Grazing and light modify Silene latifolia responses to nutrients and future climate
pmc-PMC9642889.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 16 trang
plant communities should harbor species which are able to tolerate direct and interactive pres- sures of these drivers [5,6]. To predict and understand overall community responses, it is therefore essential to identify how abiotic and biotic changes interactively influence plant per- sistence and competitive ability. One approach to assess plant vulnerability to current global change drivers is measuring intraspecific trait responses which can relate to plant performance [7,8]. However, while some studies have examined individual species’ traits and performance in response to different land-use types [9,10], studies examining the combined impacts of nutrient enrichment, grazing and climate change are scarce [but see 8,11], particularly in tem- perate systems. In addition, not much is known about the mechanisms driving these trait- based plant responses. Nutrient enrichment directly increases plant available nutrients and can thus increase plant growth and biomass accumulation [12,13] and lead to larger SLA and higher relative foliar N content [14,15]. Fertilization-induced enhanced plant growth and leaf enlargement can reduce light availability in the understory [16,17], disfavoring small-statured species with resource- conservative traits (i.e., small SLA, high foliar C:N) [18]. Consequently, tall-statured species with resource-acquisitive traits (i.e., large SLA, low foliar C:N) should perform better and dominate in nutrient-rich conditions [15,19–21]. In a study conducted in forest understory
[22], plant height increased and SLA decreased in response to light addition, but were unaf- fected by fertilization, suggesting that light was more limiting than nutrients for trait manifes- tation [23]. However, results from other systems, such as grasslands, might differ, because they lack shade created by trees and plant species inhabiting grasslands might be less well adapted to shaded conditions [24]. However, little is known about grassland plant responses to light, and how light interacts with other factors to control plant performance and traits, as no field studies have directly added light. Many grassland systems are also intensively grazed by mam- malian herbivores that can further alter resource availability and plant responses to resource availability. Grazing can reduce fertilization-induced light limitation which has, on the community level, a beneficial effect for biodiversity [16]. On the individual plant level, the direct effect of grazing on plant growth depends on grazing intensity [25] and plant traits (i.e., stature, leaf size, leaf nutritional composition) that affect vulnerability to herbivory [11,26–28]. In general, grazing affects plant growth by decreasing height and biomass which can reduce plant perfor- mance [26,29,30], but grazing can also stimulate plant growth in a density-dependent manner [31] and eventually lead to overcompensation [32,33]. However, abiotic conditions such as soil fertility can alter grazing effect on plants [34,35] by allowing greater compensation for grazing
damage in resource-rich conditions [36,37]. This emphasizes that the net effect of grazing on plant biomass and trait manifestation is likely dependent on resource availability (i.e., light and nutrients). Furthermore, the interaction of herbivory and resources on plant responses may be altered by changing climate. Climate change can alter plant-herbivore interactions through direct effects on herbivores but also directly affecting plants [38]. Likewise, climate change may modify plant-resource interactions, for example, due to accelerated nutrient cycling in response to warmer tempera- tures [39]. For temperate grasslands in Central Germany, climate change forecasts predict warmer temperatures throughout the growing season, increased spring and autumn precipita- tion, and reduced precipitation and increasing risk of drought spells during summer [40–42]. Warmer temperatures and water surplus at the beginning of the growing season can stimulate plant growth, increasing height and biomass [43,44], and in general promoting traits of fast resource-use [45]. Herbivores, by targeting taller plants [28,46], can dampen the effect of warming on plant traits and thus alter plant performance in response to warmer temperatures [8,11]. On the other hand, reduced precipitation during summer can cause physiological stress PLOS ONE Transplant performance and trait responses to abiotic and biotic changes PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276789 November 8, 2022 2 / 16 Funding: This work was supported by the Flexpool program of the German Centre for Integrative
Biodiversity Research (iDiv) – Halle, Jena, Leipzig [grant no. 34600565-11] and by a research grant from the Finnish Academy to A.E. [project 29719]. There was no additional external funding received for this study. https://www.idiv.de/en/research/ flexpool.html https://www.aka.fi/en/ The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.