Thông tin tài nguyên

Offsetting unabated agricultural emissions with CO2 removal to achieve ambitious climate targets

pmc-PMC7968634.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 19 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 15 · Đoạn 41Vị trí nguồn

to eradicate poverty. 2018. Available: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/06/SR15_ Full_Report_High_Res.pdf 2. Shoemaker JK, Schrag DP, Molina MJ, Ramanathan V. What Role for Short-Lived Climate Pollutants in Mitigation Policy? Science. 2013; 342: 1323–1324. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240162 PMID: 24337280 3. IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: Inter- governmental Panel for Climate Change; 2014 p. 151. Available: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/ 4. Mbow, C., C., Rosenzweig, L.G., Barioni LG. Chapter 5: Food Security—Special Report on Climate Change and Land. 2019. Available: https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/chapter-5/ 5. Rosenzweig C, Mbow C, Barioni LG, Benton TG, Herrero M, Krishnapillai M, et al. Climate change responses benefit from a global food system approach. Nat Food. 2020; 1: 94–97. https://doi.org/10. 1038/s43016-020-0031-z 6. Gernaat DEHJ, Calvin K, Lucas PL, Luderer G, Otto SAC, Rao S, et al. Understanding the contribution of non-carbon dioxide gases in deep mitigation scenarios. Glob Environ Change. 2015; 33: 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.010 7. Popp A, Calvin K, Fujimori S, Havlik P, Humpeno¨ der F, Stehfest E, et al. Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. Glob Environ Change. 2017; 42: 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2016.10.002

Trang 15 · Đoạn 42Vị trí nguồn

8. Rogelj J, Forster PM, Kriegler E, Smith CJ, Se´ fe´ rian R. Estimating and tracking the remaining carbon budget for stringent climate targets. Nature. 2019; 571: 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019- 1368-z PMID: 31316194 9. Karakurt I, Aydin G, Aydiner K. Sources and mitigation of methane emissions by sectors: A critical review. Renew Energy. 2012; 39: 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.09.006 10. Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, et al. Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2013. 11. Wollenberg E, Richards M, Smith P, Havlı´k P, Obersteiner M, Tubiello FN, et al. Reducing emissions from agriculture to meet the 2˚C target. Glob Change Biol. 2016; 22: 3859–3864. https://doi.org/10. 1111/gcb.13340 PMID: 27185416 12. Tubiello FN, Salvatore M, Condor Golec RD, Ferrara A, Rossi S, Biancalani R, et al. Agriculture, forestry and other land use emissions by sources and removals by sinks. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2014. 13. Montzka SA, Dlugokencky EJ, Butler JH. Non-CO2 greenhouse gases and climate change. Nature. 2011; 476: 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10322 PMID: 21814274 14. Bajzˇelj B, Richards KS, Allwood JM, Smith P, Dennis JS, Curmi E, et al. Importance of food-demand management for climate mitigation. Nat Clim Change. 2014; 4: 924–929. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nclimate2353

Trang 15 · Đoạn 43Vị trí nguồn

15. Leahy S, Clark H, Reisinger A. Challenges and Prospects for Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Pathways Consistent With the Paris Agreement. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2020; 4. https://doi.org/10. 3389/fsufs.2020.00097 PMID: 33073178 16. Bennetzen EH, Smith P, Porter JR. Decoupling of greenhouse gas emissions from global agricultural production: 1970–2050. Glob Change Biol. 2016; 22: 763–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13120 PMID: 26451699 17. Frank S, Havlı´k P, Stehfest E, Meijl H van, Witzke P, Pe´ rez-Domı´nguez I, et al. Agricultural non-CO 2 emission reduction potential in the context of the 1.5˚C target. Nat Clim Change. 2019; 9: 66–72. https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0358-8 18. FAO. The future of food and agriculture—Alternative pathways to 2050. Rome, Italy: Food and Agricul- ture Organization of the United Nations; 2018. Available: http://www.fao.org/3/CA1553EN/ca1553en. pdf 19. Huppmann D, Rogelj J, Kriegler E, Krey V, Riahi K. A new scenario resource for integrated 1.5˚C research. Nat Clim Change. 2018; 8: 1027–1030. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0317-4 20. Springmann M, Godfray HCJ, Rayner M, Scarborough P. Analysis and valuation of the health and cli- mate change cobenefits of dietary change. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016; 113: 4146–4151. https://doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.1523119113 PMID: 27001851 21. Stehfest E, Bouwman L, van Vuuren DP, den Elzen MGJ, Eickhout B, Kabat P. Climate benefits of changing diet. Clim Change. 2009; 95: 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9534-6 PLOS ONE Offsetting future agricultural emissions with CO2 removal

Trang 15 · Đoạn 44Vị trí nguồn

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247887 March 17, 2021 15 / 19