Thông tin tài nguyên

Understanding scientists’ communication challenges at the intersection of climate and agriculture

pmc-PMC9345487.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 22 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 20 · Đoạn 57Vị trí nguồn

59. Reddy SM, Wardropper C, Weigel C, Masuda YJ, Harden S, Ranjan P, et al. Conservation behavior and effects of economic and environmental message frames. Conservation Letters. 2020; 13: e12750. 60. Rumble JN, Holt J, Irani T. The Power of Words: Exploring Consumers’ Perceptions of Words Com- monly Associated with Agriculture. Journal of Applied Communications. 2014; 98. https://doi.org/10. 4148/1051-0834.1072 61. Wilke AK, Morton LW. Climatologists’ Communication of Climate Science to the Agricultural Sector. Science Communication. 2015; 37: 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015581927 62. Hassol SJ. Improving How Scientists Communicate About Climate Change. Eos Trans AGU. 2008; 89: 106. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008EO110002 63. Fischhoff B, Davis AL. Communicating scientific uncertainty. PNAS. 2014; 111: 13664–13671. https:// doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317504111 PMID: 25225390 64. Lehmann J, Rillig M. Distinguishing variability from uncertainty. Nature Climate Change. 2014; 4: 153. 65. Post S. Communicating science in public controversies: Strategic considerations of the German cli- mate scientists. Public Underst Sci. 2016; 25: 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514521542 PMID: 24583579 66. Howe LC, MacInnis B, Krosnick JA, Markowitz EM, Socolow R. Acknowledging uncertainty impacts public acceptance of climate scientists’ predictions. Nat Clim Chang. 2019 [cited 30 Oct 2019]. https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0587-5 67. Somerville RCJ, Hassol SJ. Communicating the science of climate change. Physics Today. 2011; 6.

Trang 20 · Đoạn 58Vị trí nguồn

68. Prokopy LS, Haigh T, Mase AS, Angel J, Hart C, Knutson C, et al. Agricultural Advisors: A Receptive Audience for Weather and Climate Information? Wea Climate Soc. 2013; 5: 162–167. https://doi.org/ 10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00036.1 69. Wilke AK. Communicating Climate Science: Components of Engaging the Agricultural Audience. Iowa State University Summer Symposium on Science Communication. Iowa State University, Digital Press; 2013. p. 12244629. https://doi.org/10.31274/sciencecommunication-180809-53 70. Smoke, Mirrors & Hot Air: How ExxonMobil Uses Big Tobacco’s Tactics to Manufacture Uncertainty on Climate Science. Union of Concerned Scientists; 2007. Available: https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/ default/files/legacy/assets/documents/global_warming/exxon_report.pdf 71. Morton LW, Roesch-McNally G, Wilke AK. Upper Midwest farmer perceptions: Too much uncertainty about impacts of climate change to justify changing current agricultural practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 2017; 72: 215–225. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.72.3.215 72. Getson JM, Church SP, Esman LA, Hatfield JL, Prokopy LS. USDA-NIFA Climate Portfolio: Project Director Survey Report. West Lafayette: Purdue University; 2018 Oct p. 190. Available: https://www. purdue.edu/fnr/prokopy/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/NIFA_Climate_PDsurvey_Descriptive_Report_ 201811.pdf 73. Myers TA, Maibach E, Peters E, Leiserowitz A. Simple Messages Help Set the Record Straight about Scientific Agreement on Human-Caused Climate Change: The Results of Two Experiments. PLOS

Trang 20 · Đoạn 59Vị trí nguồn

ONE. 2015; 18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120985 PMID: 25812121 74. van der Linden SL, Leiserowitz AA, Feinberg GD, Maibach EW. How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: plain facts, pie charts or metaphors? Climatic Change. 2014; 126: 255– 262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1190-4 75. Moser SC. Communicating adaptation to climate change: the art and science of public engagement when climate change comes home. 2014; 5: 22. 76. Penfold N. Science Communication: Know your audience. In: Naturejobs [Internet]. 21 Aug 2015. Available: http://blogs.nature.com/NATUREJOBS/2015/08/21/SCIENCE-COMMUNICATION- KNOW-YOUR-AUDIENCE/ 77. Singh A, Getson J, Esman L, Koundinya V, Klink JK, Mase A, et al. Farmers’ Climate Risk Perceptions and Use of Climate Information: 2016 Survey Data. 2018. https://doi.org/10.4231/R78W3BBV 78. Koundinya V, Klink J, Mase A, Robinson C, Haigh T, Singh A, et al. Advisors’ Climate Risk Perceptions and Use of Climate Information: 2016 Survey Data. 2018. Available: https://purr.purdue.edu/ publications/2535/1 79. Church SP, Dunn M, Prokopy LS. Benefits to Qualitative Data Quality with Multiple Coders: Two Case Studies in Multi-coder Data Analysis. Journal of Rural Social Sciences. 2019; 34: 16. 80. Lord A. What Your Job Says About Your Politics. Huffington Post. 3 Jun 2015. Available: https://www. huffpost.com/entry/job-politics-prediction_n_7503590 81. Dunlap RE, McCright AM, Yarosh JH. The Political Divide on Climate Change: Partisan Polarization

Trang 20 · Đoạn 60Vị trí nguồn

Widens in the U.S. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 2016; 58: 4–23. PLOS ONE Understanding scientists’ communication challenges at the intersection of climate and agriculture PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269927 August 2, 2022 20 / 22