Offsetting unabated agricultural emissions with CO2 removal to achieve ambitious climate targets

43. Honegger M, Reiner D. The political economy of negative emissions technologies: consequences for international policy design. Clim Policy. 2018; 18: 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017. 1413322 44. Lomax G, Workman M, Lenton T, Shah N. Reframing the policy approach to greenhouse gas removal technologies. Energy Policy. 2015; 78: 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.10.002 45. Meadowcroft J. Exploring negative territory Carbon dioxide removal and climate policy initiatives. Clim Change. 2013; 118: 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0684-1 46. Pearse R, Bo¨hm S. Ten reasons why carbon markets will not bring about radical emissions reduction. Carbon Manag. 2014; 5: 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2014.990679 47. Common metrics | UNFCCC. [cited 25 Nov 2020]. Available: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/ transparency-and-reporting/methods-for-climate-change-transparency/common-metrics 48. Smith SJ, Wigley ML. Global Warming Potentials: 1. Climatic Implications of Emissions Reductions. Clim Change. 2000; 44: 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005584914078 49. Fuglestvedt JS, Berntsen TK, Godal O, Sausen R, Shine KP, Skodvin T. Metrics of Climate Change: Assessing Radiative Forcing and Emission Indices. Clim Change. 2003; 58: 267–331. https://doi.org/ 10.1023/A:1023905326842 50. Shine KP. The global warming potential—the need for an interdisciplinary retrial. Clim Change. 2009; 96: 467–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9647-6

51. Pierrehumbert R t. Short-Lived Climate Pollution. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 2014; 42: 341–379. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-060313-054843 52. Denison S, Forster PM, Smith CJ. Guidance on emissions metrics for nationally determined contribu- tions under the Paris Agreement. Environ Res Lett. 2019; 14: 124002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748- 9326/ab4df4 53. The Kyoto Protocol: CO2 CH4 and climate implications—Wigley—1998—Geophysical Research Let- ters—Wiley Online Library. [cited 5 Dec 2020]. Available: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ abs/10.1029/98GL01855 54. Shine KP, Fuglestvedt JS, Hailemariam K, Stuber N. Alternatives to the Global Warming Potential for Comparing Climate Impacts of Emissions of Greenhouse Gases. Clim Change. 2005; 68: 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-1146-9 55. Allen MR, Shine KP, Fuglestvedt JS, Millar RJ, Cain M, Frame DJ, et al. A solution to the misrepresenta- tions of CO 2 -equivalent emissions of short-lived climate pollutants under ambitious mitigation. Npj Clim Atmospheric Sci. 2018; 1: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0026-8 56. Huntingford C, Lowe JA, Howarth N, Bowerman NHA, Gohar LK, Otto A, et al. The implications of car- bon dioxide and methane exchange for the heavy mitigation RCP2.6 scenario under two metrics. Envi- ron Sci Policy. 2015; 51: 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.013 57. Lauder AR, Enting IG, Carter JO, Clisby N, Cowie AL, Henry BK, et al. Offsetting methane emissions—

An alternative to emission equivalence metrics. Int J Greenh Gas Control. 2013; 12: 419–429. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.11.028 58. Edjabou LD, Smed S. The effect of using consumption taxes on foods to promote climate friendly diets– The case of Denmark. Food Policy. 2013; 39: 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.12.004 59. van Vuuren DP, Stehfest E, den Elzen MGJ, Kram T, van Vliet J, Deetman S, et al. RCP2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2˚C. Clim Change. 2011; 109: 95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0152-3 60. Riahi K, van Vuuren DP, Kriegler E, Edmonds J, O’Neill BC, Fujimori S, et al. The Shared Socioeco- nomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. Glob Environ Change. 2017; 42: 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 61. van Vuuren DP, Stehfest E, Gernaat DEHJ, Doelman JC, van den Berg M, Harmsen M, et al. Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm. Glob Environ Change. 2017; 42: 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.008 62. Gidden MJ, Riahi K, Smith SJ, Fujimori S, Luderer G, Kriegler E, et al. Global emissions pathways under different socioeconomic scenarios for use in CMIP6: a dataset of harmonized emissions trajecto- ries through the end of the century. Geosci Model Dev. 2019; 12: 1443–1475. https://doi.org/10.5194/ gmd-12-1443-2019 63. Rogelj J, Popp A, Calvin KV, Luderer G, Emmerling J, Gernaat D, et al. Scenarios towards limiting

global mean temperature increase below 1.5˚C. Nat Clim Change. 2018; 8: 325–332. https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41558-018-0091-3 64. Millar RJ, Nicholls ZR, Friedlingstein P, Allen MR. A modified impulse-response representation of the global near-surface air temperature and atmospheric concentration response to carbon dioxide emis- sions. Atmospheric Chem Phys. 2017; 17: 7213–7228. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7213-2017 PLOS ONE Offsetting future agricultural emissions with CO2 removal PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247887 March 17, 2021 17 / 19