGB, Major RE, Rowley JJL, Cornwell WK. Optimizing future biodiversity sam- pling by citizen scientists. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2019; 286: 20191487. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb. 2019.1487 PMID: 31575364 34. Adler FR, Green AM, Sekercio H. Citizen science in ecology: a place for humans in nature. 2020; 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14340 PMID: 32216157 35. Hurlbert AH, Liang Z. Spatiotemporal variation in avian migration phenology: Citizen science reveals effects of climate change. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e0031662. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0031662 PMID: 22384050 36. Hu R, Wen C, Gu Y, Wang H, Gu L, Shi X, et al. A bird’s view of new conservation hotspots in China. Biol Conserv. 2017; 211: 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.03.033 37. Gu L, Wen C, Luo M, Wang H, Lu¨ Z. A rapid approach for assessing the conservation effectiveness of

the most concerned endangered species in China. Biodivers Sci. 2015; 23: 583–590. https://doi.org/10. 17520/biods.2015115 38. Zeng Q, Wei Q, Lei G. Contribution of citizen science towards cryptic species census: “many eyes” define wintering range of the Scaly-sided Merganser in mainland China. Avian Res. 2018; 9: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-018-0098-5 39. Li L, Hu R, Huang J, Zhu Z, Zhong J. A farmland biodiversity strategy is needed for China. 2020; 4: 772–774. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1161-2 PMID: 32221478 40. Van Strien AJ, Van Swaay CAM, Termaat T. Opportunistic citizen science data of animal species pro- duce reliable estimates of distribution trends if analysed with occupancy models. J Appl Ecol. 2013; 50:1450–1458. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12158 41. Devictor V, Whittaker RJ, Beltrame C. Beyond scarcity: Citizen science programmes as useful tools for conservation biogeography. Divers Distrib. 2010; 16: 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642. 2009.00615.x 42. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Dudı´k M, Schapire RE, Blair ME. Opening the black box: an open-source release of Maxent. Ecography (Cop). 2017; 40: 887–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03049 43. Isaac NJB, van Strien AJ, August TA, de Zeeuw MP, Roy DB. Statistics for citizen science: Extracting signals of change from noisy ecological data. Methods Ecol Evol. 2014; 5:1052–1060. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/2041-210X.12254 44. Wisz MS, Hijmans RJ, Li J, Peterson AT, Graham CH, Guisan A, et al. Effects of sample size on the per-

formance of species distribution models. Divers Distrib. 2008; 14: 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1472-4642.2008.00482.x 45. Hernandez PA, Graham CH, Master LL, L. AD. The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography (Cop). 2006; 29: 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2006.04700.x 46. Vollering J, Halvorsen R, Auestad I, Rydgren K. Bunching up the background betters bias in species dis- tribution models. Ecography (Cop). 2019; 42: 1717–1727. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04503 47. Kramer-Schadt S, Niedballa J, Pilgrim JD, Schro¨der B, Lindenborn J, Reinfelder V, et al. The impor- tance of correcting for sampling bias in MaxEnt species distribution models. Divers Distrib. 2013; 19: 1366–1379. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12096 48. Studds CE, Kendall BE, Murray NJ, Wilson HB, Rogers DI, Clemens RS, et al. Rapid population decline in migratory shorebirds relying on Yellow Sea tidal mudflats as stopover sites. Nat Commun. 2017; 8: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-016-0009-6 PMID: 28232747 49. Jia Y, Zeng Q, Wang Y, Saintilan N, Lei G, Wen L. Processes shaping wintering waterbird communities in an intensive modi fi ed landscape: Neutral assembly with dispersal limitation and localized competi- tion. Ecol Indic. 2020; 114: 106330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106330 50. Yu H, Wang X, Cao L, Zhang L, Jia Q, Lee H, et al. Are declining populations of wild geese in China

‘prisoners’ of their natural habitats? Curr Biol. 2017; 27: R376–R377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub. 2017.04.037 PMID: 28535385 51. Xu Y, Si Y, Takekawa J, Liu Q, Prins HHT, Yin S, et al. A network approach to prioritize conservation efforts for migratory birds. Conserv Biol. 2019; 34: 416–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13383 PMID: 31268188 PLOS ONE Bird range changes call for innovative conservation in China PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240225 October 8, 2020 18 / 20