Understanding scientists’ communication challenges at the intersection of climate and agriculture

14. Niles MT, Mueller ND. Farmer perceptions of climate change: Associations with observed temperature and precipitation trends, irrigation, and climate beliefs. Global Environmental Change. 2016; 39: 133– 142. 15. Maas A, Wardropper C, Roesch-McNally G, Abatzoglou J. A (mis) alignment of farmer experience and perceptions of climate change in the US inland Pacific Northwest. Climatic Change. 2020; 162: 1011– 1029. 16. Oreskes N, Conway EM. Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. 1st ed. New York: Bloomsbury Press; 2010. 17. Sterman JD. Communicating climate change risks in a skeptical world. Climatic Change. 2011; 108: 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0189-3 18. Wilke AK, Morton LW. Climatologists’ patterns of conveying climate science to the agricultural commu- nity. Agric Hum Values. 2015; 32: 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9531-5 19. Church SP, Dunn M, Babin N, Mase AS, Haigh T, Prokopy LS. Do advisors perceive climate change as an agricultural risk? An in-depth examination of Midwestern US Ag advisors’ views on drought, cli- mate change, and risk management. Agriculture and human values. 2018; 35: 349–365. 20. Prokopy LS, Morton LW, Jr JGA, Mase AS, Wilke AK. Agricultural stakeholder views on climate change: implications for conducting research and outreach. Bulletin of the American Meterological Society. 2015; 96: 181–190. 21. Rainie L, Funk C, Anderson M. How scientists engage the public. Pew Research Center. 2015.

22. Getson JM, Sjo¨strand AE, Church SP, Weiner R, Hatfield JL, Prokopy LS. Do scientists have a responsibility to provide climate change expertise to mitigation and adaptation strategies? Perspec- tives from climate professionals. Public Understanding of Science. 2020; 0963662520966690. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0963662520966690 PMID: 33094696 23. Illingworth S. Delivering effective science communication: advice from a professional science commu- nicator. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. Elsevier; 2017. pp. 10–16. 24. Kahan DM. On the sources of ordinary science knowledge and extraordinary science ignorance. The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication. 2017; 35: 35–50. 25. Brossard D, Scheufele DA, Kim E, Lewenstein BV. Religiosity as a perceptual filter: Examining pro- cesses of opinion formation about nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science. 2009; 18: 546– 558. 26. Nisbet MC, Scheufele DA. What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany. 2009; 96: 1767–1778. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041 PMID: 21622297 27. Pasek J. It’s not my consensus: Motivated reasoning and the sources of scientific illiteracy. Public Understanding of Science. 2018. pp. 787–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517733681 PMID: 28942728 28. Wynne B. Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science–hitting the notes, but missing the music? Public Health Genomics. 2006; 9: 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1159/000092659 PMID: 16741352

29. Simis MJ, Madden H, Cacciatore MA, Yeo SK. The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model per- sist in science communication? Public understanding of science. 2016; 25: 400–414. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0963662516629749 PMID: 27117768 30. Hart PS, Nisbet EC. Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication research. 2012; 39: 701–723. 31. Holland EA, Pleasant A, Quatrano S, Gerst R, Nisbet MC, Mooney C. Letters: The risks andd advan- tages of framing science. Science. 2007; 317: 1168b. 32. Petersen AM, Vincent EM, Westerling AL. Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of cli- mate change scientists and contrarians. Nat Commun. 2019; 10: 3502. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-019-09959-4 PMID: 31409789 33. Moser SC. Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions: Com- municating climate change. WIREs Clim Change. 2010; 1: 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.11 34. Varner J. Scientific Outreach: Toward Effective Public Engagement with Biological Science. BioSci- ence. 2014; 64: 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu021 35. Brownell SE, Price JV, Steinman L. Science Communication to the General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students this Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training. The Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education. 2013; 12: 5. PLOS ONE Understanding scientists’ communication challenges at the intersection of climate and agriculture

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269927 August 2, 2022 18 / 22