Understanding scientists’ communication challenges at the intersection of climate and agriculture

82. Kiley J. Ideological divide over global warming as wide as ever. Pew Research Center. 16 Jun 2015. Available: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/16/ideological-divide-over-global-warming- as-wide-as-ever/ 83. Chatrchyan AM, Erlebacher RC, Chaopricha NT, Chan J, Tobin D, Allred SB. United States Agricul- tural Stakeholder Views and Decisions on Climate Change: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 2017; 8: 21. 84. Arbuckle JG, Hobbs J, Loy A, Morton LW, Prokopy LS, Tyndall J. Understanding Corn Belt farmer per- spectives on climate change to inform engagement strategies for adaptation and mitigation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 2014; 69: 505–516. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.69.6.505 85. Jemison J, Hall D, Welcomer S, Haskell J. How to Communicate with Farmers about Climate Change: Farmers’ Perceptions and Adaptations to Increasingly Variable Weather Patterns in Maine (USA). JAFSCD. 2014; 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2014.044.001 86. Prokopy LS, Floress K, Arbuckle JG, Church SP, Eanes FR, Gao Y, et al. Adoption of agricultural con- servation practices in the United States: Evidence from 35 years of quantitative literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 2019; 74: 520–534. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.74.5.520 87. Ranjan P, Church SP, Floress K, Prokopy LS. Synthesizing Conservation Motivations and Barriers: What Have We Learned from Qualitative Studies of Farmers’ Behaviors in the United States? Society & Natural Resources. 2019; 32: 1171–1199. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1648710

88. Mase AS, Cho H, Prokopy LS. Enhancing the Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF) by exploring trust, the availability heuristic, and agricultural advisors’ belief in climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2015; 41: 166–176. 89. Church SP, Haigh T, Widhalm M, de Jalon SG, Babin N, Carlton JS, et al. Agricultural trade publica- tions and the 2012 Midwestern US drought: A missed opportunity for climate risk communication. Cli- mate Risk Management. 2017; 15: 45–60. 90. Gauchat G. Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere: A Study of Public Trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. Am Sociol Rev. 2012; 77: 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412438225 91. Kennedy Brian, Tyson Alec, Funk Cary. Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Other Groups Declines. Pew Research Center; 2022 Feb. Available: https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2022/02/15/americans- trust-in-scientists-other-groups-declines/ 92. Sauer MA, Truelove S, Gerste AK, Limaye RJ. A failure to communicate? How public messaging has strained the COVID-19 response in the United States. Health security. 2021; 19: 65–74. https://doi. org/10.1089/hs.2020.0190 PMID: 33606575 93. Davidson EA, Suddick EC, Rice CW, Prokopy LS. More food, low pollution (Mo Fo Lo Po): a grand challenge for the 21st century. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2015; 44: 305–311. https://doi.org/ 10.2134/jeq2015.02.0078 PMID: 26023950 94. Haigh T, Morton LW, Lemos MC, Knutson C, Prokopy LS, Lo YJ, et al. Agricultural advisors as climate

information intermediaries: Exploring differences in capacity to communicate climate. Weather, Cli- mate, and Society. 2015; 7: 83–93. 95. Lu J, Singh AS, Koundinya V, Ranjan P, Haigh T, Getson JM, et al. Explaining the use of online agricul- tural decision support tools with weather or climate information in the Midwestern United States. Jour- nal of Environmental Management. 2021; 279: 111758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020. 111758 PMID: 33321352 96. Prokopy LS, Bartels W-L, Burniske G, Power R. Agricultural extension and climate change communi- cation. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. 2017. 97. Drummond C, Fischhoff B. Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017; 114: 9587–9592. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704882114 PMID: 28827344 98. Fujitani M, McFall A, Randler C, Arlinghaus R. Participatory adaptive management leads to environ- mental learning outcomes extending beyond the sphere of science. Science Advances. 2017; 3: e1602516. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602516 PMID: 28630904 99. Mulrennan ME, Mark R, Scott CH. Revamping community-based conservation through participatory research. The Canadian Geographer/Le Ge´ ographe canadien. 2012; 56: 243–259. 100. Prokopy LS, Floress K. Measuring the citizen effect: What does good citizen involvement look like? Pathways for getting to better water quality: the citizen effect. Springer; 2011. pp. 83–93.

101. Lemos MC, Arnott JC, Ardoin NM, Baja K, Bednarek AT, Dewulf A, et al. To co-produce or not to co- produce. Nature Sustainability. 2018; 1: 722–724. 102. Wyborn C, Datta A, Montana J, Ryan M, Leith P, Chaffin B, et al. Co-producing sustainability: reorder- ing the governance of science, policy, and practice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2019; 44: 319–346. PLOS ONE Understanding scientists’ communication challenges at the intersection of climate and agriculture PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269927 August 2, 2022 21 / 22