Social network analysis and the implications for Pontocaspian biodiversity conservation in Romania and Ukraine: A comparative study

47. Paletto A, Hamunen K, De Meo I. Social network analysis to support stakeholder analysis in participa- tory forest planning. Society & natural resources. 2015; 28(10):1108–25. 48. Stork D, Richards WD. Nonrespondents in communication network studies: Problems and possibilities. Group & Organization Management. 1992; 17(2):193–209. 49. Csardi G, Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Com- plex Systems. 2006; 1695(5):1–9. 50. Opsahl T. Structure and evolution of weighted networks: Queen Mary, University of London; 2009. 51. Grilli G, Garegnani G, Poljanec A, Ficko A, Vettorato D, De Meo I, et al. Stakeholder analysis in the bio- mass energy development based on the experts’ opinions: the example of Triglav National Park in Slo- venia. Folia Forestalia Polonica. 2015; 57(3):173–86. 52. Burt RS. Structural holes and good ideas. American journal of sociology. 2004; 110(2):349–99. 53. Burt RS. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 1992. 54. Fazey I, Evely AC, Reed MS, Stringer LC, Kruijsen J, White PC, et al. Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management. Environmental Conservation. 2013; 40(1):19–36. 55. Newman ME. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM review. 2003; 45(2):167–256. 56. Ryan GW, Bernard HR. Techniques to identify themes. Field methods. 2003; 15(1):85–109. 57. Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing

taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health services research. 2007; 42(4):1758–72. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x PMID: 17286625 58. Bogdan R, Taylor SJ. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York; 1975. 59. Glaser BG, Strauss AL, Strutzel E. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research New York Aldine De Gruyter. Inc; 1967. 60. ICPDR. The Danube river basin district management plan: ICPDR-Internat. Commission for the Protec- tion of the Danube River Secretariat; 2015. 61. Hermoso V, Clavero M, Villero D, Brotons L. EU’s conservation efforts need more strategic investment to meet continental commitments. Conservation Letters. 2017; 10(2):231–7. 62. Nita A, Rozylowicz L, Manolache S, Ciocănea CM, Miu IV, Popescu VD. Collaboration networks in applied conservation projects across Europe. PloS one. 2016; 11(10):e0164503. https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pone.0164503 PMID: 27723834 63. Lazega E, Quintane E, Casenaz S. Collegial oligarchy and networks of normative alignments in trans- national institution building. Social Networks. 2017; 48:10–22. 64. Kluvankova-Oravska T, Chobotova´ V, Banaszak I, Slavikova L, Trifunovova S. From government to governance for biodiversity: the perspective of central and Eastern European transition countries. Envi- ronmental Policy and Governance. 2009; 19(3):186–96. 65. Wesselink A, Paavola J, Fritsch O, Renn O. Rationales for public participation in environmental policy and governance: practitioners’ perspectives. Environment and Planning A. 2011; 43(11):2688–704.

66. Manolache S, Nita A, Ciocanea CM, Popescu VD, Rozylowicz L. Power, influence and structure in Natura 2000 governance networks. A comparative analysis of two protected areas in Romania. Journal of environmental management. 2018; 212:54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.076 PMID: 29428654 67. Ostrom E, Burger J, Field CB, Norgaard RB, Policansky D. Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. science. 1999; 284(5412):278–82. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5412.278 PMID: 10195886 68. Dumont H, Mamaev V, Zaitsev Y. Black Sea Red Data Book. United Nations Office for Project Services. 1999:413. 69. Cuttelod A, Seddon M, Neubert E. European red list of non-marine molluscs: Publications office of the European Union Luxembourg; 2011. 70. Akimov I. Red Data Book of Ukraine. Animal World. Globalconsulting, Kiev, Ukraine.[In Ukrainian.]; 2009. 71. Baboianu G. Danube Delta: The Transboundary Wetlands (Romania and Ukraine). The Wetland Book: II: Distribution, Description and Conservation. 2016:1–12. 72. Strat D, Mihăilescu S, Sandu CS, Sahlean TC, editors. Conservation status of species and habitats of community importance on the Romanian Black Sea coast. Sabotinov N(Ed-in-Chief), Book of Abstracts, First European Symposium Research, conservation and management of biodiversity in the European seashores-RCMBES; 2017. PLOS ONE Social network analysis and the implications for Pontocaspian biodiversity conservation in Romania and Ukraine PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221833 October 23, 2020 19 / 20