Thông tin tài nguyên

Deep-sea biodiversity at the extremes of the Salas y Gómez and Nazca ridges with implications for conservation

pmc-PMC8244922.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 27 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 27 · Đoạn 68Vị trí nguồn

108. Ya´ñez E, Silva C, Marabolı´ J, Go´ mez F, Silva N, O´ rdenes A, et al. A´ rea marina de proteccio´n de la bio- diversidad de recursos pela´ gicos en los montes submarinos de la Cordillera Nazca. Ape´ ndice modelo para la presentacio´ n de la informacio´ n cientı´fica para la descripcio´ n de a´ reas marinas de importancia ecolo´ gica o biolo´ gica, Conv. Sobre la Divers. Biolo´ gica 5 (2012). 109. Hucke-Gaete R, Aguayo-Lobo A, Yancovic-Pakarati S, Flores M. Marine mammals of Easter Island (Rapa Nui) and Salas y Go´ mez Island (Motu Motiro Hiva), Chile: a review and new records. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research. 2014; 42(4): 743–751. 110. CBD 2017. Ecologically or Biologically Significant Areas (EBSAs)—Dorsal de Nazca y de Salas y Go´ mez (Salas y Go´mez and Nazca Ridges). 8 pp. 111. SERNANP 2020. Expediente te´ cnico preliminar: Reserva Nacional Dorsal de Nasca. Mayo 2020. Available online at: h http://www.sernanp.gob.pe/reserva-nacional-dorsal-de-nasca i. 112. Sala E, Mayorga J, Bradley D, Cabral R, Atwood TB, Auber A, et al. Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate. Nature. 2021; 592: 397–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021- 03371-z PMID: 33731930 113. Zhao Q, Stephenson F, Lundquist C, Kaschner K, Jayathilake D, Costello MJ. Where Marine Pro- tected Areas would best represent 30% of ocean biodiversity. Biological Conservation. 2020; 244: 108536. 114. Visalli ME, Best BD, Cabral RB, Cheung WW, Clark NA, Garilao C, et al. Data-driven approach for

Trang 27 · Đoạn 69Vị trí nguồn

highlighting priority areas for protection in marine areas beyond national jurisdiction. Marine Policy. 2020; 122: 103927. 115. Clark N, Reville G. A path to creating the first generation of high seas protected areas—science-based method highlights 10 sites that would help safeguard biodiversity beyond national waters, PEW Chari- table Trusts 42 (2020). 116. Clark MR, Rowden AA, Schlacher TA, Guinotte J, Dunstan PK, Williams A, et al. Identifying Ecolog- ically or Biologically Significant Areas (EBSA): a systematic method and its application to seamounts in the South Pacific Ocean. Ocean & Coastal Management. 2014; 91: 65–79. 117. Lucifora LO, Garcı´a VB, Worm B. Global diversity hotspots and conservation priorities for sharks. PloS ONE. 2011; 6(5): e19356. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019356 PMID: 21573162 118. Georgian SE, Morgan L, Wagner D (in review). The modeled distribution of corals and sponges sur- rounding the Salas y Go´ mez and Nazca ridges with implications for high seas conservation. PeerJ. 119. Mayer L, Jakobsson M, Allen G, Dorschel B, Falconer R, Ferrini V, et al. The Nippon Foundation— GEBCO seabed 2030 project: The quest to see the world’s oceans completely mapped by 2030. Geo- sciences. 2018; 8(2): 63–81. 120. Bailey DM, King NJ, Priede IG. Cameras and carcasses: historical and current methods for using artifi- cial food falls to study deep-water animals. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2007; 350: 179–191. 121. Priede IG, Bagley PM. In situ studies on deep-sea demersal fishes using autonomous unmanned

Trang 27 · Đoạn 70Vị trí nguồn

lander platforms. Oceanography and Marine Biology. 2000; 38: 357–392. 122. Jetz W, McGeoch MA, Guralnick R, Ferrier S, Beck J, Costello MJ, et al Essential biodiversity vari- ables for mapping and monitoring species populations. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2019; 3(4): 539– 551. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0826-1 PMID: 30858594 123. Yeh J, Drazen JC. Baited-camera observations of deep-sea megafaunal scavenger ecology on the California slope. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2011; 424: 145–156. PLOS ONE Deep-sea biodiversity along the Salas y Go´ mez and Nazca ridges PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253213 June 30, 2021 27 / 27