What’s all that racket! Soundscapes, phenology, and biodiversity in estuaries

31. Kharouba H. M., Ehrle´ n J., Gelman A., Bolmgren K., Allen J. M., Travers S. E., et al, Global shifts in the phenological synchrony of species interactions over recent decades. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 5211–5216 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714511115 PMID: 29666247 32. Visser M. E., Phenology: Interactions of climate change and species. Nature, 535, 236–237 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18905 PMID: 27362228 33. Loman J., Breeding phenology in Rana temporaria. Local variation is due to pond temperature and pop- ulation size. Ecol Evol. 6(17):6202–6209 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2356 PMID: 27648237 34. Van Buskirk J., Mulvihill R. S., Leberman R. C., Variable shifts in spring and autumn migration phenol- ogy in North American songbirds associated with climate change. Glob Chang Biol, 15: 760–771 (2009). 35. Vermeij M. J. A., Marhaver K. L., Huijbers C. M., Nagelkerken I., Stephen D D. (2010) Coral larvae move toward reef sounds. PloS One 5, 3–6 (2010). 36. Lillis A., Eggleston D. B., Bohnenstiehl D. R., Oyster larvae settle in response to habitat–associated underwater sounds. PloS One 8:e79337 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079337 PMID: 24205381 37. Lillis A., Apprill A., Suca J. J., Becker C., Llopiz J. K., Mooney T. A., Soundscapes influence the settle- ment of the common Caribbean coral Porites astreoides irrespective of light conditions. R. Soc. Open. Sci. 12(5), 181358 (2018). 38. Stanley J. A., Radford C. A., Jeffs A. G., Location, location, location–finding a suitable home in amongst

the noise. Proc. Royal Soc. 279: 3622–3631 (2012). 39. Oksanen J., Blanchet F. G., Friendly M., Kindt R., Legendre P., McGlinn D., et al, vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5–4 (2019). 40. Kursa M. B., Rudnicki W. R., Feature selection with the Boruta package. J. Stat. Softw. 36, 1–13 (2010). 41. Kursa M. B., rFerns: an implementation of the random ferns method for general-purpose machine learn- ing. J. Stat. Softw. 61, 10 (2014). 42. Wright M. N., Ziegler A., Ranger: a fast implementation of random forests for high dimensional data in C ++ and R. J. Stat. Softw. 77, 1–17 (2017). 43. Degenhardt F., Seifert S., Szymczak S., Evaluation of variable selection methods for random forests and omics data sets. Brief Bioinform 22, 492–503 (2019). 44. Strobl A. L. Boulesteix, A. Zeileis, T. Hothorn, Bias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations. Sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 25 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471- 2105-8-25 PMID: 17254353 45. Altmann A., Toloşi L., Sander O., Lengauer T., Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure. Bioinformatics 26, 1340–7 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq134 PMID: 20385727 46. Nembrini S., Ko¨ nig I. R., Wright M. N., The revival of the Gini importance? Bioinformatics 34, 3711– 3718 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty373 PMID: 29757357 47. Diaz-Uriarte R., de Andres S. A., Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random for- est. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 1–13 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-1

48. Li J., Siwabessy J., Tran M., Huang Z., Heap A., Predicting seabed hardness using Random Forest in R, in: Data mining applications with R, Zhao Y, Cen Y, Eds. Elsevier p. 299–329 (2013). 49. Breiman L., Random forests. Machine learning, 45, 5–32 (2001). 50. Lau M. K., DTK: Dunnett-Tukey-Kramer pairwise multiple comparison test adjusted for unequal vari- ances and unequal sample sizes. R package version 3.5 (2013). 51. Barry J. A. Hartigan, A Bayesian analysis for change point problems. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 88, 309–319 (1993). 52. Erdman J. W. Emerson, bcp: an R Package for performing a Bayesian analysis of change point prob- lems. J. Stat. Softw. 23, 1–13 (2007). PLOS ONE Estuarine soundscapes and biodiversity PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236874 September 3, 2020 18 / 18