Thông tin tài nguyên

Visual digital intermediaries and global climate communication: Is climate change still a distant problem on YouTube?

pmc-PMC11978093.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 23 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 22 · Đoạn 58Vị trí nguồn

PLOS ONE Visual digital intermediaries and global climate communication 47. Yang T, Peng Y. The importance of trending topics in the gatekeeping of social media news engagement: A natural experiment on Weibo. Commun Res. 2020;49(7):994–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220933729 48. Pan B, Hembrooke H, Joachims T, Lorigo L, Gay G, Granka L. In Google we trust: Users’ decisions on rank, position, and relevance. J Comput-Med Commun. 2007;12(3):801–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00351.x 49. Silverstein C, Marais H, Henzinger M, Moricz M. Analysis of a very large web search engine query log. SIGIR Forum. 1999;33(1):6–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/331403.331405 50. Mittelstadt B. Auditing for transparency in content personalization systems. Int J Commun. 2016;10:12. 51. Sandvig C, Hamilton K, Karahalios K, Langbort C. Auditing algorithms: Research methods for detecting discrimination on internet platforms. Seattle; 2014. 52. Ulloa R, Richter AC, Makhortykh M, Urman A, Kacperski CS. Representativeness and face-ism: Gender bias in image search. New Media Soc. 2024;26(6):3541–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221100699 PMID: 38774557 53. Hussein E, Juneja P, Mitra T. Measuring misinformation in video search platforms: An audit study on YouTube. Proc ACM Hum-Comput Interact. 2020;4(CSCW1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392854 54. Makhortykh M, Urman A, Ulloa R. Hey, Google, is it what the Holocaust looked like? First Monday. 2021. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i10.11562 55. Puschmann C. Beyond the bubble: Assessing the diversity of political search results. Dig J.

Trang 22 · Đoạn 59Vị trí nguồn

2018;7(6):824–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1539626 56. Möller J, Trilling D, Helberger N, van Es B. Do not blame it on the algorithm: An empirical assessment of multiple recommender systems and their impact on content diversity. Inform Commun Soc. 2018;21(7):959–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2018.1444076 57. Lucas D. Introna, Helen Nissenbaum. Shaping the web: Why the politics of search engines matters. Inform Soc. 2000;16(3):169–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240050133634 58. Trielli D, Diakopoulos N. Search as news curator. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems; 2019. p. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300683 59. Li N, Anderson AA, Brossard D, Scheufele DA. Channeling science information seekers’ attention? A content analysis of top-ranked vs. lower-ranked sites in Google. J Comput-Mediat Commun. 2013;19(3):562–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12043 60. Mejova Y, Gracyk T, Robertson R. Googling for abortion: Search engine mediation of abortion accessibility in the United States. J Quant Desc. 2022;2. https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2022.007 61. Ballatore A, Graham M, Sen S. Digital hegemonies: The localness of search engine results. Ann Am Assoc Geogr. 2017;107(5):1194–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1308240 62. DeVries T, Misra I, Wang C. Does object recognition work for everyone? In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR) workshops; 2019. p. 52–9. 63. Kitchin R. Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Inform Commun Soc.

Trang 22 · Đoạn 60Vị trí nguồn

2016;20(1):14–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1154087 64. Gillespie T. The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media Soc. 2010;12(3):347–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738 65. Gibbs M, Meese J, Arnold M, Nansen B, Carter M. Funeral and Instagram: Death, social media, and platform vernacular. Inform Commun Soc. 2014;18(3):255–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2014.987152 66. Matamoros-Fernández A, Gray JE, Bartolo L, Burgess J, Suzor N. What’s “Up Next”? investigating algorithmic recommendations on YouTube across issues and over time. Media Commun. 2021;9(4):234–49. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4184 67. Moe H. Comparing platform “Ranking Cultures” across languages: The case of Islam on YouTube in Scandinavia. Soc Media Soc. 2019;5(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118817038 68. Haim M. Agent-based testing: An automated approach toward artificial reactions to human behavior. J Stud. 2020;21(7):895–911. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2019.1702892 69. Bounegru L, De Pryck K, Venturini T, Mauri M. “We only have 12 years”: YouTube and the IPCC report on global warming of 1.5°C. First Monday; 2020. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i2.10112 70. Allgaier J. Science and environmental communication on YouTube: Strategically distorted communications in online videos on climate change and climate engineering. Front Commun. 2019;4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00036 PLOS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318338 April 8, 2025 22/ 23