Understanding scientists’ communication challenges at the intersection of climate and agriculture
pmc-PMC9345487.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 22 trang
36. Webb AB, Fetsch CR, Israel E, Roman CM, Encarnacio´n CH, Zacks JM, et al. Training scientists in a science center improves science communication to the public. Advances in Physiology Education. 2012; 36: 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00088.2010 PMID: 22383418 37. Adaption Science Interagency Working Group. FY 2013 Federal Agency Climate Change Adaptation Plans: Summary of Research and Information Needs. United States Global Change Resarch Pro- gram; 2013. Available: https://downloads.globalchange.gov/adaptation/FY2013_Federal_Adaptation_ Plan_Summary.pdf 38. Entradas M, Marcelino J, Bauer MW, Lewenstein B. Public communication by climate scientists: what, with whom and why? Climatic Change. 2019; 154: 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02414- 9 39. Fischhoff B. The sciences of science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences. 2013; 110: 14033–14039. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213273110 PMID: 23942125 40. Austin EW, Pinkleton BE. Strategic public relations management: planning and managing effective communication programs. Third edition. New York; London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2015. 41. Fischhoff B. Non-persuasive Communication About Matters of Greatest Urgency: Climate Change. Environmental Science & Technology. 2007; 5. 42. Cartwright SJ, Bowgen KM, Collop C, Hyder K, Nabe-Nielsen J, Stafford R, et al. Communicating com- plex ecological models to non-scientist end users. Ecological Modelling. 2016; 338: 51–59. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.07.012
43. Patt AG, Schrag DP. Using Specific Language to Describe Risk and Probability. Climate change. 2003; 61: 14. 44. Breakwell GM. Models of risk construction: some applications to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplin- ary Reviews: Climate Change. 2010; 1: 14. 45. Hatfield JL, Boote KJ, Kimball BA, Ziska LH, Izaurralde RC, Ort D, et al. Climate Impacts on Agricul- ture: Implications for Crop Production. Agronomy Journal. 2011; 103: 351. https://doi.org/10.2134/ agronj2010.0303 46. Pidgeon N, Fischhoff B. The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Clim Change. 2011; 1: 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1080 47. Kasperson RE, Kasperson JX. The Social Amplification and Attenuation of Risk. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1996; 545: 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0002716296545001010 48. Dietz T, Dan A, Shwom R. Support for Climate Change Policy: Social Psychological and Social Struc- tural Influences*. Rural Sociology. 2007; 72: 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1526/003601107781170026 49. Lupia A. Communicating science in politicized environments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013; 110: 14048–14054. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212726110 PMID: 23940336 50. Albarracı´n D, Vargas P. Attitudes and Persuasion. Handbook of Social Psychology. American Cancer Society; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001011 51. Bolsen T, Palm R, Kingsland JT. The Impact of Message Source on the Effectiveness of Communica-
tions About Climate Change. Science Communication. 2019; 41: 464–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1075547019863154 52. Rogers R. Cognitive and physiological processes in fear-based attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook. New York; 1983. pp. 153–176. 53. Dietz T. Bringing values and deliberation to science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013; 110: 14081–14087. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212740110 PMID: 23940350 54. Gamson WA, Modigliani A. Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach. American Journal of Sociology. 1989; 95: 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213 55. Scheufele D. Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication. 1999; 20. 56. Dickinson JL, Crain R, Yalowitz S, Cherry TM. How Framing Climate Change Influences Citizen Scien- tists’ Intentions to Do Something About It. The Journal of Environmental Education. 2013; 44: 145– 158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2012.742032 57. Wibeck V. Enhancing learning, communication and public engagement about climate change–some lessons from recent literature. Environmental Education Research. 2014; 20: 387–411. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13504622.2013.812720 58. Cvitanovic C, Hobday AJ. Building optimism at the environmental science-policy-practice interface through the study of bright spots. Nat Commun. 2018; 9: 3466. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018- 05977-w PMID: 30154434 PLOS ONE
Understanding scientists’ communication challenges at the intersection of climate and agriculture PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269927 August 2, 2022 19 / 22